Development of graphic formulas for the depiction of familiar objects

International Journal of Behavioral Development

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 418-432

  Picard, Delphine ^a   Vinter, Annie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL VALÉRY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRAWING; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; TELEVISION;

EID: 25844530797     PISSN: 01650254     EISSN: 14640651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01650250500206117     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arcuri, L., & Girotto, V. (1986). Norme di tipicita per sei categorie naturali: Uno studio evolutivo. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 409-443.
2. Arnheim, R. (1964). Art and visual perception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Barlow, C. M., Jolley, R. P., White, D. G., & Galbraith, D. (2003). Rigidity in children's drawings and its relation with representational change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 124-152.
4. Berti, A. E., & Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in resources for pictorial innovations: A three-feature analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 501-522.
5. Bjorklund, D. F., Thompson, B. E., & Ornstein, P. A. (1983). Development trends in children's typicality judgments. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 350-356.
6. Cordier, F. (1993). Les représentations cognitives privilégiées: Typicalité et niveau de base. Lille, France: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
7. Cox, M. V. (1992). Children's drawings. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
8. D'Angiulli, A., & Maggi, S. (2003). Development of drawing abilities in a distinct population: Depiction of perceptual principles by three children with congenital total blindness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 193-200.
9. D'Angiulli, A., & Maggi, S, (2004). The depiction of car light beams in a child born completely blind. Perception, 33, 419-428.
10. Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children: Analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes. London: Academic Press.
11. Gabrielson, A., & Seeger, P. (1971). Tests of significance in two-way desings (mixed models) with dichotomous data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24, 111-116.
12. Goodnow, J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). The "grammar of action": Sequence and syntax in children's copying behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82-98.
13. Heller, M. A., Kennedy, J. M., & Joyner, T. D. (1995). Production and interpretation of pictures of houses by blind people. Perception, 24, 1049-1058.
14. Hsu, T., & Feld, L. S. (1969). The effects of limitations on the number of criterion score values on the significance level of the F test. American Education Research Journal, 6, 257-515.
15. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: Evidence from children's drawing. Cognition, 34, 57-83.
16. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999). Taking development seriously. Human Development, 42, 325-327.
18. Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Drawing and the blind: Pictures to touch. Stanford, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Kennedy, J. M. (2003). Drawings from Gaia, a blind girl. Perception, 32, 321-340.
20. Kennedy, J. M., Gabias, P., & Nicholls, A. (1991). Tactile pictures. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 263-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
21. Le Ny, J. F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: PUF.
22. Lunney, G. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Jourval of Educational Measurement, 7, 239-263.
23. Millar, S. (1975). Visual experience or translation rules: Drawing the human figure by blind and sighted children. Perception, 4, 363-371.
24. Nihei, Y. (1983). Developmental change in covert principles for the organization of strokes in drawing and handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 846-849.
25. Ninio, A., & Lieblich, A. (1976). The grammar of action: Phrase structure in children's copying. Child Development, 47, 846-849.
26. Palmer, S. E., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates Inc.
27. Picard, D., & Vinter, A. (1999). Representational flexibility in children's drawings: Effects of age and verbal instructions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 605-622.
28. Simner, M. L. (1981). The grammar of action and children's printing. Developmental Psychology, 17, 866-871.
29. Spensley, F., & Taylor, J. (1999). The development of cognitive flexibility: Evidence from children's drawings. Human Development, 42, 300-324.
30. Stiles, J. (199 5). The early use and development of graphic formulas: Two case study reports of graphic formula production by 2- to 3-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 127-149.
31. Thomassen, A. J. W., & Teulings, H. L. (1979). The development of directional preference in writing movements. Visible Language, 13, 299-313.
32. van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Vinter, A. (1994). Hierarchy among graphic production rules: A developmental approach. In C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lorette, & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: A multidisciplinary approach. Paris: Europia.
34. Vinter, A. (1999). How meaning modifies drawing behaviour in children. Child Development, 70, 33-49.
35. Zhi, Z., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1997). Constraints on representational change: Drawing a man with two heads. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 275-290.