Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 191-207

  Salter, Katherine ^a   Jutai, J W ^a,b   Teasell, R ^a,b   Foley, N C ^a   Bitensky, J ^a  

^a ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONSENSUS; CONVALESCENCE; DEPRESSION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 16344377715     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280400008537     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. van der Putten JMF, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999:66:480-484.
2. Dijkers M, Kropp GC, Esper RM, Yavuzer G, et al. Reporting on reliability and validity of outcome measures in medcial rehabilitation research. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002:24:819-827.
3. Frytak J. Measurement. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement 2000:4:15-31.
4. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000:81:S15-S20.
5. Johnston MV, Keith RA, Hinderer SR. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992:73:3-23.
6. Law M. Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1987:54:133-138.
7. Teasell R, issue editor. Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review: Part I. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2003:10:1-78.
8. Teasell R, ie. Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review: Part II. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2003:10:1-129.
9. Jutai J, Teasell R. The necessity and limitations of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2003:10:71-78.
10. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
11. World Health Organization. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
12. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical Rehabilitations Outcome Measures. A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision-Making. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Physiotherapy Association, 2002.
13. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003:25:628-634.
14. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003:25:565-571.
15. Brenner MH, Curbow B, Legro MW. The proximal-distal continuum of multiple health outcome measures: the case of cataract surgery. Medical Care 1995:33:AS236-244.
16. Roberts L, Counsell R. Assessment of clinical outcomes in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1998:28:986-991.
17. Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2001:24:95-101.
18. van Wijck FMJ, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Barnes MP. Assessing motor deficits in neurological rehabilitation: patterns of instrument usage. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2001:15:23-30.
19. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001:33:278.
20. Sanders C, Egger M, Donovan J, Tallon D, Frankel S. Reporting on quality of life in randomized controlled trials: a bibiographic study. British Medical Journal 1998:317:1191-1194.
21. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials. A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000:31: 1429-1438.
22. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of Measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000:31:2004-2010.
23. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal 2002:324:1417-1422.
24. Granlund M, Eriksson L, Ylven R. Utility of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health's participation dimension in assigning ICF codes to items from extant rating instruments. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004:36:130-137.
25. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the International classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002:34:205-210.
26. Law M. Evidence-based Rehabilitation. A Guide to Practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Press, 2002.
27. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluation of patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment 1998:2:1-74.
28. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health. A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
29. Lorentz WJ, Scanlan JM, Borson S. Brief screening tests for dementia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2002:47:723-733.
30. Segal ME, Gillard M, Schall RR. Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the Functional Independence Measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996:75:208-212.
31. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997:28:1541-1549.
32. Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S, Dozono K. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997:11:28-35.
33. McGinnis GE, Seward ML, DeJong G, Osberg S. Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitaiton departemtns using self-report Barthel. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1986:67:125.
34. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. International Disabilities Studies 1990:12:6-9.
35. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995:76:406-412.
36. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999:21:258-268.
37. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JL, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989:41:304-311.
38. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, et al. Issues for Selection of Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation: ICF Activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, In Press 2004.
39. Gowland C, Stratford PW, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993:24:58-63.
40. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF36) I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992:30:473-483.
41. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999:30:2131-2140.
42. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Biller J. Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients. Neurology 1999:53:1839-1843.
43. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, et al. Issues for Selection of Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disability and Rehabilitation, In Press, 2004.
44. Beck AT, Ware CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961:4:561-571.
45. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 1988:8:77-100.
46. Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90 and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics 2002:43:386-393.
47. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975:7:13-31.
48. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2002:16:232-240.
49. Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia. Brain 1951:74:443.
50. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association 1966:46:357.
51. Chae J, Labatia I, Yang G. Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis: concurrent validity of the Arm Motor Ability Test. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003:82:1-8.
52. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994:25:1181-1188.
53. Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1980:7:85-93.
54. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: Comparison of the Fugl-Meyer assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994:75:1206-1212.
55. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Assessments of motor function post stroke: A review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 2001:19:1-22.
56. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001:33: 110-113.
57. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002:33:1022-1027.
58. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975:12:198.
59. Dick JPR, Builoff RJ, Stewart A, Blackstock J, Bielawska C, Paul EA, et al. Mini-mental State Examination in neurological patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1984:47:499.
60. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1992:40:922-935.
61. Teng EL, Chui HC. The modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1987:48:314-318.
62. Grace J, Nadler JD, White DA, Guilmette TJ, Giuliano AJ, Monsch AU, et al. Folstein vs. Modified Mini-Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke. Archives of Neurology 1995:52:477-484.
63. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
64. Bleecker ML, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas C, Agnew J. Age-specific norms for the Mini Mental State Examination. Neurology 1988:38:1565-1568.
65. Agrell B, Dehlin O. Mini Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke patients. Validity, differences between subgroups of patients, and relationships to somatic and mental variables. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2000:12:439-444.
66. de Koning I, van Kooten F, Koudstaal PJ. Value of screening instruments int he diagnosis of post-stroke dementia. Haemostasis 1998:28:158-166.
67. Suhr JA, Grace J. Brief cognitive screening of right hemisphere stroke: relation to functional outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999:80:773-776.
68. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964:192:540-542.
69. Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CIM, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitatons of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999:13:373-383.
