Social orderings and the evaluation of public policy

Revue d'Economie Politique

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 37-60

  Maniquet, Francois ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Labor income taxation; Public goods; Social ordering functions

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947288991     PISSN: 03732630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/redp.171.0037     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ARROW K.J. [1963], Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition, New York: Wiley.
2. ARNSPERGER C. [1994], «Envy-freeness and distributive justice», Journal of Economic Surveys 8: pp. 155-186.
3. BOADWAY, R., M. KEEN [2000], «Redistribution», in A.B. Bourguignon, F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. BOADWAY, R., M. MARCHAND, P. PESTIEAU, M. RACIONERO [2002], «Optimal redistribution with heterogeneous preferences for leisure», Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4 (4): pp. 475-498.
5. BOSSERT W., M. FLEURBAEY, D. VAN DE GAER [1999], «Responsibility, Talent, and Compensation: A Second-Best Analysis», Review of Economic Design 4: pp. 35-55.
6. BRUN B. C. AND B. TUNGODDEN [2004], «Non-welfarist theories of justice: Is the «intersection approach» a solution to the indexing impasse?», Social Choice and Welfare 22: pp. 49-60.
7. DALTON H. [19201, «The measurement of the inequality of incomes», Economic Journal 30: pp. 348-361.
8. D'ASPREMONT C. AND L. GEVERS [1977], «Equity and the informational basis of collective choice», Review of Economic Studies 44: pp. 199-209.
9. FLEMING M. [1952], «A Cardinal Concept of Welfare», Quarterly Journal of Economics 66: pp. 366-384.
10. FLEURBAEY M. [2003], «Health, wealth and fairness», Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7: pp. 253-284.
11. FLEURBAEY M. [2005], «The Pazner-Schmeidler social ordering: a defense», Review of Economic Design 9: pp. 145-166.
12. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [1996], «Utilitarianism versus fairness in welfare economics», forthcoming in M. Salles and J. A. Weymark (Eds.), Justice, Political Liberalism and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls, Cambridge U. Press.
13. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [1999], «Fair allocation with unequal production skills: The solidarity approach to compensation», Social Choice and Welfare 16: pp. 569-583.
14. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2001], «Fair social orderings», Economic Theory, forthcoming.
15. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2002], «Help the low skill or let the hardworking thrive: a study of fairness in optimal income taxation», Journal of Public Economic Theory, forthcoming.
16. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2005a], «Fair social orderings with unequal production skills», Social Choice and Welfare, 24: pp. 93-128.
17. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2005b], «Compensation and Responsibility», forthcoming in K. J. Arrow, A. Sen and K. Suzumura, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare.
18. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2005c], «A theory of fairness and social welfare», mimeo.
19. FLEURBAEY M. AND F. MANIQUET [2006], «Fair income tax», Review of Economic Studies 73: pp. 55-83.
20. FLEURBAEY M., K. SUZUMURA and K. TADENUMA [2005], «Arrovian aggregation in economic environments: How much should we know about indifference surfaces?», Journal of Economic Theory 124: pp. 22-44.
21. FLEURBAEY M. AND A. TRANNOY [2003], «The impossibility of a Paretian Egalitarian», Social Choice and Welfare 21: pp. 243-264.
22. FOLEY D. [1967], «Resource allocation and the public sector», Yale Econ. Essays 7: 45-98.
23. HAMMOND P.J. [1976], «Equity, Arrow's conditions and Rawls' difference principle», Econometrica 44: pp. 793-804.
24. HAMMOND P.J. [1979], «Straightforward individual incentive compatibility in large economies», Review of Economic Studies 46: pp. 263-282.
25. HANSSON B. [1973], «The independence condition in the theory of social choice», Theory and Decision 4: pp. 25-49.
26. JACKSON M. [2001], «A crash course in implementation theory,» Social Choice and Welfare 18: pp. 655-708.
27. KOLM S.C. [1966], «The optimal production of social justice,» in H. Guitton and J. Margolis (Eds.), Economie Publique, Paris: CNRS,
28. KOLM S.C., Public Economics, London: Macmillan, 1969, pp. 145-200.
29. KOLM S.C. [1972], «Justice et Equité,» Paris: CNRS, printed in English as «Justice and Equity» Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 1997.
30. LUTTENS, R. I., AND E. OOGHE [2006], «Is it fair to make work pay?» Economica, forthcoming.
31. MANIQUET F. [1999], «L'equité en environnement économique» Revue Economique 50: pp. 787-810.
32. MANIQUET F. [2002], «Social orderings for the assignment of indivisible objects,» mimeo.
33. MANIQUET F. AND Y. SPRUMONT [2004], «Fair production and allocation of a non-rival good», Econometrica 72: pp. 627-640.
34. MANIQUET F. AND Y. SPRUMONT [2005], Welfare egalitarianism in nonrival environments, Journal of Economic Theory 120: pp. 155-174.
35. MASKIN E. AND T. SJOSTROM [2002], «Implementation theory,» in K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen and K. Suzumura (Eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol 2: pp. 237-288, North-Holland: Amsterdam.
36. MIRRLEES J. [1971], «An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation», Review of Economic Studies 38: pp. 175-208.
37. MOULIN, H. [1987], «Egalitarian-equivalent cost sharing of a public good,» Econometrica 55: pp. 963-976.
38. MOULIN H. [1992], «All sorry to disagree: A general principle for the provision of nonrival goods», Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: pp. 37-51.
39. MOULIN H. AND W. THOMSON [1997], «Axiomatic analysis of resource allocation problems», in K. J. Arrow, A. Sen, K. Suzumura (Eds.), Social Choice Reexamined, Vol. 1, London: Macmillan and New-York: St. Martin's Press.
40. PAZNER E. [1979], «Equity, nonfeasible alternatives and social choice: A reconsideration of the concept of social welfare», in J.J. Laffont (Ed.), Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. PAZNER E., D. SCHMEIDLER [1974], «A difficulty in the concept of fairness», Review of Economic Studies 41: pp. 991-993.
42. PAZNER E., D. SCHMEIDLER [1978], «Egalitarian equivalent allocations: A new concept of economic equity», Quarterly Journal of Economics 92: pp. 671-687.
43. PIGOU A.C. [1912], Wealth and Welfare, London: Macmillan.
44. SCHOKKAERT E., D. VAN DE GAER, F. VANDENBROUCKE AND R. I. LUTTENS [2004], «Responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism and optimal linear income taxation», Mathematical Social Sciences 48: pp. 151-182.
45. SPRUMONT Y. [1998], «Equal factor equivalence in economies with multiple public goods», Social Choice and Welfare 15: pp. 543-558.
46. STIGLITZ J.E. [1987], «Pareto efficient and optimal taxation and the New New Welfare Economics», in A.J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 2, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
47. TADENUMA K. [2002], «Efficiency first or equity first? Two principles and rationality of social choice», Journal of Economic Theory 104: pp. 462-472.
48. TADENUMA K. [2005], «Egalitarian-equivalence and the Pareto principle for social preferences», Social Choice and Welfare 24: pp. 455-473.
49. THOMSON W. [2001], The Theory of Fair Allocation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, forthcoming.
50. THOMSON W. ET VARIAN H. [1985], «Theories of Justice Based on Symmetry,» in L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler et H. Sonnenschein (eds), Social Goals and Social Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, pp. 107-129.
51. VARIAN H. [1974], «Efficiency, equity and envy», Journal of Economic Theory 9: pp. 63-91.
52. WEYMARK J.A. [2006], «The normative approach to the measurement of multidimensional inequality», in F. Farina and E. Savaglio (eds), Inequality and Economic Integration, London: Routledge.