No time to think: Protecting the reflective space in children’s services

Child Abuse Review

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 101-106

  Jones, Jocelyn ^a   Gallop, Les ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action learning; Action research; Child care supervision; Performance management

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947396939     PISSN: 09529136     EISSN: 10990852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/car.774     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bate P. 2000. Synthesizing research and practice: using the action research approach in health care settings. Social Policy & Administration 34: 478–493.
2. Batty D. 2002. Social services and NHS can learn from charities. http://society.guardian.co.uk/climbie/story (accessed 08/09/2002).
3. Brown A, Bourne I. 1996. The Social Work Supervisor. Open University Press: Buckingham.
4. Department of Health. 1999. Modern Social Services—A Commitment to Improve: The 8th Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Social Services. Department of Health: London.
5. Department of Health. 2000. Assessing Children in Need and their Families: Practice Guidance. The Stationery Office: London.
6. Department of Health, Home Office and Department for Education and Employment. 1999. Working Together to Safeguard Children: A Guide to Inter-Agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children. The Stationery Office: London.
7. Department of Health, Department of Education and Employment and Home Office. 2000. Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families. The Stationery Office: London.
8. Hawkins P, Shohet R. 1989. Supervision in the Helping Professions. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
9. Horwath J. 2002. Maintaining a focus on the child? First impressions of the Framework for Children in Need and their Families in cases of child neglect. Child Abuse Review 11: 195–213.
10. Hughes L, Pengelly P. 1997. Staff Supervision in a Turbulent Environment. Jessica Kingsley: London.
11. Jones J, Treseder J, Glennie S. 2002. An exploration of participation within an Action Research Project designed to improve service delivery to a small group of families with complex needs in an English New Town. Paper presented at the Conference on Action Research, Constructivism, and Democracy, Stockholm, 5–7 June.
12. Kadushin A. 1992. Supervision in Social Work, 3rd edn. University of Columbia Press: New York.
13. Kember D. 2000. Action Learning and Action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning. Kogan Page: London.
14. London Borough of Greenwich. 1987. A Child in Mind. Protection of Children in a Responsible Society: The Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Kimberley Carlile. London Borough of Greenwich: London.
15. McGill I, Beaty L. 2001. Action Learning: A Guide for Professional, Management and Educational Development, 2nd edn. Kogan Page: London.
16. Morrison T. 1993. Staff Supervision in Social Care: An Action Learning Approach. Longmans: Harlow.
17. National Institute for Social Work. 1996. Managing Social Work: Briefing No.14. NISW: London.
18. Randall J, Cowley P, Tomlinson P. 2000. Overcoming barriers to effective child care practice. Child and Family Social Work 5: 343–352.
19. Reason P, Bradbury H (eds). 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage: London.
20. Reder P, Duncan S. 1999. Lost Innocents: A Follow-up Study of Fatal Child Abuse. Routledge: London.
21. Waterson J. 2000. Balancing research and action: reflections on an Action Research Project in a Social Services Department. Social Policy & Administration 34: 494–508.