Evaluation of the efficacy of blood glucose home monitoring devices

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Bastanhagh, Mohammad Hassan ^a   Shirvan, Adeleh Rezagholizadeh ^a   Heshmat, Ramin ^a   Khalilifard, Alireza ^a   Keshtkar, Abbasali ^a   Larijani, Bagher ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Blood glucose self monitoring; Correlation; Diabetes mellitus; Iran

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HOME DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HOME MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33947188474     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: 16433750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. http://www.eatlas.idf.org/Prevalence. (9/4/2006)
2. Rajab A: Diabetes top priority for Iranian National Advisory Committee. Diabetes Voice, 2001; 46: 37-38
3. Samuel DJ: DCCT results and diabetes care in developing countries. Diabetes Care 1995; 18 (3): 416-17
4. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28(11): S4-S36
5. Monnier L, Colette C, Lapinski H, Boniface H: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetic patients: from the least common denominator to the greatest common multiple. Diabetes Metab, 2004; 30: 113-19
6. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med, 1993; 329: 977-86
7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (UKPDS): Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet, 1998; 352(9131): 837-53
8. Faas A, Schellevis FG, Van Eijk JTM: The efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in NIDDM. Diabetes Care, 1997; 20: 1482-86
9. Wen L, Parchman ML, Linn WD, Lee S: Association between self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2004; 61(22): 2401-5
10. Welschen LM, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G et al: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Using Insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28(6): 1510-17
11. American Diabetes Association: Bedside blood glucose monitoring in hospitals. Diabetes Care, 1998; 21: S78
12. Bogdan S, Naskalski JW: Analytical performance of glucometers used for routine glucose self-monitoring of diabetic patients. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2003; 331: 29-35
13. American Diabetes Association: Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care, 1996; 19(Suppl.1): S62-S66
14. http://www.fda.gov/diabetes/glucose.html (9/4/2006)
15. Rheney CC, Kirk JK: Performance of three blood glucose meters. Ann Pharmacother, 2000; 34(3): 317-21
16. Philip B, Michele F, Marie A et al: Evolution of analytical performance in portable glucose meters in the last decade. Diabetes Care, 2003; 26(4): 1170-75
17. www.betachek.com/visual.htm (10April 2005)
18. www.labsystems.roche.com (16 May 2005)
19. Sacks DB: Carbohydrate, in: Tietz, Textbook of Clinical Chemistry: Brutis CA, Ashwood ER, USA, W. B. SAUNDERS Company, 1999; 777-79
20. Bland JM, Altman DG: Comparing methods of measurement. Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet, 1995; 346: 1085-87
21. E-shopping@aarogya.com (15 May 2005)
22. Batki AD, Thomason HL, Holder R et al: Brief assessment of the Menarini GlucoMen PC blood glucose meter. Medical Devices Agency evaluation report 2000 (MDA /2000/34)
23. www.moldan.md (16 May 2005)
24. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA et al: American Diabetes Association: Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2004; 7(Suppl.1): S91-S93
25. Usmmani HA, Khan II, Mughal FH: A study of the accuracy of the precision Q.I.D. glucometer. J Pak Med Assoc, 1998; 48(4): 114-16
26. Lefevre G, Girardot-Dubois S, Chevallier G et al: Evaluation of the quality of blood glucose meters using the HemoCue B glucose system. Diabetes Metab, 1999; 25(4): 350-55
27. Randwick C, de Blieck S, Colagiuri R: Evaluation of a new visual reagent blood glucose test strip, Prince of Wales hospital (NDP_BetaChek instructions)
28. Landis JR, Miller ME, Davis CS, Koch GG: Some general methods for the analysis of categorical data in longitudinal studies. Stat Med, 1988; 7: 109-37
29. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986; 1: 307-10
30. Poirier JY, Le Prieur N, Campion L et al: Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters. Diabetes Care, 1998; 21: 1919-24
31. Chmielewski SA: Advances and strategies for glucose monitoring. Am J Clin Pathol, 1995; 104(Suppl.1): S59-S71
32. Smith EA, Kilpatrick ES: Intra-operative blood glucose measurements: the effect of haematocrit on glucose test strips. Anaesthesia, 1994; 49: 129-32
33. Jain R, Myers TF, Kahn SE, Zeller WP: How accurate is glucose analysis in the presence of multiple interfering substances in the neonate? (glucose analysis and interfering substances). J Clin Lab Anal, 1996; 10: 13-16