Behavioral sensitization produced by a single administration of apomorphine: Implications for the role of Pavlovian conditioning in the mediation of context-specific sensitization

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 449-457

  Bloise, Enrrico ^a   Carey, Robert J ^b   Carrera, Marinete Pinheiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE FLUMINENSE DARCY RIBEIRO   (Brazil)

^b SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomorphine; Behavioral sensitization; Context specific sensitization; High dose; Locomotion; Moderate dose; Rearing; Sniffing

Indexed keywords

APOMORPHINE; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG MEGADOSE; DRUG SENSITIZATION; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REARING; RECEPTOR UPREGULATION; SNIFFING;

ANIMALS; APOMORPHINE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DOPAMINE AGONISTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

RATTUS;

EID: 33947501694     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anagnostaras S.G., and Robinson T.E. Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 110 (1996) 1397-1414
2. Badiani A., Camp D.M., and Robinson T.E. Enduring enhancement of amphetamine sensitization by drug-associated environmental stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282 (1997) 787-794
3. Battisti J.J., Uretsky N.J., and Wallace L.J. Sensitization of apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice is context dependent. Psychopharmacology 146 (1999) 42-48
4. Battisti J.J., Uretsky N.J., and Wallace L.J. Importance of environmental context in the development of amphetamine- or apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior after single and multiple doses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66 (2000) 671-677
5. Beinfeld M.C., Connolly K.J., and Pierce R.C. Cocaine treatment increases extracellular cholecystokinin (CCK) in the nucleus accumbens shell of awake, freely moving rats, an effect that is enhanced in rats that are behaviorally sensitized to cocaine. J Neurochem 81 (2002) 1021-1027
6. Carey R.J., and Gui J. Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship?. Behav Brain Res 92 (1998) 67-76
7. Carey R., Damianopoulos E., and DePalma G. Issues in the pharmacological modification of cocaine conditioning: evidence that the stimulus properties of drugs can interact with contextual cues to activate or inactivate cocaine conditioned stimuli. Behav Brain Res 101 (1999) 189-206
8. Carey R.J., DePalma G., Damianopoulos E., Shanahan A., Muller C.P., and Huston J.P. Pharmacological inhibition of DA- and 5-HT activity blocks spontaneous and cocaine-activated behavior: reversal by chronic cocaine treatment. Brain Res 1047 (2005) 194-204
9. Carey R.J., DePalma G., Damianopoulos E., and Shanahan A. Stimulus gated cocaine sensitization: interoceptive drug cue control of cocaine locomotor sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 82 (2005) 353-360
10. Carlezon Jr. W.A., Mendrek A., and Wise R.A. MK-801 disrupts the expression but not the development of bromocriptine sensitization: a state-dependency interpretation. Synapse 20 (1995) 1-9
11. Cerbone A., and Sadile A.G. Behavioral habituation to spatial novelty: interference and noninterference studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 18 (1994) 497-518
12. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., and Robinson T.E. Signalled versus unsignalled intravenous amphetamine: large differences in the acute psychomotor response and sensitization. Brain Res 722 (1996) 227-231
13. Damianopoulos E.N. Conditioning, attention, and the CS-US interval. A theoretical statement of relations. Pavlov J Biol Sci 22 (1987) 16-30
14. Damianopoulos E.N., and Carey R.J. Apomorphine sensitization effects: evidence for environmentally contingent behavioral reorganization processes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45 (1993) 655-663
15. Dias F.R., Carey R.J., and Carrera M.P. Conditioned locomotion induced by unilateral intrastriatal administration of apomorphine: D(2) receptor activation is critical but not the expression of the unconditioned response. Brain Res 1083 (2006) 85-95
16. Frey P.W., and Sears R.J. Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorla-Wagner associative axiom, a dynamic attention process, and a catastrophe rule. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 321-340
17. Jarbe T.U., Sterner U., and Hjerpe C. Conditioning of an interoceptive drug stimulus to different exteroceptive contexts. Psychopharmacology 73 (1981) 23-26
18. Jodogne C., Marinelli M., Le Moal M., and Piazza P.V. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657 (1994) 236-244
19. Mackintosh N.J. Blocking of conditioned suppression: role of the first compound trial. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1 (1975) 335-345
20. Mattingly B.A., and Gotsick J.E. Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103 (1989) 1311-1317
21. Mattingly B.A., Gotsick J.E., and Salamanca K. Latent sensitization to apomorphine following repeated low doses. Behav Neurosci 102 (1988) 553-558
22. Mattingly B.A., Gotsick J.E., and Marin C. Locomotor activity and stereotypy in rats following repeated apomorphine treatments at 1-, 3-, or 7-day intervals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31 (1988) 871-875
23. Mattingly B.A., Rice L.L., Langfels M., and Fields S.E. Repeated treatments with 7-OH-DPAT: context-independent behavioral sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65 (2000) 241-246
24. Overton D.A. Discriminable effects of antimuscarinics: dose response and substitution test studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6 (1977) 659-666
25. Post R.M., and Rose H. Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat. Nature 260 (1976) 731-732
26. Post R.M., Weiss S.R., and Pert A. The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacol Bull 23 (1987) 425-429
27. Revusky S., and Reilly S. When pentobarbital is the conditioned stimulus and amphetamine is the unconditioned stimulus, conditioning depends on the type of conditioned response. Behav Neurosci 104 (1990) 693-703
28. Robinson T.E., and Becker J.B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res 396 (1986) 157-198
29. Segal D.S., Geyer M.A., and Schuckit M.A. Stimulant-induced psychosis: an evaluation of animal models. Essays Neurochem Neuropharmacol 5 (1981) 95-129
30. Siegel S. State dependent learning and morphine tolerance. Behav Neurosci 02 (1988) 228-232
31. Stewart J., and Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 4 (1993) 289-312
32. Taukulis H.K. Pavlovian conditioning to a diazepam cue with yohimbine as the unconditional stimulus. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65 (1996) 223-232
33. Todtenkopf M.S., and Carlezon Jr. W.A. Contribution of drug doses and conditioning periods to psychomotor stimulant sensitization. Psychopharmacology 185 (2006) 451-458
34. Todtenkopf M.S., Mihalakopoulos A., and Stellar J.R. Withdrawal duration differentially affects c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and discrete subregions of the nucleus accumbens in cocaine-sensitized rats. Neuroscience 114 (2002) 1061-1069
35. Ungless M.A., Whistler J.L., Malenka R.C., and Bonci A. Single cocaine exposure in vivo induces long-term potentiation in dopamine neurons. Nature 411 (2001) 583-587