Microscopic analysis of subcutaneous reactions to endodontic sealer implants in rats

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 171-177

  Batista, Renata F C ^a   Hidalgo, Miriam M ^a   Hernandes, Luzmarina ^a   Consolaro, Alberto ^b   Velloso, Tânia R G ^b   Cuman, Roberte K N ^a   Caparroz Assef, Silvana M ^a   Bersani Amado, Ciomar A ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

AH Plus; Biocompatibility; Endofill; Endomethasone; Sealer 26

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; HISTOLOGY; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PATHOLOGY;

AH PLUS; ENDOFILL; ENDOMETHASONE; SEALER 26;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

GUTTA PERCHA; POLYETHYLENE; SEALANT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; RAT; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE REACTION; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

ANIMALS; INFLAMMATION; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE;

EID: 33947198686     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30918     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Valera MC. Estudo da compatibilidade biológica de alguns cimentos endodônticos à base de hidróxido de cálcio e um cimento de ionômero de vidro. Avaliação do selamento marginal apical e análise morfológica por microscopia de força atômica. Doutorado tese. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, Brasil, 1995.
2. Estrela C, Figueiredo JA. Endodontia: Princípios Biológicos e Mecânicos, 1st ed. São Paulo, Brasil: Artes Médicas; 1999.
3. Berger CR. Obturação dos canais radiculares. In: Alves FL, editor. Endodontia Clínica, 1 edição. São Paulo, Brasil: Pancast Editora; 2002. p 353-415.
4. Yesilsoy C, Koren LZ, Morse DR, Kobayashi C. A comparative tissue toxicity evaluation of established and newer root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1988;65:459-467.
5. Soares IJ, Goldberg F. Endodontia: Técnicas e Fundamentos, 1 edição. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Artes Médicas Sul; 2001.
6. Schwarze T, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. Long-term cytocompatibility of various endodontic sealers using a new root canal model. J Endod 2002;28:749-753.
7. Ranade MP, Kamra AI. A comparative tissue toxicity evaluation of four endodontic materials. Endodontology 2003;15:7-12.
8. Spångberg L, Langeland K. Biologic effects of dental materials: Toxicity of root canal filling materials on Hella cells in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1973;35: 402-414.
9. Hauman CHJ, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review, part 2: Root canal filling materials. Int Endod J 2003;36:147-160.
10. Leonardo MR, Salgado AAM, Silva LAB, Filho MT. Apical and periapical repair of dog's teeth with periapical lesions after endodontic treatment with different root canal sealers. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003;17:69-74.
11. Silva LAB, Leonardo MR, Faccioli LH, Figueiredo F. Inflammatory response to calcium hydroxide based root canal sealers. J Endod 1997;23:86-90.
12. Kaplan AE, Ormaechea MF, Picca M, Canzobre MC, Ubios AM. Rheological properties and biocompatibility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2003;36:527-532.
13. Bhambhani SM, Bolanos OR. Tissue reactions to endodontic materials implanted in the mandibles of guinea pigs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1993;76:493-501.
14. Bernáth M, Szabó J. Tissue reaction initiated by different sealers. Int Endod J 2003;36:256-261.
15. Ørstavik D, Mjör IA. Usage test of four endodontic sealers in Macaca fascicularis monkeys. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1992;3:337-344.
16. Gerosa R, Menegazzi G, Borin M, Cavalleri G. Cytotoxic evaluation of six root canal sealers. J Endod 1995;21:446-448.
17. International Standards Organization. Biological testing of dental materials and devices. ISO 10993-6 draft document. 1994.
18. Xavier MJ, Berbert A, Alle N, Bramante CM, Lopes ES. Comportamento histopatológico do tecido conjuntivo de Rattus norvegicus var. Albinus a implantes dos cimentos para obturação de canais: Rickert, AH-26 e Endométhasone. Rev Estomatol Cult 1974;8:61-71.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categotical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
20. Ørstavik D, Mjör IA. Histopathology and x-ray microanalysis of the subcutaneous tissue response to endodontic sealers. J Endod 1988;14:13-23.
21. Figueiredo JA, Pesce HF, Gioso MA, Figueiredo MAS. The histological effects of four endodontic sealers implanted in the oral mucosa: Submucous injection versus implant in polyethylene tubes. Int Endod J 2001;34:377-385.
22. Barbosa SV, Araki K, Spångberg LS. Cytotoxicity of some modified root canal sealers and their leachable components. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1993;75: 357-361.
23. Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, Almeida WA, Utrilla LS. Tissue response to an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:28-32.
24. Morse DR, Wilcko JM, Pullon PA, Furst ML, Passo AS. A comparative tissue toxicity evaluation of the liquid components of gutta-percha root canal sealers. J Endod 1981;7:545-550.
25. Kolokouris I, Economides N, Beltes P, Vlemmas. In vivo comparison of the biocompatibility of two root canal sealers implanted into the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 1998;24:82-85.
26. Molnar EJ. Residual eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol compounds. J Dent Res 1967;46:645-649.
27. Becker RM, Hume WR, Wolinsky LE. Release of eugenol from mixtures of zoe in vitro. J Pedod 1983;8:71-77.
28. Economides N, Kotsaki-Kovatsi VP, Poulopoulos A, Kolokuris I, Rozos G, Shore R. Experimental study of the biocompatibility of four root canal sealers and their influence on the zinc and calcium content of several tissues. J Endod 1995;21:122-127.
29. Kozam G, Mantell GM. The effect of eugenol on oral mucous membranes. J Dent Res 1978;57:954-957.
30. Lindqvist L, Otteskog P. Eugenol: Liberation from dental materials and effect on human diploid fibroblast. Scand J Dent Res 1981;88:552-556.
31. Araki K, Suda H, Barbosa SV, Spångberg LSW. Reduced cytotoxicity of a root canal sealer through eugenol substitution. J Endod 1993;19:554-557.
32. Ørstavik D, Hongalo JK. Mutagenicity of endodontic sealers. Biomaterials 1985;6:129-132.
33. Murphy WM. An in vitro model for testing biocompatibility of endodontic materials to bone. Biomaterials 1985;6:427-430.
34. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, Mello W. Resposta do tecido conjuntivo subcutâneo do rato ao implante de alguns materiais obturadores de canal. Rev Fac Odontol Araçatuba 1973;2: 217-223.
35. Sunzel B, Söderberg TA, Johansson A, Hallmans G, Gref R. The protective effect of zinc on rosin and resin acid toxicity in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:20-28.
36. Ersev H, Schmalz G, Bayirli G, Schweikl H. Cytotoxic and mutagenic potencies of various root canal filling materials in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells in vitro. J Endod 1999;25:359-363.
37. Huang TH, Yang JL, Li H, Kao CT. The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. Biomaterials 2002;23:77-83.
38. Erausquin J. Periapical tissue reaction to root canal fillings with zinc, titanium, lead and aluminum oxides. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1970;30:545-554.
39. Schwarze T, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. The cellular compatibility of five endodontic sealers during the setting period. J Endod 2002;28:784-786.
40. Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, Filho MT, Silva RS. Release of formaldehyde by 4 endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:221-225.