Phylogenetic relationships of Chilean leptodactylids: A molecular approach based on mitochondrial genes 12S and 16S

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 435-440

  Correa, Claudio ^a   Veloso, Alberto ^a   Iturra, Patricia ^b   Méndez, Marco A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Calyptocephalellini; Phylogenetic reconstruction; Rhinodermatidae; Ribosomal mitochondrial genes; Telmatobiinae

Indexed keywords

ALSODES; AMPHIBIA; ANURA; ATELOGNATHUS; BATRACHYLA; CAUDIVERBERA; EUPSOPHUS; HYLOIDEA; HYLORINA; INSUETOPHRYNUS; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; NEOBATRACHIA; PLEURODEMA; RHINODERMA; RHINODERMATIDAE; TELMATOBIINAE; TELMATOBIUS; TELMATOBUFO;

EID: 33947510163     PISSN: 0716078X     EISSN: 07176317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0716-078X2006000400003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Austin JD, SC Lougheed, K Tanner, AA Chek, JP Bogart & PT Boag (2002) A molecular perspective on the evolutionary affinities of an enigmatic neotropical frog, Allophryne ruthveni. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 335-346.
2. Báez AM & ZM de Gasparini (1979) The South American herpetofauna: an evaluation of the fossil record. In: Duellman WD (ed) The South American herpetofauna: its origin, evolution and dispersal: 141-156. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
3. Barrio A & P Rinaldi de Chieri (1971) Contribución al esclarecimiento de la posición taxofilética de algunos batracios patagónicos de la familia Leptodactylidae mediante el análisis cariotípico. Physis (Argentina) 81: 673-685.
4. Basso NG (1994) Una nueva especie de Batrachyla (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Telmatobiinae) de Argentina. Relaciones filogenéticas interespecíficas. Cuadernos de Herpetología (Argentina) 8: 51-56.
5. Biju SD & F Bossuyt (2003) New frog family from India reveals an ancient biogeographical link with the Seychelles. Nature 425: 711-714.
6. Cardillo M, ORP Bininda-Emonds, E Boakes & A Purvis (2004) A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials. Journal of Zoology, London 264: 11-31.
7. Cei JM (1962) Batracios de Chile. Ediciones Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 128 + cviii pp.
8. Cei JM (1970) La posición filética de Telmatobiinae, su discusión reciente y significado crítico de algunos inmunotests. Acta Zoológica Lilloana (Perú) 27: 181-192.
9. Crawford AJ & EN Smith (2005) Cenozoic biogeography and evolution in direct-developing frogs of Central America (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus) as inferred from a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 536-555.
10. Crisci JV, MM Cigliano, JJ Morrone & S Roig-Junent (1991) A comparative review of cladistic approaches to historical biogeography of southern South America. Systematic Zoology 42: 152-171.
11. Darst CR & DC Cannatella (2004) Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 462-475.
12. Díaz NF (1981) Aspectos comparativos de lactato deshidrogenasas de cristalinos aplicados a la sistemática de los anfibios chilenos. Medio Ambiente (Chile) 5: 39-44.
13. Díaz NF (1986) Biosistemática de los Leptodactylidae chilenos. Anales del Museo de Historia Natural de Valparaíso (Chile) 17: 65-85.
14. DÍAZ NF (1989) Phenetic and phylogenetic relationships of the Chilean Alsodes and Telmatobius (Amphibian, Leptodactylidae) and proposal of a new genus. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 24: 25-33.
15. Díaz NF & A Veloso (1979) Sistemática y evolución de los anfibios de Chile. Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales (Chile) 12: 59-70.
16. Díaz-Páez H & JC Ortiz (2003) Evaluación del estado de conservación de los anfibios chilenos. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76: 509-525.
17. Duellman WE & L Trueb (1994) Biology of Amphibians. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 670 pp.
18. Duellman WE & A Veloso (1977) Phylogeny of Pleurodema (Anura: Leptodactylidae): a biogeographic model. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 64: 1-46.
19. Faivovich J, CFB Haddad, PCA GarcÍa, DR Frost, JA Campbell & WC Wheeler (2005) Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294: 1-240.
20. Farris JS, M Källersjö, AG Kluge & C Bult (1995) Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
21. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
22. Ford LS & DC Cannatella (1993) The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 7: 94-117.
23. Formas JR (1979) La Herpetofauna de los bosques temperados de Sudamérica. In: Duellman WD (ed) The South American herpetofauna: its origin, evolution and dispersal: 341-369. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
24. Formas JR (1980) The chromosomes of E. calcaratus and the karyological evolution of the genus Eupsophus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) Experientia 36: 1163-1164.
25. Formas JR (1995) Anfibios. In: Simonetti JA, MTK Arroyo, AE Spotorno & E Lozada (eds) Diversidad biológica de Chile: 314-325. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Santiago, Chile.
26. Formas JR & ND Espinoza (1975) Karyological relationships of Telmatobufo (Anura; Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica 31: 429-432.
27. Frost DR (2004) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 3.0 (22 August, 2004). Electronic database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
28. Grandison AGC (1961) Chilean species of the genus Eupsophus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 8: 111-149.
