Validation of a high-resolution, phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequence for evaluation of flow in coronary artery bypass grafts

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 557-563

  Salm, Liesbeth P ^a,b   Schuijf, Joanne D ^a,b   Lamb, Hildo J ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a   Vliegen, Hubert W ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Van Der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b   De Roos, Albert ^a   Doornbos, Joost ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aorta; Flow Velocity; Left Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts; Phase Contrast Imaging; Vein Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BYPASS SURGERY; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS; VEIN GRAFT; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA, THORACIC; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 33947128609     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10976640601015243     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-2342.
2. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819-24.
3. Bedaux WL, Hofman MB, Vyt SL, et al. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve. JAmCollCardiol 2002;40;1848-1855.
4. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation 2003:107:1502-1508.
5. Debatin JF, Strong JA, Sostman HD, et al. MR characterization of blood flow in native and grafted internal mammary arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:443-50.
6. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Cruz BP, et al. MR flow measurement in the internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with graft stenosis at radiographic angiography. Radiology 2001;220:441-7.
7. Sakuma H, Globits S, O'Sullivan M, et al. Breath-hold MR measurements of blood flow velocity in internal mammary arteries and coronary artery bypass grafts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:219-22.
8. Frayne R, Holdsworth DW, Gowman LM, Computer-controlled flow simulator forMR flow studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:605-12.
9. Holdsworth DW, Rickey DW, Drangova M, et al. Computer-controlled positive displacement pump for physiological flow simulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1991;29:565-570.
10. Rebergen SA, Chin JG, Ottenkamp J, et al. Pulmonary regurgitation in the late postoperative follow-up of tetralogy of Fallot. Volumetric quantitation by nuclear magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993;88:2257-66.
11. Sakuma H, Kawada N, Kubo H, et al. Effect of breath holding on blood flow measurement using fast velocity encoded cine MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:346-348.
12. Wilson RF,Wyche K, Christensen BV, et al. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 1990;82:1595-606.
13. van der Geest RJ, Niezen RA, van der Wall EE, et al. Automated measurement of volume flow in the ascending aorta using MR velocity maps: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver variability in healthy volunteers. J Comput Assist Tomogr1998;22:904-911.
14. van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH. Quantification in cardiac MRI. J Magn Reson.Imaging 1999;10:602-608.
15. Salm LP, Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, et al. Blood flow in coronary artery bypass vein grafts: volume versus velocity at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:915-920.
16. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Vein graft function improvement after percutaneous intervention: evaluation with MR flow mapping. Radiology 2003;228:834-841.
17. GurneO, Chenu P, PolidoriC, et al. Functional evaluation of internal mammary artery bypass grafts in the early and late postoperative periods. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1120-8.
18. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651-671.
19. Boesiger P, Maier SE, Kecheng L, et al. Visualization and quantification of the human blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 1992;25:55-67.
20. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, et al. The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:230-241.
21. Hoogeveen, RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA, 1999, MR phase-contrast flow measurement with limited spatial resolution in small vessels: value of model-based image analysis: Magn Reson Med, v. 41, p. 520-8.
22. Meier D, Maier S, Boesiger P. Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Magn Reson Med 1988;8:25-34.
23. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial- volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:377-385.
24. van den Hout RJ, Lamb HJ, van den Aardweg JG, et al. Real-time MR imaging of aortic flow: influence of breathing on left ventricular stroke volume in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Radiology 2003;229:513-519.
25. Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Flow capacity of internal mammary artery grafts: early restriction and later improvement assessed by Doppler guide wire. Comparison with saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:640-7.
26. Stauder NI, Scheule AM, Hahn U, et al. Perioperativemonitoring of flow and patency in native and grafted internal mammary arteries using a combined MR protocol. Br J Radiol 2005;78:292-298.
27. Galjee MA, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study. Circulation 1996;93:660-6.
28. Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:845-8.