70. Pandyan AD, Price CIM, Rodgers H, Barnes MP, Johnson GR. Biomechanical examination of a commonly used measure of spasticity. Clinical Biomechanics 2001:16:859-865.
71. Damiano DL, Quinlivan JM, Owen BF, Payne P, Nelson KC, Abel MF. What does the Ashworth Scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2002:44: 112-118.
72. Pandyan AD, Price CIM, Barnes MP, Johnson GR. A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003:17:290-294.
73. Blackburn M, van Vliet PMS. Reliability of measurements obtained with the Modified Ashworth Scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Physical Therapy 2002:82:25-34.
74. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Inter rater reliability of a modified Ashwroth Scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy 1987:67:206-207.
75. Haas BM, Bergstrom E, Jamous A, Bennie A. The inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasicity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1996:34:560-564.
76. Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale as clinical tool for assessing poststroke spasticity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999:1999:1013-1016.
77. Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Smith TL, et al. Reliability of measurement of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age and Aging 2000:29:223-228.
78. Colarusso RP, Hammill DD. Motor-free Visual Perception Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications, 1972.
79. Su CY, Chang JJ, Chen HM, Su CJ, Chien TH, Huang MH. Perceptual differences between stroke patients with cerebral infarction and intracerebral hemorrhage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000:81:714.
80. Mercier L, Desrosier J, Hebert R, Rochette A, Dubois MF. Normative data for the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Vertical. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 2001:19:39-50.
81. Bouska MJ, Kwatney E. Manual for the Application of the Motor-free Visual Perception Test to the Adult Population. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Rehabilitation Research and Training Centre, 1982.
82. Brown GT, Rodger S, Davis A. Motor-free visual perception test - revised: an overview and critique. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003:66:159-167.
83. Mazer BL, Korner-Bitensky N, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998:79:743-750.
84. Mercier L, Hebert R, Gauthier L. Motor free visual perception test: impact of vertical answer cards position on performance of adults with hemispatial neglect. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1995:15:223-226.
85. Hseuh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. Journal of the Formosa Medical Association 2001:100:526-532.
86. Wolfe CDA, Taub NA, Woodrow EJ, Burney PGJ. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients. Stroke 1991:22:1242-1244.
87. Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, Langdon DW, et al. Evidence-based measurement. Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation. Neurology 2001:57:644.
88. Cohen MI, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000:81:S21-S29.
89. Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Interpreting validity indexes for diagnostic tests: an illustration using the Berg Balance Test. Physical Therapy 1999:79:939-948.
90. Snyder AG, Stanley MA, Novy DM, Averill PM, Beck JG. Measures of depression in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a psychometric evaluation. Depression and Anxiety 2000:11:120.
91. Helm HW, Boward MD. Factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory in a university sample. Psychological Reports 2003:92:53-61.
92. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bravo G, Boutin C. Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002:24:774-785.
93. Beck AT, Beck RW. Screening depressed patients in family practice: A rapid technique. Postgraduate Medicine 1972:52:85.
94. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy 1983:63:1606-1610.
95. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Physical Therapy 1993:73:447-454.
96. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Shapiro SH. Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. Stroke 1990:21:731-739.
97. Dettman MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1987:66:77-90.
98. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988:69: 195-197.
99. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992:23:1084-1089.
100. Shelton F, Volpe BT, Reding M. Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2001:15:237.
101. Bernspang B, Asplund K, Eriksson S, Fugl-Meyer AR. Motor and perceptual impairments in acute stroke patients: effects on self-care ability. Stroke 1987:18:1081-1086.
102. Molloy DW, Standish TIM. A guide to the standardized Mini Mental State Examination. International Psychogeriatrics 1997:9:87-94.
103. Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Tabatabaei R, Ekuklu G, Kokino S. Cognitive evaluation and functional outcome after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001:80:410-415.
104. Allison SC, Abraham LD, Peterson CL. Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of plantarflexor muscle spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of International Rehabilitation Research 1996:19: 67-78.
105. Sloan RL, Sinclair E, Thompson J, Taylor S, Pentland B. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1992:15:161.
106. Nuyens G, de Weerdt W, Ketelaer P, Feys H, De Wolf L, Hantson L, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth Scale in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation 1994:8:286-292.
107. Brashear A, Zafone R, Corcoran M, Glavez-Jimenez N, Gracies JM, Gordon MF, et al. Inter and intrarater reliability of the disability assessment scale in patients with upper limb post-stroke spasticity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002:83:1349-1354.
108. Lee KC, Carson L, Kinnin E, Patterson V. The Ashworth Scale: A reliable and reproducible method of measuring spasticity. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation 1989:3: 205-209.
109. Cate Y, Richards L. Relationship between performance on tests of basic visual functions and visual-perceptual processing in persons after brain injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000:54:326-334.
110. Korner-Bitensky N, Mazer BL, Sofer S, Gelina I, Meyer MB, Morrison C, et al. Visual testing for readiness to drive after stroke: a multicenter study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000:79:259.
111. York CD, Cermak SA. Visual perception and praxis in adults after stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1995:49:550.
112. Colarusso RP, Hammill DD. Motor-free Visual Perception Test-revised. Novato CA: Academic Therapy Publications, 1996.
113. House A, Dennism M, Mogridge L, Warlow C, Hawton K, Jones L. Mood disorders in the year after first stroke. The British Journal of Psychiatry 1991:158:83-92.