On quantitative measures of indirect interactions

Ecology Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 264-271

  Okuyama, Toshinori ^a   Bolker, Benjamin M ^a  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Density mediated indirect interaction; DMII; Experimental design; TMII; Trait mediated indirect interaction

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONSPECIFIC; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33947213328     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01019.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrams, P.A. (1992). Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptations. Am. Nat., 140, 573-600.
2. Abrams, P.A. (1995). Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. Am. Nat., 146, 112-134.
3. Abrams, P.A. (1999). The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am. Nat., 153, 83-97.
4. Abrams, P.A. (2001). Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter- and intraspecific interactions: an assessment of three methods. Ecol. Lett., 4, 166-175.
5. Abrams, P.A., Menge, B.A., Mittelbach, G.G., Spiller, D.A. & Yodzis, P. (1996). The role of indirect effects in food webs. In: Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics (eds Polis, G.A. & Winemiller, K.). Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, pp. 371-395.
6. Billick, I. & Case, T.J. (1994). Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecology, 75, 1529-1543.
7. Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Křivan, V., Rowe, L. & Schmitz, O. (2003). Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology, 84, 1101-1114.
8. Briggs, C.J. & Borer, E.T. (2005). Why short-term experiments may not allow long-term predictions about intraguild predation. Ecol. Appl., 15, 1111-1117.
9. Diehl, S., Cooper, S.D., Kratz, K.W., Nisbet, R.M., Roll, S.K., Wiseman, S.W. et al. (2000). Effects of multiple, predator-induced behaviors on short-term producer-grazer dynamics in open systems. Am. Nat., 156, 293-313.
10. Grabowski, J.H. & Kimbro, D.L. (2005). Predator-avoidance behavior extends trophic cascade to refuge habitat. Ecology, 86, 1312-1319.
11. Griffin, C.A.M. & Thaler, J.S. (2006). Insect predators affect plant resistance via density- and trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett., 9, 335-343.
12. Huang, C. & Sih, A. (1991). Experimental studies on direct and indirect interactions in a three trophic-level stream system. Oecologia, 85, 530-536.
13. Inouye, B.D. (2001). Response surface experimental designs for investigating interspecific competition. Ecology, 82, 2696-2706.
14. Juliano, S.A. & Williams, F.M. (1987). A comparison of methods for estimating the functional-response parameters of the random predator equation. J. Anim. Ecol., 56, 641-653.
15. Křivan, V. & Sirot, E. (2004). Do short-term behavioral response of consumers in tri-trophic food chains persist at population time-scale? Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 1063-1081.
16. Luttbeg, B., Rowe, L. & Mangel, M. (2003). Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects. Ecology, 84, 1140-1150.
17. Miner, B.G., Sultan, S.E., Morgan, S.G., Padilla, D.K. & Relyea, R.A. (2005). Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 685-692.
18. Peacor, S.D. (2003). Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density: a new mechanism arising from predation risk assessment. Oikos, 100, 409-415.
19. Peacor, S.D. & Werner, E.E. (2001). The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 3904-3908.
20. Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I. & Bernard, M.F. (2005). Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 86, 501-509.
21. Schmitz, O.J., Krivan, V. & Ovadia, O. (2004). Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett., 7, 153-163.
22. Trussell, G.C., Ewanchuk, P.J., Bertness, M.D. & Silliman, B.R. (2004). Trophic cascades in rocky shore tide pools: distinguishing lethal and nonlethal effects. Oecologia, 139, 427-432.
23. Trussell, G.C., Ewanchuk, P.J. & Matassa, C.M. (2006). Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and denisity-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett., 9, 1245-1252.
24. van Veen, F.J., van Holland, P.D. & Godfray, H.C.J. (2005). Stable coexistence in insect communities due to density- and trait-mediated indirect effects. Ecology, 86, 3182-3189.
25. Welsh, A.H., Peterson, A.T. & Altman, S.A. (1998). The fallacy of averages. Am. Nat., 132, 277-288.
26. Werner, E.E. & Peacor, S.D. (2003). A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84, 1083-1100.
27. Werner, E.E. & Peacor, S.D. (2006). Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivity. Ecology, 87, 347-361.
28. Wissinger, S. & McGrady, J. (1993). Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects on shared prey. Ecology, 74, 207-218.
29. Wodjak, J.M. & Luttbeg, B. (2005). Relative strength of trait-mediated and density-mediated indirect effects of a predator vary with resource levels in a freshwater food chain. Oikos, 111, 592-598.
30. Wootton, J.T. (1994). Putting the pieces together: testing the independence of interactions among organisms. Ecology, 75, 1544-1551.