29. HAAS A (2003) Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 19: 23-89.
30. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT, Versión 5.0.9, 2001. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
31. Heyer WR (1975) A preliminary analysis of the intergeneric relationships of the frog family Leptodactylidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 199: 1-55.
32. Hoegg S, M Vences, H Brinkmann & A Meyer (2004) Phylogeny and comparative substitution rates of frogs inferred from sequences of three nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1188-1200.
33. Huelsenbeck JP & F Ronquist (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
34. Knapp M, K Stöckler, D Havell, F Delsuc, F Sebastiani, & PJ Lockhart (2005) Relaxed molecular clock provides evidence for long-distance dispersal of Nothofagus (southern beech). PLoS Biology 3: e14.
35. Kocher TD, WK Thomas, A Meyer, SV Edwards, S Pääbo, FX Villablanca & AC Wilson (1989) Dynamics of mitochodrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 86: 6196-6200.
36. Lehr E, G Fritzsch & A Müller (2005) Analysis of Andes Frogs (Phrynopus, Leptodactylidae, Anura) phylogeny based on 12S and 16S mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Zoologica Scripta 34: 593-603.
37. Lynch JD (1971) Evolutionary relationships, osteology and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publication 53: 1-238.
38. Lynch JD (1973) The transition from archaic to advanced frogs. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems: 133-182. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
39. Lynch JD (1978) A re-assessment of the Telmatobiine leptodactylid frogs of Patagonia. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 72: 1-57.
40. Medrano JF, E Aasen & Sharrow (1990) DNA extraction from nucleated red blood cells. Biotechniques 8: 43.
41. Meriggio V, A Veloso, S Young & H Núñez (2004) Atelognathus jeinimenensis n. sp. de Leptodactylidae para el sur de Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural (Chile) 53: 99-123.
42. Palma RE & AE Spotorno (1999) Molecular systematics of marsupials based on the rRNA 12S mitochondrial gene: the phylogeny of Didelphimorphia and of the living fossil microbiotheriid Dromiciops gliroides Thomas. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 525-535.
43. Palumbi SR, A Martin, S Romano, WO McMillan, L Stice & G Grabowski (1991) The simple fool's guide to PCR, Version 2.0. Privately published document compiled by Palumbi S. Special Publication of Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA. 44 pp.
44. Posada D & KA Crandall (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
45. Reig OA (1960) Las relaciones genéricas del anuro chileno Calyptocephalella gayi (Dum. & Bibr.). Actas y Trabajos del Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Zoología (La Plata, 1959) 4: 113-131.
46. Roe BA, D-P Ma, RK Wilson & F-H Wong (1985) The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. Journal of Biological Chemistry 260: 9759-9774.
47. Roelants K & F Bossuyt (2005) Archaeobatrachian paraphyly and pangaean diversification of crown-group frogs. Systematic Biology 54: 111-126.
48. Ruvinsky I & L MaxSon (1996) Phylogenetic relationships among bufonoids frogs (Anura: Neobatrachia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 533-547.
49. San Mauro D, M Vences, M Alcobendas, R Zardoya & A Meyer (2005) Initial diversification of living amphibians predated the breakup of Pangaea. American Naturalist 165: 590-599.
50. Sanmartín I & F Ronquist (2004) Southern Hemisphere biogeography inferred by eventbased models: plant versus animal patterns. Systematic Biology 53: 216-243.
51. Savage JM (1973) The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems: 351-445. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
52. Schaeffer B (1949) Anurans from the early Tertiary of Patagonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 93: 47-68.
53. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
54. Thompson JD, TJ Gibson, F Plewniak, F Jeanmougin & DG Higgins (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
55. Vellard J (1957) Répartition des batracien dans les Andes au sud de l'Equateur. Travaux Institut Français d'Études Andines (Perú) 5: 141-161.
56. Veloso A, JL Celis-Diez, PC Guerrero, M Méndez, P Iturra & JA Simonetti (2005) Description of a new Eupsophus species (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) from the remnants of Maulino forest, central Chile. Herpetological Journal 15: 159-165.
57. Veloso A & J Navarro (1988) Lista sistemática y distribución geográfica de anfibios y reptiles de Chile. Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino (Italy) 6: 481-539.
58. Vences M, J Kosuch, S Lötters, A Widmer, K Jungfer, J Köhler & M Veith (2000) Phylogeny and classification of poison frogs (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae), based on mitochondrial 16S and 12S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 34-40.
59. Vences M, J Kosuch, R Boistel, CFB Haddad, E La Marca, S Lötters & M Veith (2003) Convergent evolution of aposematic coloration in Neotropical poison frogs: a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 3: 215-226.
60. Vuilleumier F (1968) Origin of frogs of Patagonian forests. Nature 219: 87-89.
61. Wiens JJ, JW Fetzner, CL Parkinson & TW Reeder (2005) Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Systematic Biology 54: 719-748.