Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 2: Root resorption

Dental Traumatology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 105-113

  Cohenca, Nestor ^a   Simon, James H ^b   Mathur, Aeshna ^b   Malfaz, Jose Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental trauma; Diagnosis; Digital imaging; Root resorption

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; MALE; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH INJURY; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL PULP NECROSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBULAR FRACTURES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROOT RESORPTION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH INJURIES;

EID: 33947226799     PISSN: 16004469     EISSN: 16009657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00546.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100(Suppl. 2):S75-96.
2. Akdeniz BG, Sogur E. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings. Int Endod J 2005;38:397-401.
3. Nair MK, Nair UDP, Grondahl HG, Webber RL, Wallace JA. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:375-9.
4. Tanrikulu R, Erol B. Comparison of computed tomography with conventional radiography for midfacial fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:141-6.
5. Abreu M Jr, Yi-Ching L, Abreu AL. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:93-7.
6. Klenk G, Kovacs A. Do we need three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial surgery? J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:842-50; discussion 850.
7. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-34.
8. Danforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:847-52.
9. Marmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:28-31.
10. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558-64.
11. Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: Traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol 2007;23:95-104.
12. Eggers G, Mukhamadiev D, Hassfeld S. Detection of foreign bodies of the head with digital volume tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:74-9.
13. Mah J, Enciso R, Jorgensen M. Management of impacted cuspids using 3-D volumetric imaging. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:835-41.
14. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30.
15. Erickson M, Caruso JM, Leggitt L. Newtom QR-DVT 9000 imaging used to confirm a clinical diagnosis of iatrogenic mandibular nerve paresthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:843-5.
16. Enciso R, Memon A, Mah J. Three-dimensional visualization of the craniofacial patient: volume segmentation, data integration and animation. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6(Suppl. 1):66-71; discussion 179-82.
17. Enciso R, Memon A, Fidaleo DA, Neumann U, Mah J. The virtual craniofacial patient: 3D jaw modeling and animation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003;94:65-71.
18. Holberg C, Steinhauser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:434-44.
19. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:803-11.
20. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod 2006;32:833-7.
21. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Inamoto K, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod 2006;32:583-7.
22. Bakland LK, Andreasen JO. Dental traumatology: essential diagnosis and treatment planning. Endodontic Topics 2004;7:14-34.
23. Heithersay GS. Invasive cervical resorption. Endodontic Topics 2004;7:73-92.
24. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4.
25. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: the basic science aspects. Angle Orthod 2002;72:175-9.
26. Akpek S, Brunner T, Benndorf G, Strother C. Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:10-3.
27. Kiessling F, Greschus S, Lichy MP, Bock M, Fink C, Vosseler S et al. Volumetric computed tomography (VCT): a new technology for noninvasive, high-resolution monitoring of tumor angiogenesis. Nat Med 2004;10:1133-8.
28. Hannig C, Dullin C, Hulsmann M, Heidrich G. Three-dimensional, non-destructive visualization of vertical root fractures using flat panel volume detector computer tomography: an ex vivo in vitro case report. Int Endod J 2005;38:904-13.