Optimal coppice regimes for eucalyptus in Brazil: A non deterministic analysis;Régimen óptimo para plantaciones de eucaliptos en Brasil: Un análisis no determinista

Interciencia

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2006, Pages

  Rodríguez, Luiz C E ^a   Díaz Balteiro, Luis ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c Technical University of Madrid   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUCALYPTUS;

EID: 33947409610     PISSN: 03781844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ABRAF (2006) Anuário estatístico da ABRAF, ano base 2005. Brasilia, Brasil. 80pp.
2. Ask P, Carlsson M (2000) Nature conservation and timber production in areas with fragmented ownership patterns. Forest Pol. Econ. 1: 209-223.
3. Bateman IJ, Lovett AA (2000) Modelling and valuing carbon sequestration in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils. J. Env. Manag. 60: 301-323.
4. Borges JG, Hoganson HM (1999) Assessing the impact of management unit design and adjacency constraints on forestwide spatial conditions and timber revenues Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1764-1774.
5. Cacho OJ, Hean RL, Wise R (2003) Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives. Aust. J. Agr. Resour. Ec. 47: 153-179.
6. Carlsson M, Andersson M, Dahlin B, Sallnäs O (1998) Spatial patterns of habitat protection in areas with non-industrial private forestry - hypotheses and implications. For. Ecol. Manag. 107: 203-211.
7. CEPEA (2006) Informativo CEPEA - Setor Florestal. www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/ florestal
8. Chang SJ (1998) A generalized Faustmann model for the determination of optimal harvest age. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 652-659.
9. Díaz-Balteiro L, Rodríguez LCE (2006) Optimal rotations on eucalyptus plantations including carbon sequestration - A comparison of results in Brazil and Spain. For. Ecol. Manag. 229: 247-258.
10. Faustmann M (1849) Berechung des Wertes welchen Waldboden sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirtschaft besitzen. Allgem. Forst Jagd Zeit. 15. Reimpreso en Faustmann M (1995) Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. J. Forest Econ. 1: 7-44.
11. Hillier FS, Liebermann GJ (1991) Introducción a la Investigación de Operaciones. McGraw-Hill. México. 1096 pp.
12. Hoen HF, Solberg B (1994) Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Sci. 40: 429-451.
13. Hoganson HM, Borges JG (1998) Using dynamic programming and overlapping subproblems to address adjacency in large harvest scheduling problems. Forest Sci. 44: 526-538.
14. Klemperer D (2001) Incorporating risk into financial analysis of forest management investments. En von Gadow (Ed.) Risk Analysis in Forest Management. Kluwer. Dordrecht, Holanda. pp. 149-170.
15. Knoke T, Moog M, Plusczyk N (2002) On the effect of volatile stumpage prices on the economic attractiveness of a silvicultural transformation strategy. Forest Pol. Econ. 2: 229-240.
16. McKenney DW, Yemshanova D, Fox G, Ramlal E (2004) Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada. Forest Pol. Econ. 6: 345-358.
17. Medema EL, Lyon GW (1985) The determination of financial rotation ages for coppicing tree species. Forest Sci. 31: 398-404.
18. o Simp. Ibero-America no de Gestão e Economia Florestal. Porto Seguro, Brasil. Serie Técnica IPEF 34. pp. 85-106.
19. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good Practice Guidance for Land-use, Land-use Change and Forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Kanagawa, Japón, www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/ gpglulucf.htm
20. Point Carbon (2006) www.pointcarbon.com/
21. Ribeiro CAAS, Graça LR (1996) Manejo por talhadia: estabelecimento das idades ótimas de corte. Rev. Árvore 20: 29-36.
22. Richards KR, Strokes C (2004) A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research, Clim. Change 63: 1-48.
23. Rodríguez LCE (1999) Defining the optimum sequence of rotations for coppice regimes of eucalyptus. En Chang SJ (Ed) Proc. Int. Symp. 150 Years to the Faustmann Formula: its consequences for forestry and economics in the past, present and future. Darmstadt, Alemania. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, pp. 40-47.
24. a ed.). Alianza Economía, Madrid. 214 pp.
25. Romero C, Ríos V, Díaz-Balteiro L (1998) Optimal forest rotation age when carbon captured is considered: theory and applications. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49: 121-131.
26. o Simp. Ibero-Americano Gestão e Economia Florestal. Porto Seguro, Brasil. Serie Técnica IPEF 34. pp. 46-67.
27. th Symp. System Analysis in Forest Resources, Ubatuba, Brasil. Serie Técnica IPEF 35. pp. 23-44.
28. Scanavaca LJr, García JN (2004) Determinação das propiedades físicas e mecânicas da madeira de Eucalyptus urophylla. Sci. Forest. 65: 120-129.
29. Schnute J (1981) A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1128-1140.
30. Smart JCR, Burgess JC (2000) An environmental economic analysis of willow SRC production. J. Forest Econ. 6: 193-225.
31. Sobol IM (1994) A primer for the Monte Carlo Method. CRC. Boca-Raton, FL, EEUU. 107 pp.
32. Tait DE (1986) A dynamic programming solution of financial rotation ages for coppicing tree species. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 799-801.
33. UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/background/items/ 1351.php
34. van Kooten GC, Binkley CS, Delcourt G (1995) Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 77: 365-374.
35. van Kooten GC, Krcmar-Nozic E, Stennes B, van Gorkom R (1999) Economics of fossil fuel substitution and wood product sinks when trees are planted to sequester carbon on agricultural lands in western Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1669-1678.
36. van Kooten GC, Eagle AJ, Manley J, Smolak T (2004) How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks. Env. Sci. Policy 7: 239-251.
37. Whittock SP, Greaves BL, Apiolaza LA (2004) A cash flow model to compare coppice and genetically improved seedling options for Eucalyptus globulus plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 191: 267-274