Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 415-421

  Sanabria, Daniel ^a,b   Lupiáñez, Juan ^b   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crossmodal integration; Motion perception; Multisensory perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33947330431     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0919-y     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN (2003) Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A 20:1391-1397
2. Bedford FL (2004) Analysis of a constraint on perception, cognition, and development: one object, one place, one time. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 30:907-912
3. Bertenthal B, Banton T, Bradbury A (1993) Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception 22:193-207
4. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433
5. Griffiths TD, Rees G, Rees A, Green GGR, Witton C, Rowe D, et al (1998) Right parietal cortex is involved in the perception of sound movement in humans. Nat Neurosci 1:74-79
6. Heron J, Whitaker D, McGraw PV (2004) Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction. Vision Res 44:2875-2884
7. James TW, Blake R (2004) Perceiving object motion using vision and touch. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:201-207
8. Meyer GF, Wuerger SM (2001) Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport 12:2557-2560
9. Prinzmetal W, McCool C, Park S (2005) Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:73-92
10. Ramachandran VS, Anstis SM (1983) Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception. Vision Res 23:83-85
11. Sanabria D, Correa A, Lupiáñez J, Spence C (2004) Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion. Exp Brain Res 157:537-541
12. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385:308
13. Shimojo S, Shams L (2001) Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:505-509
14. Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A (2004) Multisensory integration of dynamic information. In: Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 49-68
15. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, Kingstone A (2004) Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 30:330-345
16. Watt RJ (1991) Understanding vision. Academic Press, London
17. Welch RB, Warren DH (1980) Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol Bull 88:638-667