Relationships between procedural rigidity and interrepresentational change in children's drawing behavior

Child Development

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 522-541

  Picard, Delphine ^a   Vinter, Annie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL VALÉRY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; APTITUDE; ART; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CREATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

AGE FACTORS; APTITUDE; ART; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CREATIVENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE;

EID: 33947498911     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01013.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barlow, C. M., Jolley, R. P., White, D. G., & Galbraith, D. (2003). Rigidity in children's drawings and its relation with representational change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 124-152.
2. Barrett, M., & Eames, K. (1996). Sequential developments in children's human figure drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 219-236.
3. Berti, A. E., & Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in resources for pictorial innovations: A three-component analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 501-522.
4. Braswell, G. S., & Rosengren, K. K. (2000). Decreasing variability in the development of graphic production. International Journal of Behavioral and Development, 24, 153-166.
5. Bremner, J. G., Morse, R., Hughes, S., & Andreasen, G. (2000). Relations between drawing cubes and copying line diagrams of cubes in 7- to 10-year-old children. Child Development, 3, 621-634.
6. Chen, M. J. (1985). Young children's representational drawings of solid objects: A comparison of drawing and copying. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 157-175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cox, M. V. (1992). Children's drawings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
8. Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children: Analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes. London: Academic Press.
9. Goodnow, J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). The "grammar of action": Sequence and syntax in children's copying behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82-98.
10. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: Evidence from children's drawing. Cognition, 34, 57-83.
11. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999). Taking development seriously. Human Development, 42, 325-327.
13. Lange-Küttner, C., Kerzmann, A., & Heckhausen, J. (2002). The emergence of visually realistic contour in the drawing of the human figure. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 439-463.
14. Phillips, S., Halford, G. S., & Wilson, W. H. (1998). What changes in children's drawing procedures? Relational complexity as a constraint on representational redescription. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 5, 33-42.
15. Picard, D., & Durand, K. (2005). Are young children's drawings canonically biased? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 48-64.
16. Picard, D., & Vinter, A. (1999). Representational flexibility in children's drawings: Effects of age and verbal instructions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 605-622.
17. Picard, D., & Vinter, A. (2005). Development of graphic formulas for the depiction of familiar objects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 418-432.
18. Picard, D., & Vinter, A. (2006). Decomposing and connecting object representations in 5- to 9-year-old children's drawing behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 529-545.
19. Reith, E. (1988). The development of the use of contour lines in children's drawings of figurative and non-figurative three-dimensional models. Archives de Psychologie, 56, 83-103.
20. van Sommers, P. (1983). The conservation of children's drawing strategies: At what level does stability persist? In D. Rogers & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), The acquisition of symbolic skills (pp. 65-70). New York: Plenum Press.
21. van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Spensley, F., & Taylor, J. (1999). The development of cognitive flexibility: Evidence from children's drawings. Human Development, 42, 300-324.
23. Spielman, K. S. (1976). Development of the perception of line and production of line forms. Child Development, 47, 787-793.
24. Thelen, E. S., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Vinter, A., & Marot, V. (2007). The development of context sensitivity in children's graphic copying strategies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 94-110.
26. Vinter, A., & Picard, D. (1996). Drawing behaviour in children reflects internal representational changes. In M. L. Simner, C. G. Leedham, & A. J. W. M. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and drawing research (pp. 171-185). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
27. Zhi, Z., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1997). Constraints on representational changes: Drawing a man with two heads. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 275-290.