Nomenclature of cultivated plants: A historical botanical standpoint

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 634, Issue , 2004, Pages 29-36

  McNeill, J ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Botanical nomenclature; Culton; ICBN; ICNCP; Taxon; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947154429     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.634.2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Arthur J.C., Barnhart, J.H., Britton, N.L., Clements, F., Cook, O.F., Coville, F.V., Earle, F.S., Evans, A.W., Hazen, T.E., Hoolick, A., Howe, M.A., Knowlton, F.H., Moore, G.T., Rusby, H.H., Shear, C.L., Underwood, L.M., White, D. and Wight, W.F. (Nomenclature Commission). 1907. American Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 34:167-178.
2. Ascherson, P.F.A. and Graebner, K.O.R.P.P. 1896-1938. Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora. Leipzig. 15 vols. (incompl.).
3. Berlin, B., Breedlove, D.E. and Raven, P.H. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Amer. Anthropol. 75:214-242.
4. Briquet, J. 1906. Règles internationales de la nomenclature botanique adoptées par le Congrès International de Botanique de Vienne 1905. Jena.
5. Briquet, J. 1912. Règles internationales de la nomenclature botanique. Deuxième édition mise au point d'après les décisions du Congrès International de Botanique de Bruxelles 1910. Jena.
6. Briquet, J. 1931. Compte rendu des débats de la sous-section de nomenclature. p.554-654. In: F.T. Brooks and T.F. Chip (eds.), Report of the Proceedings, 5th Intl. Bot. Congr. of Cambridge, 16-23 August 1930, University Press, Cambridge.
7. Briquet, J. 1935. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature. Revised by the Intl. Bot. Congr. of Cambridge, 1930, Jena.
8. Camp, W.H., Rickett, H.W. and Weatherby, C.A. 1947. International rules of botanical nomenclature. Revised by the Intl. Congr. of Amsterdam, 1935. Brittonia 6:1-20.
9. Cantino, P.D. and De Queiroz, K. 2000. PhyloCode: a phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature. http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/
10. Chamberlain, D.F. 1982. Revision of Rhododendron. 2. Subgenus Hymenanthes. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 39:209-486.
11. Cullen, J. 1980. Revision of Rhododendron. 1. Subgenus Rhododendron sections Rhododendron and Pogonanthum. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 39:1-208.
12. Davis, P.H. and Heywood, V.H. 1963. Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Edinburgh.
13. de Candolle, A. 1868. Laws of botanical nomenclature, adopted by the International Botanical Congress held at Paris in August 1867, together with an historical introduction and a commentary. Translated from the French by H.A. Weddell. London.
14. Duggar, B.M. 1929. Proceedings of the International Congress for Plant Sciences, Ithaca, New York, August 16-23, 1926, Wisconsin. 2 vols.
15. Farjon 2002. A new genus and species in Cupressaceae (Coniferales) from north Vietnam, Xanthocyparis vietnamensis. Novon 12:179-189.
16. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 1993. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Volume 1. Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford. xxi + 372p.
17. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T.S., Nicolson, D.H., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Trehane, P., Turland, N.J. and Hawksworth, D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Regnum Veg. 138.
18. Helm, J. 1957. Versuch einer morphologisch-systematischen Gliederung der Art Beta vulgaris L. Züchter 27(5):203-222.
19. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1953. New concepts in flowering-plant taxonomy. London.
20. Hetterscheid, W.L.A. and van der Berg, R.G. 1996. Cultonomy of Aster. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45:173-181.
21. Hetterscheid, W.L.A., van der Berg, R.G. and Brandenburg, W.A. 1996. An annotated history of the principles of cultivated plant classification. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45:123-134.
22. Huxley, J.S. 1940. The new systematics. Oxford.
23. Kress, W.J. 2002. A sillier enterprise is hard to imagine. Plant Press 5(3):3,5.
24. Lange, W., Brandenburg, W.A. and De Bock, T.S.M. 1999. Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 130:81-96.
25. Lanjouw, J., Baehni, Ch., Merrill, E.D., Rickett, H.W., Robyns, W., Sprague, J.A. and Stafleu, F.A. 1950. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Seventh International Botanical Congress. Stockholm, July 1950. Regnum Veg. 3.
26. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum. 2 vols. Holmiae [Stockholm].
27. McNeill, J. 1976. The taxonomy and evolution of weeds. Weed Res. 16:399-413.
28. McNeill, J. 1982. Problems of weed taxonomy. p.35-45. In: W. Holzner and N. Numata (eds.), Biology and ecology of weeds, W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands. (Geobotany 2).
29. McNeill, J. 1998. Culton: a useful term, questionably argued. Hortax News 1(4):15-22. http://www.hortax.org.uk/hortaxnews/text4.html#sect9
30. Mansfeld, R. 1959. Vorläufiges Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlich oder gärtnerisch kultivierter Pflanzenarten. Berlin. (Die Kulturpflanze Beih. 2).
31. Mansfeld, R. 1986. Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlicher und gärtnerischer Kulturpflanze. Berlin.
32. Nicolson, D.H. 1991. A history of botanical nomenclature. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78:33-56.
33. Pickersgill, B., Heiser, C.B. and McNeill, J. 1979. Numerical taxonomic studies on variation and domestication in some species of Capsicum. p.679-700. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding (eds.), The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London and New York. (Linn. Soc. Symp. 7).
34. Ride, W.D.L., Cogger, H.G., Dupuis, C., Kraus, O., Minelli, A., Thompson, F.C. and Tubbs, P.K. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. ed. 4. London.
35. Sprague, T.A. 1950. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature Supplement embodying the alterations made at the Sixth International Botanical Congress, Amsterdam, 1935. p.65-87. In: J. Lanjouw (ed.), Botanical nomenclature and taxonomy, a symposium organized by the International Union of Biological Sciences with support of UNESCO at Utrecht, the Netherlands, June 14-19, 1948. Chron. Bot. 12.
36. Stearn, W.T. 1952. Proposed International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 77:157-173.
37. Stearn, W.T. 1953. International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants. London.
38. Trehane, P. 2004. 50 years of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants: Future prospects for the Code. Acta Hort. 634:17-27.
39. Trehane, P., Brickell, C.D., Baum, B.R., Hetterscheid, W.L.A., Leslie, A.C., McNeill, J., Spongberg, S.A. and Vrugtman, F. 1995. The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants -1995. (ICNCP or Cultivated Plant Code), adopted by the Intl.
40. Commission for the Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants, Quarterjack Publishing, Wimborne, U.K. (Regnum Veg. 133).
41. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., and Webb, D.A. 1964-1980. Flora Europaea. 5 vols. Cambridge.
42. van der Berg, R.G. 1999. Cultivar-group classification. p.135-143. In: S. Andrews, A.C. Leslie and C. Alexander (eds.), Taxonomy of cultivated plants, 3rd Intl. Symposium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
43. van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. and van der Maesen, L.J.G. 1996. Crop-weed complexes: the complex relationship between crop plants and their wild relatives. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45:135-155.