Work in progress - case study of a technological literacy and non-majors engineering course

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Krupczak Jr , John J ^a   Vanderstoep, Scott ^a   Wessman, Leslie ^a   Makowski, Nathaniel ^a   Otto, Catherine A ^a   Van Dyk, Kristi ^a  

^a HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering for non engineers; Nonengineering students; Pre service teachers; Technological literacy

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER TECHNOLOGICAL DEVICES; NONENGINEERING STUDENTS; PRE SERVICE TEACHERS; TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

CURRICULA;

EID: 33947216571     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Wulf, W.A., "The Case for Technological Literacy," National Academy of Engineering, National Academies Op-Ed Service Archive, September 20, (2002).
2. Person, G., and A.T.Young, (editors), "Technically Speaking: Why all Americans Need to Know More About Technology." Washington, D.C. National Academy Press, (2002).
3. "Standards for Technological Literacy," International Technology Education Association, Reston, VA (2000).
4. Krupczak J.J., "Science and Technology of Everyday Life: A course in technology for liberal arts students," American Society for Engineering Education Ann. Conf. Proc. (1996).
5. Krupczak, J.J "Demystifying Technology," American Society for Engineering Education, PRISM, October (1997) 30-34.
6. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Technical Report No. 91B-004. National Center for the Improvement of Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
7. VanderStoep, S.W., Pintrich, P.R., and Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345-362.