Brain-Computer music interface for composition and performance

International Journal on Disability and Human Development

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 119-126

  Mirrander, Eduardo Reck ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assistive music technology; bio signal music controller; brain computer interface; generative music systems; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MACHINE LEARNING; MUSIC; POTENTIOMETRY;

EID: 33947103076     PISSN: 21911231     EISSN: 21910367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IJDHD.2006.5.2.119     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berger H. Über Das Elektrenkephalogramm Des Menschen. Arch Psychiatrie Nervenkrankheiten 1929; 87:527-70. [German]
2. Vidal JJ. Toward direct brain-computer communication. Ann Rev Biophysics Bioengineering 1973:2: 157-80.
3. Wolpaw J, McFarland D, Neat G, Forneris C. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991:78 (3): 252-9.
4. Guger C, Pfurtscheller G. EEG based brain-computer interface (BCI) running in real-time under Windows. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106 (1): 91-100.
5. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 2004; 51.
6. Adrian ED, Matthews BHC. The Berger rhythm: Potential changes from the occipital lopes in man. Brain 1934; 57:355-85.
7. Teitelbaum R. In tune: Some early experiments in biofeedback music (1966-1974). In: Rosenboom D, ed. Biofeedback and the arts. Results of early experiments. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Aesthetic Res Center Can Publ, 1975.
8. Lucier A. Statement on: Music for solo performer. In: Rosenboom D, ed. Biofeedback and the arts. Results of early experiments. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Aesthetic Res Center Can Publ, 1975.
9. Rosenboom R, ed. Biofeedback and the arts. Results of early experiments. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Aesthetic Res Center Can Publ, 1975.
10. Rosenboom D. The performing brain. Comp Mus J 1990; 14 (1 ):48-65.
11. Miranda ER, Sharman K, Kilborn K, Duncan A. On harnessing the electroencephalogram for the musical braincap. Comp Mus J 2003; 27 (2):80-l 02.
12. Peretz I, Zatorre RJ. The cognitive neuroscience of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ Press, 2003.
13. Miranda ER, Roberts S, Stokes M. On generating EEG for controlling musical systems. Biomed Technik 2004; 49 (I ):75-6. [German].
14. Giannitrapani D. The electrophysiology of intellectual functions. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1985.
15. Misulis KE. Essentials of clinical neurophysiology. Boston, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
16. Hjorth B. EEG analysis based on time series properties. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 29:306-10.
17. Cope D. Virtual music. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2001.
18. Birbaumer N, Ghanayin N, Hinterberger, Iversen 1, Kotchoubey B, Kubler A, Perelmeouter J, Taub E, Flor H. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 1999; 398:297-8.
19. Anderson C, Sijercic Z. Classification of EEG signals from four subjects during five mental tasks. Solving Engineering Problems with Neural Networks. Conf Engineering Applicat Neural Networks (EANN' 96), London, UK, 1996.
20. Petsche H, Etlinger SC. EEG and thinking. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Acad Sci, 1998.
21. Assayag G, Dubnov S. Using factor oracles for machine improvisation. Soft Computing 2004; 8 (9): 604-10.