Comparisons of linear and nonlinear image restoration

Microscopy and Microanalysis

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 469-475

  Chang, Lan Yun ^a   Kirkland, Angus I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exit wave reconstruction; High resolution transmission electron microscopy; Maximum likelihood method; Monte Carlo integration; Nonlinear imaging; Wiener filter

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947499027     PISSN: 14319276     EISSN: 14358115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927606060582     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. CHANG, L.Y., MEYER, R.R. & KIRKLAND, A.I. (2005). Calculations of HREM image intensity using Monte Carlo integration. Ultramicroscopy 101, 171-181.
2. COENE, W. & VAN DYCK, D. (1988). New aspect in nonlinear image processing for high resolution electron microscopy. Scan Microsc 2, 213-224.
3. COENE, W.M.J., THUST, A., OP DE BEECK, M. & VAN DYCK, D. (1996). Maximum likelihood method for focus-variation image reconstruction in high resolution transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 64, 109-135.
4. COWLEY, J.M. & MOODIE, A.F. (1957). The scattering of electrons by atoms and crystals. I. A new theoretical approach. Acta Crystallogr 10, 609.
5. HANSSEN, K.J. & TREPTE, L. (1971). The influence of voltage and current fluctuations and of a finite energy width of the electrons on contrast and resolution in electron microscopy. Optik 32, 519-538.
6. HAWKES, P.W. (1980). Image processing based on the linear theory of image formation. In Computer Processing of Electron Microscope Images, Hawkes, P.W. (Ed.), pp. 2-28. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. HOPKINS, H.H. (1953). On the diffraction theory of optical images. Proc Roy Soc A 217, 408-432.
8. HUMPHREYS, C.J. & SPENCE, J.C.H. (1981). Resolution and illumination coherence in electron microscopy. Optik 58, 125-144.
9. KIRKLAND, E.J. (1982). Nonlinear high resolution image processing of conventional transmission electron micrographs I. Theory. Ultramicroscopy 9, 45-64.
10. KIRKLAND, E.J. (1984). Improved high resolution image processing of bright field electron micrographs I. Theory. Ultramicroscopy 17, 151-172.
11. OP DE BEECK, M., VAN DYCK, D. & COENE, W. (1996). Wave function reconstruction in HRTEM: The parabola method. Ultramicroscopy 64, 167-183.
12. PRESS, W.H., TEUKOLSKY, S.A., VETTERLING, W.T. & FLANNERY, B.P. (2002). Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. SAXTON, W.O. (1978). Computer Techniques for Imaging Processing in Electron Microscopy. New York and London: Academic Press.
14. SAXTON, W.O. (1980). Computer processing of electron microscope images. In Topics of Current Physics, Hawkes, P.W. (Ed.), pp. 35-87. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. SAXTON, W.O. (1988). Accurate atom positions from focal and tilted beam series of high-resolution electron-micrographs. Scan Microsc 2, 213-224.
16. SCHISKE, P. (1968). Zur Frage der Bildrekonstruktion durch Fokusreihen. In Proceedings of the 4th Regional Congress on Electron Microscopy, vol. 1, p. 145. Rome, Italy: Tipografia Poliglotta Vaticana.
17. SCHISKE, P. (1973). Image processing using additional statistical information about the object. In 5th European Conference on Electron Microscopy, Image Processing and Computer-Aided Design in Electron Optics, Hawkes, P.W. (Ed.), p. 82. Manchester: Academic Press.
18. SPENCE, J.C.H. (1988). Experimental High-Resolution Electron Microscopy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. SPENCE, J.C.H. (1999). The future of atomic resolution electron microscopy for materials science. Mater Sci Eng R26, 1-49.