A case study on research in engineering education: Designing, testing, and administering the PACES-2 survey on academic integrity

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Finelli, Cynthia J ^a,b   Szwalek, Jamie L ^b   Carpenter, Donald D ^c   Harding, Trevor S ^d  

^a Center for Research on Learning and Teaching North   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Lawrence Technological Univ   (United States)

^d KETTERING UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic integrity; Cheating; Research in engineering education; Survey development

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY; CHEATING; SURVEY DEVELOPMENT; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION USE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 33947256141     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Ajzen, I. "The Theory of Planned Behavior." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211, 1991.
2. Armitage, C.J., and M. Conner. "Predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour: The role of questionnaire format and social desirability." Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9: 261-272, 1999.
3. Armstrong, J.S. and T.S. Overton. "Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys." Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 1977.
4. Baird, J.S. "Current trends in college cheating." Psychology in the Schools, 17(4): 515-522, 1980,
5. Beck, L., and I. Ajzen. "Predicting dishonest actions using the Theory of Planned Behavior." Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3): 285-301, 1991.
6. Bowers, W.J. Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, New York, NY. 1964.
7. Brown, B.S. "A comparison of the academic ethics of graduate business, education and engineering students." College Student Journal, 30(Sept. 1996): 294-301, 1996.
8. Church, A.M. "The effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis." Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 1993.
9. Creswell, J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 1998.
10. Gall, M.D., J.P. Gall, and W.R. Borg. Educational Research: An Introduction (Seventh Edition). Pearson Education, Inc., Boston, MA. 2003.
11. Harp, J., and P. Taietz. "Academic integrity and social structure: A study of cheating among college students." Social Problems, 13(4): 365-373, 1996.
12. Jackson, C.J., S.Z. Levine, A. Furnham, and N. Burr. "Predictors of cheating behavior at a university: A lesson from the psychology of work." Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5): 1031-1046, 2002.
13. McCabe, D.L. "Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors." Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 433-445, 1997.
14. McMillan, J.H. and S. Schumacher. Research in Education (Fourth Edition). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc., New York. 1997.
15. National Research Council. Scientific Research in Education. Shavelson, R.J. and L. Towne, eds. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 2002.
16. Newstead, S.E., A. Franklyn-Stokes, and P. Armstead. "Individual differences in student cheating." Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2): 229-241, 1996.
17. Olds, B.M., B.M. Moskal, and R.L. Miller. "Assessment in engineering education: Evolution, approaches, and future collaborations." Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1): 13-25, 2005.
18. Paulhus, D.L. "Measurement and control of response bias." In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Robinson, J.P. and L.S. Wrightsman, eds. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA. 1991.
19. Radcliff, D.F., and L. Jolly. "Dilemmas in framing research studies in engineering education." Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2003.
20. Rawwas, M.Y.A., and H.R. Isakson. "Ethics of tomorrow's business managers: the influence of personal beliefs and values, individual characteristics, and situational factors." Journal of Education for Business, 27, 2000.
21. Rest, J.R., and D. Narvaez. Guide for DIT-2. Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN. 1998.
22. Rest, J.R., D. Narvaez, J. Thomas, and M.J. Bebeau. "DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment." Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1): 5-28, 1999.
23. Singer, E., J. Van Hoewyk, N. Gebler, T. Raghunathan, and K. McGonagle. "The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys." Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 1999.
24. Steffe, L. and P.W. Thompson. "Teaching experimental methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements." In Handbook of Research Design in Math and Science Education, Kelly, A.E. and R.A. Lesh, eds. 2000.
25. Suskie, L.A. Questionnaire Survey Research: What works? (Second Edition). Florida State University: Association for Institutional Research, 1996.
26. Yu, J. and H. Cooper. "A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires." Journal of Market Research, 20, 1983.