Upright posture impact on spine susceptability in scoliosis and progression patterns of scoliotic curve

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 48-52

  Xiao, Jun ^a   Wu, Zhi Hong ^a   Qiu, Gui Xing ^a   Yang, Xin Yu ^a   Li, Jia Yi ^a   Weng, Xi Sheng ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

Model, animal; Muridae; Scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; LORDOSIS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOGENESIS; RAT; RAT STRAIN; RIB FRACTURE; SCOLIOSIS; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STANDING; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TETHERED CORD SYNDROME;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; FEMALE; POSTURE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33947172422     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stehbens WE. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis revisited. Exp Mol Pathol,2003,74:49-60.
2. Mente PL, Stokes IA, Spence H, et al. Progression of vertebral wedging in an asymmetrically loaded rat tail model. Spine,1997, 22:1292-1296.
3. Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD, et al. Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth. Implications for scoliosis progression. Spine,1996,21:1162-1167.
4. Machida M, Murai I, Miyashita Y, et al. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Experimental study in rats. Spine, 1999,24: 1985-1989.
5. Reuben JD, Brown RH, Nash CL Jr, et al. In vivo effects of axial loading on double-curve scoliotic spines. Spine, 1982,7:440-447.
6. Chinese source.
7. Chinese source.
8. Sarwark JF, Dabney KW, Salzman SK, et al. Experimental scoliosis in the rat: I. methodology, anatomic features and neurologic characterization. Spine,1988,13:466-471.
9. Hueter V. Anatomische studien an den extremitaetengelenken neugeborener und erwachsener. Virkows Archiv Path Anat Physiol,1862,25:572-599.
10. Qiu G, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis: a Peking Union Medical College method. Spine, 2005,30:1419-1426.
11. Goff CW, Hartford, Landmesser W, et al. Bipedal rats and mice. J Bone and Joint Surg,1957,39:616-621.
12. Braun JT, Ogilvie JW, Akyuz E, et al. Experimental scoliosis in an immature goat model: a method that creates idiopathic-type deformity with minimal violation of the spinal elements along the curve. Spine,2003,28:2198-2203.
13. Coillard C, Rhalmi S, Rivard CH. Experimental scoliosis in the minipig: study of vertebral deformations. Ann Chir, 1999,53:773-780.
14. Pal GP, Bhatt RH, Patel VS. Mechanism of production of experimental scoliosis in rabbits. Spine,1991,16:137-142.
15. Barrios C, Arrotegui JI. Experimental kyphoscoliosis induced in rats by selective brain stem damage. Int Orthop, 1992, 16:146-151.
16. Chinese source.
17. El Fegoun AB, Schwab F, Gamez L, et al. Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis. Spine, 2005, 30: 1535-1540
18. Stokes IA. Analysis of symmetry of vertebral body loading consequent to lateral spinal curvature. Spine, 1997, 22: 2495-2503.
19. Ylikoski M. Growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Pediatr Orthop B,2005,14:320-324.
20. Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M. Effect of growth velocity on the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2006,15:311-315.
21. Cheung J, Veldhuizen AG, Halberts JP, et al. Geometric and electromyographic assessments in the evaluation of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 2006,31:322-329.
22. Bagnall KM, Beuerlein M, Johnson P, et al. Pineal transplantation after pinealectomy in young chickens has no effect on the development of scoliosis. Spine, 2001,26:1022-1027.
23. Hawes MC, O'brien JP. The transformation of spinal curvature into spinal deformity: pathological processes and implications for treatment. Scoliosis, 2006,1:1-9.