Safety in numbers data from Oakland, California

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1982, 2006, Pages 150-154

  Geyer, Judy ^a   Raford, Noah ^a   Pham, Trinh ^a   Ragland, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION AVOIDANCE; GROUND VEHICLES; NUMBER THEORY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; PUBLIC POLICY;

DATA SETS; MODEL PARAMETERS; VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

EID: 33947398378     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1982-20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Jacobsen, P. L. Safety in Numbers: More Walkers and Bicyclists, Safer Walking and Bicycling. Injury Prevention, Vol. 9, 2003, pp. 205-209.
2. Leden, L. Pedestrian Risk Decrease with Pedestrian Flow. A Case Study Based on Data from Signalized Intersections in Hamilton, Ontario. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 457-464.
3. Ekman, L. On the Treatment of Flow in Traffic Safety Analysis: A Non-parametric Approach Applied on Vulnerable Road Users. Bulletin 136, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden, 1996.
4. Leden, L., P. Garder, and U. Pulkkinen. An Expert Judgment Model Applied to Estimating the Safety Effect of a Bicycle Facility. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2000, pp. 589-599.
5. Robinson, D. L. Safety in Numbers in Australia: More Walkers and Bicyclists, Safer Walking and Bicycling. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Vol. 16, 2005, pp. 47-51.
6. Raford, N., and D. Ragland. Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 66-74.
7. SAS/STAT User's Guide, 6.09. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 2005.