Anatomical investigations and their ethical dilemmas

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 338-343

  Jones, D Gareth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Blastocyst; Cadaver; Embryo; Human dignity; Plastination

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; BLASTOCYST; CADAVER; EMBRYO RESEARCH; ETHICS; EXPECTATION; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; HUMAN DIGNITY; INFORMED CONSENT; PLASTINATION; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; DISSECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL ETHICS; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

ANATOMY; ANATOMY, ARTISTIC; CADAVER; EMBRYO RESEARCH; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PLASTIC EMBEDDING;

EID: 33947106399     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: 10982353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20435     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. 2001. Learning from Bristol: The report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Norwich: The Stationary Office.
2. Hildebrandt S. 2006. How the Pernkopf controversy facilitated a historical and ethical analysis of the anatomical sciences in Austria and Germany: A recommendation for the continued use of the Pernkopf atlas. Clin Anat 19:91-100.
3. Israel HA, Seidelman WE. 1996. Nazi origins of an anatomy text: The Pernkopf atlas. JAMA 276:1633.
4. Jones DG. 2000. Speaking for the Dead: Cadavers in Biology and Medicine. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
5. Jones DG. 2002. Re-inventing anatomy: The impact of plastination on how we see the human body. Clin Anat 15:436-440.
6. Jones DG. 2005. Responses to the human embryo and embryonic stem cells: Scientific and theological assessments. Sci Christ Belief 17:199-221.
7. Jones DG, Telfer B. 1995, Before I was an embryo, I was a pre-embryo: Or was I? Bioethics 9:32-49.
8. Polkinghorne J. 1989. Review of the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material. London: HMSO.
9. Pross C. 1992. Nazi doctors, German medicine, and historical truth. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, eds. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremburg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p 32-52.
10. Riggs G. 1998. What should we do about Eduard Pernkopfs atlas? Acad Med 73:380-386.
11. Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry. 2001. The royal Liverpool children's inquiry report. London: The Stationary Office.
12. Sawday J. 1995. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge.
13. Towns CR, Jones DG. 2004. Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: A context for both science and ethics. J Med Ethics 30: 410-413.
14. von Hagens G. 2000. Anatomy Art: Fascination Beneath the Surface. Heidelberg, Germany: Institute for Plastination.
15. von Hagens G, Tiedemann K, Kriz W. 1987. The current potential of plastination. Anat Embryol 175:411-421.
16. Walker B. 2001. Inquiry into the matters arising form the post-mortem and anatomical investigation practices of the Institute of Forensic Medicine. Sydney: Government of the State of New South Wales.
17. Warnock M. 1984. Report of the committee of enquiry into human fertilisation and embryology. London: HMSO.
18. Weitzman M. 1990. The ethics of using Nazi medical data: A Jewish perspective. Second Opin 14:27-38.
19. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813.