On the relationship between common amplitude surface roughness parameters and surface area: Implications for the study of cell-material interactions

International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation

Volumn 59, Issue 3 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 245-251

  Donoso, M G ^a   Mendez Vilas A ^a   Bruque, J M ^a   Gonzalez Martin M L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adhesion; AFM; Atomic force microscopy; Average roughness; Cell material interaction; Contact area; Interfaces; Rms roughness; Surface area; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

AVERAGE ROUGHNESS; CELL-MATERIAL INTERACTION; CONTACT AREA; RMS ROUGHNESS; SURFACE AREA;

CELL CULTURE;

ADHESION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; INTERFACE; SURFACE AREA; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 33947511603     PISSN: 09648305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abdelsalam M.E., Bartlett P.N., Kelf T., and Baumberg J. Wetting of regularly structured gold surfaces. Langmuir 21 (2005) 1753-1757
2. Bathomarco R.V., Solorzano G., Elias C.N., and Priori R. Atomic force microscopy analysis of different surface treatments of Ti dental implant surfaces. Applied Surface Science 233 (2004) 29-34
3. Berim G.O., and Ruckenstein E. Microscopic interpretation of the dependence of the contact angle on roughness. Langmuir 21 (2005) 7743-7751
4. Burton Z., and Bhushan B. Hydrophobicity, adhesion, and friction properties of nanopatterned polymers and scale dependence for micro- and nanoelectromechanical systems. Nano Letters 5 (2005) 1607-1613
5. Curtis A.S.G., Casey B., Gallagher J.O., Pasqui D., Wood M.A., and Wilkinson C.D.W. Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important?. Biophysical Chemistry 94 (2001) 275-283
6. Cyster J.C., Shotton D.M., and Williams A.F. The dimensions of the T lymphocyte glycoprotein leukosialin and identification of linear protein epitopes that can be modified by glycosylation. EMBO Journal 10 (1991) 893-902
7. Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Sutherland D.S., Agheli H., and Curtis A.S.G. Use of nanotopography to study mechanotransduction in fibroblasts-methods and perspectives. European Journal of Cell Biology 83 (2004) 159-169
8. Deligianni D.D., Katsala N.D., Koutsoukos P.G., and Missirlis Y.F. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and detachment strength. Biomaterials 22 (2001) 87-96
9. Katsikogianni M., and Missirlis Y.F. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. European Cells and Materials 8 (2004) 37-57
10. Keller J.C., Collins J.G., Niederauer G.G., and McGee T.D. In vitro attachment of osteoblast-like cells to osteoceramic materials. Dental Materials 13 (1997) 62-68
11. Krupenkin T.N., Taylor J.A., Schneider T.M., and Yang S. From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 20 (2004) 3824-3827
12. Méndez-Vilas A., Nuevo M.J., González Martín M.L., and Labajos-Broncano L. Quantitative surface roughness determination of materials by AFM: some limitations. Materials Science Forum 408-412 (2002) 239-244
13. Rice J.M., Hunt J.A., Gallagher J.A., Hanarp P., Sutherland D.S., and Gold J. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 4799-4818
14. Terada A., Yuasa A., Tsuneda S., Hirata A., Katakai A., and Tamada M. Elucidation of dominant effect on initial bacterial adhesion onto polymer surfaces prepared by radiation-induced graft polymerization. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 43 (2005) 99-107
15. Vitte J., Benoliel A.M., Pierres A., and Bongrand P. European Cells and Materials 7 (2004) 52-63