A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 186-190

  Takeda, Yuji ^a   Phillips, Steven ^a   Kumada, Takatsune ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; VISION;

ATTENTION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33947511839     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601063142     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bundesen, C. (1998). A computational theory of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 353, 1271-1281.
2. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
3. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
4. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489.
5. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
6. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596-9601.
7. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
8. McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D., & Group, P. R. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vols. I & II). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154-155.
10. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
11. Nothdurft, H. C. (2000). Salience from feature contrast: Additivity across dimensions. Vision Research, 40, 1183-1201.
12. Rousselet, G., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629-630.
13. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
14. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
15. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
16. Zeki, S. (2001). Localization and globalization in conscious vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 57-86.