Improving prediction of hydrophobic segments along a transmembrane protein sequence using adaptive multiscale lifting

Multiscale Modeling and Simulation

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 116-129

  Knight, Marina I ^a   Nason, Guy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive lifting; Distance matrix; Wavelets

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

DISTANCE MATRIX; HYDROPHOBIC SEGMENTS; HYDROPHOBICITY INDEX; TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN; WAVELET MULTISCALE METHODS;

PROTEINS;

EID: 33847756723     PISSN: 15403459     EISSN: 15403467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/050623863     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Ser. in Appl. Math. 61, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.
2. A. Cohen, I. Daubechies, and P. Vial, Wavelets on the interval and fast wavelet transforms, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 1 (1993), pp. 54-81.
3. D. M. Engelman, T. A. Steitz, and A. Coldman, Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., 15 (1986), pp. 321-353.
4. P. