Forecasting bicycle and pedestrian travel: State of the practice and research needs

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1674, 1999, Pages 94-101

  Porter, Christopher ^a   Suhrbier, John ^a   Schwartz, William L ^a  

^a CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BICYCLES; DATA REDUCTION; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES; URBAN PLANNING;

PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 0033207865     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1674-13     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and Bicycle Federation of America. Guidebook on Methods for Forecasting Non-Motorized Travel. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration under subcontract to University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Highway Safety Research Center, forthcoming.
2. Clark, D. E. Estimating Future Bicycle and Pedestrian Trips from a Travel Demand Forecasting Model. 67th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997.
3. Deakin, E. A. Utilitarian Cycling: A Case Study of the Bay Area and Assessment of the Market for Commute Cycling. ITS Research Report. University of California, Berkeley, 1985.
4. Landis, B., and J. Toole. Using the Latent Demand Score Model to Estimate Use. In Pro Bike Pro Walk 96: Forecasting the Future. Bicycle Federation of America/Pedestrian Federation of America, Sept. 1996, pp. 320-325.
5. Ashley, C. A., and C. Banister. Cycling to Work from Wards in a Metropolitan Area. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 30, Nos. 6-8, June to Sept. 1989.
6. Pushkarev, B., and J. M. Zupan. Pedestrian Travel Demand. In Highway Research Record 355, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 37-53.
7. Matlick, J. M. If We Build It, Will They Come? (Forecasting Pedestrian Use and Flows). In Pro Bike Pro Walk 96: Forecasting the Future. Bicycle Federation of America/Pedestrian Federation of America, Sept. 1996, pp. 315-319.
8. Goldsmith, S. A. Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes. National Bicycling and Walking Study, Report FHWA-PD-92-041. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992.
9. Stutts, J. C. Development of a Model Survey for Assessing Levels of Bicycling and Walking. University of North Carolina, Highway Safety Research Center, Nov. 1994.
10. Wilbur Smith Associates. Non-Motorized Access to Transit: Final Report. Prepared for Regional Transportation Authority, Chicago, Ill., July 1996.
11. Hunt, J. D., and J. E. Abraham. Influences on Bicycle Use. Submitted for presentation at the 1998 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, July 1997.
12. Katz, R. Demand for Bicycle Use: A Behavioral Framework and Empirical Analysis for Urban NSW. Doctoral thesis. The Graduate School of Business, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia, Dec. 1996.
13. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Short-Term Travel Model Improvements, Travel Model Improvement Program. Publication DOTT-9505. U.S. Department of Transportation, Oct. 1994.
14. Stein, W. R. Pedestrian and Bicycle Modeling in North America's Urban Areas: A Survey of Emerging Methodologies and MPO Practices. M.S. thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, March 1996.
15. Hunt, J. D., A. T. Brownlee, and L. P. Doblanko. Policy Evaluation Using Edmonton Transport Analysis Model. Presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 1998.
16. Kagan, L. S., W. G. Scott, and U. P. Avin. A Pedestrian Planning Procedures Manual. Reports FHWA-RD-79-45, FHWA-RD-79-46 and FHWA-RD-79-47 (three volumes). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1978.
17. DHV Environment and Infrastructure. QUOVADlS-BICYCLE User's Manual. Amersfoort, The Netherlands, no date.
18. MVA. Leicester Cycle Model Study. Final Report, prepared for Leicestershire County Council, Contract No. 02/C/1428, Oct. 1995.
19. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept. Volume I: Final Report. Publication FHWA-RD-98-XXX. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
20. Landis, B. W., and V. R. Vattikuti. Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. Sprinkle Consulting Engineers, Inc., Tampa, Fla., Sept. 1996.
21. Davies, D. G., M. E. Halliday, M. Mayes, and R. L. Pocock. Attitudes to Cycling: A Qualitative Study and Conceptual Framework. TRL Report 266. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1997.
22. Epperson, B., S. J. Hendricks, and M. York. Estimation of Bicycle Transportation Demand from Limited Data. Compendium of Technical Papers from the Institute of Transportation Engineers 65th Annual Meeting, 1995, pp. 436-440.