Heterosis in yield, endotoxin expression and some physiological parameters in Bt transgenic cotton

Plant Breeding

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 169-175

  Dong, H Z ^a   Li, W J ^b   Tang, W ^b   Li, Z H ^b   Zhang, D M ^b  

^a SHANDONG PEANUT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

^b Shandong Key Laboratory for Cotton Culture and Physiology   (China)

Author keywords

Boll sink; Endotoxin expression; Gossypium hirsutum; Heterosis; Leaf source; Photosynthesis; Yield

Indexed keywords

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 33947394797     PISSN: 01799541     EISSN: 14390523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01321.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adamczyk, J. J., and W. R. Meredith, 2004: Genetic basis for variability of CrylAc expression among commercial transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton cultivars in the United States. J. Cotton Sci. 8, 17-23.
2. Adamczyk, J. J., and D. V. Sumerford, 2001: Potential factors impacting season-long expression of Cry1Ac in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard cotton. J. Insect Sci. 1, 13-18.
3. Basu, A. K., and R. S. Paroda, 1995: Hybrid Cotton in India - a Success Story. Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, FAO Regional Office for Asia & The Pacific, Bangkok.
4. Bhardwaj, H. L., and J. B. Weaver, 1984: Combining ability in cotton for agronomic characters, fruiting efficiency, photosynthesis and bollworm resistance. J. Agric. Sci. 103, 511-518.
5. Bhatt, J. G., and M. R. K. Rao, 1981: Heterosis in growth and photosynthetic rate in hybrids of cotton. Euphytica 30, 129-133.
6. Chen, D. H., Y. K. Wu, H. Duan, and Z. G. Wang, 1996: Study on the relationship of sink capacity of unit leaf area to yield and regulation effect to source in cotton population. Acta Gossypii Sin. 8, 109-112.
7. Chen, D. H., Z. L. Wang, Y. K. Wu, B. Xu, and R. S. Cai, 1998: Study on the photosynthetic production and dry matter distribution character of Bt transgenic cotton. Acta Gossypii Sin. 10, 33-37.
8. 1s originated from parents both with Bt genes. Cotton Sci. 15, 284-287.
9. Chen, Z. H., F. B. Wu, X. D. Wang, and G. P. Zhang, 2005: Heterosis in CMS hybrids of cotton for photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Euphytica 144, 353-361.
10. Cui, R. M., F. J. Yan, Z. X. Wang, J. Y. Geng, and X. Y. Zhang, 2002: Study on heterotic distribution of main characters of transgenic Bt cotton. Cotton Sci. 14, 162-165.
11. Davis, D. D., 1978: Hybrid cotton: specific problems and potentials. Adv. Agron. 43, 514-516.
12. Dong, H. Z., W. J. Li, W. Tang, and D. M. Zhang, 2004: Development of hybrid Bt cotton in China - a successful integration of transgenic technology and conventional techniques. Curr. Sci. 86, 778-782.
13. Dong, H. Z., W. J. Li, W. Tang, D. M. Zhang, and Z. H. Li, 2006: Effects of genotypes and plant density on yield, yield components and photosynthesis in Bt transgenic cotton. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192, 132-139.
14. Elmore, C. D., 1980: The paradox of no correlation between leaf photosynthetic rates and crop yield. In: J. D. Hesketh, and J. W. Jones (eds), Predicting Photosynthesis for Ecosystem Models, Vol. II, 155-167. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Galanopoulou-Sendouca, S., and D. Roupakias, 1999: Performance of cotton F1 hybrids and its relation to the mean yield of advanced bulk generations. Eur. J. Agron. 11, 53-62.
16. Greenplate, J., W. Mullins, S. Penn, and K. Embry, 2001: Cry1Ac Bollgard® varieties as influenced by environment, variety and plant age: 1999 gene equivalency field studies. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Vol. 2, 790-793. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN.
17. Guo, W. Z., J. Sun, Y. F. Guo, and T. Z. Zhang, 2001: Investigation of different dosage of inserted Bt genes and their insect-resistance in transgenic Bt cotton. Acta Genet. Sin. 28, 668-676.
18. Gupta, S. P., and T. H. Singh, 1987: Heterosis and inbreeding depression for seed cotton yield and some fiber attributes in upland cotton. Crop Improv. 14, 14-17.
19. Hobbs, S. L. A., T. D. Warkentin, and C. M. O. Delong, 1993: Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 21, 17-26.
20. Khan, U. Q., 2002: Study of heterosis in fiber quality traits of upland cotton. Asian J. Plant Sci. 5, 593-595.
21. Li, D. Y., and X. Y. Jiang, 1992: A study on the nutrient absorption and characteristic of dry matter production in hybrid cotton (G. hirsutium L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 18, 196-204.
22. Li, C. D., H. C. Sun, W. X. Wang, Y. C. Zhang, and Z. X. Xie, 2004: Physiological Changes of Leaves on Early Reproductive Branch Caused by Changing the Ratio of Source to Sink in Cotton. Available at: http://www.cropscience.org. au/icsc2004/poster/2/7/4/1788_licd.htm. Last accessed: 28th October 2006.
23. 2 performance in intraspecific cross of Gossypium hirsutiom L. and G. barbadense L. Crop Sci. 8, 111-113.
24. Meredith, M. R. Jr, and S. Brown, 1998: Heterosis and combining ability of cottons originating from different regions of the United States. J. Cotton Sci. 2, 77-84.
25. Pace, P. F., H. T. Cralle, J. T. Cothren, and S. A. Senseman, 1999: Photosynthesis and dry matter partitioning in short- and long-season cotton cultivars. Crop Sci. 39, 1065-1069.
26. Patil, R. A., and P. R. Chopde, 1985: Heterosis for yield and its traits in upland cotton. Md J. Agric. 55, 402-406.
27. Plaut, Z., M. Luisa, and L. Reinhold, 1987: Effects of altered sink: source ratio on photosynthetic metabolism of source leaves. Plant Physiol. 85, 786-791.
28. Randhawa, L. S., and T. H. Singh, 1994: Heterosis breeding for crossing parent yield barriers in cotton. In: G. A. Constable, and N. W. Forester (eds), Proc. World Cotton Res. Conf. 1, Challenging the Future, 342-345. CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia.
29. Tang, Q. Y., and M. G. Feng, 1997: Practical Statistics and DPS Data Processing System. 1-407. Agricultural Press, Beijing, China.
30. Thomson, N. J., and D. J. Luckett, 1988: Heterosis and combining ability effects on cotton: II. Heterosis. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 39, 991-1002.
31. Turner, J. H., 1953: A study of heterosis in upland cotton: II. Combining ability and inbreeding effects. Agron. J. 45, 487-490.
32. Wang, B. M., Z. P. He, and J. X. Zhao, 1998: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of Bacillus thuringiensis insect control protein expressed in transgenic cotton. Acta Gossypii Sin. 10, 220-221.
33. Wells, R., W. R. Meredith, and J. R. Williford, 1988: Heterosis in upland cotton: II. Relationship of leaf area to plant photosynthesis. Crop Sci. 28, 522-525.
34. Whisler, F. D., B. Acock, D. N. Baker, R. E. Hye, H. F. Hodges, and J. R. Lambert, 1986: Heterosis in upland cotton: I. Growth and leaf area partitioning. Crop Sci. 26, 1119-1123.
35. White, T. G., 1966: Diall analysis of quantitatively inherited characters in Gossypium hirsutiom L. Crop Sci. 6, 253-255.
36. White, T. G., and R. J. Kohel, 1964: A diall analysis of agronomic characters in selected lines of cotton Gossypium hirsutiom L. Crop Sci. 4, 254-257.
37. 2 hybrids in upland cotton. Plant Breed. 123, 285-289.
38. Zelitch, T., 1982: The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield. BioScience 32, 796-802.
39. Zhang, G. Y., L. F. Liu, and Z. Y. Ma, 2001: Study on heterosis utilization of insect-resistant transgenic Bt cotton. Cotton Sci. 13, 264-267.
40. Zhang, Y. S., Y. J. Lv, and H. X. Guo, 2004: Effect of different foreign genes on the heterosis in upland cotton. Acta Agron. Sin. 30, 215-220.