Primary total knee arthroplasty performed with a minimally invasive surgery subvastus approach

Techniques in Knee Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 60-67

  Bal, B Sonny ^a   Greenberg, David D ^a   Lowe, Jason ^a   Aleto, Thomas J ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Outcomes; Primary TKA; Subvastus approach

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATELLA FRACTURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 33947156652     PISSN: 15360636     EISSN: 15381935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/btk.0b013e3180326f6e     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abdel-Salam A, Eyres KS. Effects of tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:250-253.
2. Argenson J-NA, Flecher X. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2004;11:341-347.
3. Berger RA, Sanders S, Gerlinger T, et al. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:33-38.
4. Bindelglass DF, Vince KG. Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Implication for surgical technique. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:507-511.
5. Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, et al. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:82-87.
6. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:A26-A32.
7. Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics. 2003;26:899-903.
8. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740-747.
9. Chang C-H, Chen K-H, Yang R-S, et al. Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;398:189-195.
10. Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M, et al. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:65-68.
11. Coon TM, Tria AJ Jr, Lavernia C, et al. The economics of minimally invasive total knee surgery. Sem Arthroplasty. 2005;16:235-238.
12. Cushner FD. The subvastus approach to the knee. J Knee Surg. 2003;16:52-54.
13. Faure BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B, et al. Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:511-516.
14. Goble EM, Justin DF. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:235-245.
15. Gore DR, Sellinger DS, Gassner KJ, et al. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:33-35.
16. Hanssen A, Lewallen D, Pagnano M, et al. Minimally invasive TKA with an optimized subvastus approach: a consecutive series of 103 patients. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; Washington, DC, Feb. 23-27, 2005.
17. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;269:70-77.
18. Husted H, Toftgaard Jensen T. Influence of the pneumatic tourniquet on patella tracking in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study in 100 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:694-697.
19. Katsumata S, Nagashima M, Kato K, et al. Changes in coagulation- fibrinolysis marker and neutrophil elastase following the use of tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty and the influence of neutrophil elastase on thromboembolism. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:510-516.
20. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:54-59.
21. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee replacement using a mini-mid vastus incision technique and results. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:231-238.
22. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:161-168.
23. Meek RMD, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35: 191-200.
24. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, et al. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1047-1053.
25. Palmer SH, Graham G. Tourniquet-induced rhabdomyolysis after total knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:416-417.
26. Panel NIHC. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8Y10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1328-1335.
27. Roysam GS, Oakley MJ. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:454-457.
28. Stulberg SD. Minimally invasive navigated knee surgery: an American perspective. Orthopedics. 2005;28(10 suppl):s1241-s1246.
29. Tamvakopoulos GS, Toms AP, Glasgow M. Subcutaneous thigh fat necrosis as a result of tourniquet control during total knee arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:396.
30. Tenholder M, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR. Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:67-76.
31. Tria Jr AJ, Coon TM. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:185-190.
32. Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, et al. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:978-982.
33. Weinhardt C, Barisic M, Bergmann EG, et al. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:401-403.