Regional modeling using one-atmospheric models to regional haze, 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 air quality

Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association's Annual Conference and Exhibition, AWMA

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 501-512

  Morris, Ralph E ^a   Yarwood, Greg ^a   Emery, Christopher A ^a   Wilson, Gary ^a   Koo, Bonyoung ^a  

^a ENVIRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

CAMx; CMAQ; Nitrate; Ozone; PM; Sulfate; Visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947115442     PISSN: 10526102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Byun, D.W., and Ching, J.K.S. Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. (EPA/600/R-99/030) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 1999.
2. ENVIRON. User's Guide Comprehensive Air Quality Model With Extensions (CAMx) Version 4.20. ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, California (available at www.camx.com). 2005.
3. Gery, M. W., G. Z. Whitten, J. P. Killus, and M. C. Dodge. A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. J. Geophysical Research, 1989 94, 12,925-12,956.
4. Walcek, C.J. and Taylor, G.R. A Theoretical Method For Computing Vertical Distributions Of Acidity And Sulfate Production Within Cumulus Clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 1986. 43 339-355.
5. Nenes, A., Pilinis, C., Pandis, S. N. ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols. Aquatic Geochemistry, 1998. Vol. 4, pp. 123-152.
6. Jeffries H. and S. Tonnesen. Comparison of Two Photochemical Reaction Mechanisms using Mass Balance and Process Analysis. Atmos. Env. 1994 Vol. 28, No. 18, pp2991-3003.
7. Dunker, A.M., G. Yarwood, J. Ortmann, and G.M. Wilson. 2002b. The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model - Implementation, accuracy and efficiency. Environ. Sci. and Tech., 36, 2965-2976.
8. Dunker, A. M. 1980. The response of an atmospheric reaction-transport model to changes in input functions, Atmos. Environ., 14, 671-679.
9. Dunker, A.M. 1981: Efficient calculations of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models, Atmos. Environ. 15, 1155-1161.
10. Dunker, A.M., G. Yarwood, J. Ortmann, and G.M. Wilson. 2002b. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model. Environ. Sci. and Tech., 36, 2953-2964.
11. Yang Y.J., J.W. Wilkinson and A.G. Russell. 1997. "Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models." Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 2859-2868.
12. Hakami A., M.T. Odman and A.G. Russell. 2003. "High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models." Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(11): 2442-2452.
13. Odman, M. T., J.W. Boylan, J.G. Wilkinson, A.G. Russell, K. Doty, W. Norris, R. McNider, S.F. Mueller, and R.E. Imhoff. 2002. "SAMI Air Quality Modeling Report." Final report to the Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative, Asheville, NC.
14. Morris, R.E., E. Tai, G. Wilson, and D. Weiss. "Use of Advanced Ozone Source Apportionment Techniques to Estimate Area of Influence (AOI) of Emissions Contributions to Elevated Ozone Concentrations" presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, San Diego, CA. June 14-18, 1998.
15. Morris, R.E. and E. Tai, C. Hersey, C. Fitzner, M. Rodenberg and M. Lebeis, L. Pocalujka, and G. Wolff. "A Methodology for Quantifying Ozone Transport and Assessing the Benefits of Alternative Control Strategies" presented at the AWMA Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Orlando, FL. June 2001.
16. x SIP Call." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, September 23. 1998.
17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Technical Support Document for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule: Air Quality Modeling Analysis", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 277711. March. 2005.
18. th NATO Conference, Banff Centre, Canada. October. 2004.
19. Tonnesen, G., Z. Wang, M. Omary, C-J. Chien, Y. Wang, R. Morris, S. Kemball-Cook, Y. Jia, S. Lau, B. Koo, Z. Adelman, A. Holland and J. Wallace. Final Report for the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) 2002 Visibility Model Performance Evaluation. (http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/reports/final/2002_MPE_report_main_ body_fnl_dft_for_MF_reviews.pdf). January 23, 2006.
20. Morris, R., G. Mansell, B. Koo, A. Hoats, G. Tonnesen, M. Omary, C-J. Chien, Y. Wang. CENRAP Modeling Update: CMAQ versus CAMx Model Performance Evaluation. (http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/cenrap/ppt_files/Morris_MPE_Feb6-82006.ppt). February 7, 2006.
21. Morris, R., G. Mansell, B. Koo, A. Hoats, G. Tonnesen, M. Omary, C-J. Chien, Y. Wang. CENRAP Modeling: Need for 36 km versus 12 km Grid Resolution. (http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/cenrap/ppt_files/Morris_36vs12km_Feb6-8_2006.ppt). February 7, 2006
22. Morris, R.E., B. Koo, A. Guenther, G. Yarwood, D. McNally, T. Tesche, G. Tonnesen, J. Boylan and P. Brewer. 2006. Model Sensitivity Evaluation for Organic Carbon Using Two Multi-pollutant Air Quality Models that Simulate Haze in the Southeastern United States. Accepted in Atmos. Env. 2006.
23. Baker, K. 2005. "PM2.5 Model Performance Base J". Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium/Midwest regional Planning Organization, Des Plaines, Illinois (http://www.ladco.org/tech/photo/present/baseJ_MPE_PM_2.pdf). September.
24. Tesche, T.W., R.E. Morris, G.S. Tonnesen, D.E. McNally, P. Brewer and J. Boylan. 2005. CMAQ/CAMx Annual 2002 Performance Evaluation over the Eastern United States. Accepted in Atmos. Env. 2006.