Multi-linearity algorithm for wall slip in two-dimensional gap flow

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2469-2484

  Ma, G J ^a   Wu, C W ^a   Zhou, P ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Finite element algorithm; Quadratic programming; Wall slip

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; ITERATIVE METHODS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; SHEAR STRESS; WALL FLOW;

FLUID PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SLIP CONTROL EQUATION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL GAP FLOW; WALL SLIP;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; ITERATIVE METHODS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; SHEAR STRESS; WALL FLOW;

EID: 33947236892     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1848     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kassner ME, Nemat-Nasser S, Suo Z et al. New directions in mechanics. Mechanics of Materials 2005; 37:231-259.
2. Neto C, Evans DR, Craig VSJ et al. Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies. Reports on Progress in Physics 2005; 68:2859-2897.
3. Pit R, Hervet H, Leger L. Direct experimental evidence of slip in hexadecane: solid interfaces. Physical Review Letters 2000; 85:980-983.
4. Craig VSJ, Neto C, Williams DRM. Shear-dependent boundary slip in an aqueous Newtonian liquid. Physical Review Letters 2001; 87:054504.
5. Zhu YX, Granick S. Rate-dependent slip of Newtonian liquid at smooth surfaces. Physical Review Letters 2001; 87:096105.
6. Zhu YX, Granick S. Limits of the hydrodynamic no-slip boundary condition. Physical Review Letters 2002; 88:106102.
7. Cottin-Bizonne C, Jurine S, Baudry J et al. Nanorheology: an investigation of the boundary condition at hydrophobic and hydrophilic interfaces. European Physical Journal E 2002; 9:47-53.
8. Choi CH, Johan K, Westin A et al. Apparent slip flows in hydrophilic and hydrophobic microchannels. Physics of Fluids 2003; 15:2897-2902.
9. Henry CL, Neto C, Evans DR, Biggs S, Craig VSJ. The effect of surfactant adsorption on liquid boundary slippage. Physica A 2004; 339:60-65.
10. Bonaccurso E, Kappl M, Butt HJ. Hydrodynamic force measurements: boundary slip of hydrophilic surfaces and electrokinetic effects. Physical Review Letters 2002; 88:076103.
11. Bonaccurso E, Butt HJ, Craig VSJ. Surface roughness and hydrodynamic boundary slip of a Newtonian fluid in a completely wetting system. Physical Review Letters 2003; 90:144501.
12. Navier M. Mmoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Memoires de l' Academie Royal des sciences l' institute France 1823; 6:389-440.
13. Maxwell JC. On stresses in rarified gases arising from inequalities of temperature. Philosophy Transaction of Royal Society London 1879; 170:231-256.
14. White FM. Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, 1974.
15. Lockerby D, Reese JM, Emerson DR, Barber RW. Velocity boundary condition at solid walls in rarefied gas calculations. Physical Review E 2004; 70:017303.
16. Thompson PA, Troian SM. A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces. Nature 1997; 389:360-362.
17. Bair S, Winer WO. Shear strength measurements of lubricants at high pressure. ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology 1979; 101:251-256.
18. Bair S, Winer WO. The high shear stress rheology of liquid lubricants at pressures of 2 to 200MPa. ASME Journal of Tribology 1990; 112:246-252.
19. Bair S, Winer WO. The high pressure high shear stress rheology of shear stress rheology of liquid lubricants. ASME Journal of Tribology 1992; 114:1-13.
20. Höglund E. The relation between lubricant shear stress strength analyzer and chemical composition of the base oil. Wear 1989; 130:213-224.
21. Östensen JO, Wikstrom V, Höglund E. Interaction effects between temperature, pressure and type of base oil on lubricant shear strength coefficient. Tribologia Finnish Journal of Tribology 1993; 11:123-132.
22. Kato K, Iwasaki T, Kato M, Inoue K. Evaluation of limiting shear stress of lubricants by roller test. JSME Inernational Journal Series C 1993: 36:512-522.
23. Wikstrom V, Höglund E. Investigation of parameter affecting the limiting shear stress-pressure coefficient: a new model incorporating temperature. ASME Journal of Tribology 1994; 116:612-620.
24. Jacobson BO, Hamrock BJ. Non-Newtonian fluid model incorporated into elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rectangular contacts. ASME Journal of Tribology 1984; 106:275-282.
25. Stahl J, Jacobson BO. A lubricant model considering wall-slip in EHL line contacts. ASME Journal of Tribology 2003; 125:523-532.
26. Strozzi A. Formulation of three lubrication problems in terms of complementarity. Wear 1975; 104:103-119.
27. Wu CW et al. Parametric variational principle for viscoplastic lubrication model. ASME Journal of Tribology 1992; 113:731-735.
28. Spikes HA. The half-wetted bearing. Part 1: extended Reynolds equation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2003; 217:1-14.
29. Spikes HA. The half-wetted bearing. Part 2: potential application in low load contacts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2003; 217:15-26.
30. Cameron A. Basic Lubrication Theory (3rd edn). Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester, 1981.
31. Huebner KH. The Finite Element Method for Engineers. Wiley: New York, 1975.
32. Oh KP, Huebner KH. Solution of the elastohydrodynamic finite journal bearing problem. ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology 1973; 95:187-194.
33. Boot JCG. Quadratic Programming. Algorithms-Anomalies-Applications: Amsterdam, 1964.
34. Wu CW, Ma GJ. On the boundary slip of fluid flow. Science in China G 2005; 48:178-187.
35. Wilson WRD, Huang XB. Viscoplastic behavior of a silicone oil in a metalforming inlet zone. ASME Journal of Tribology 1989; 111:585-590.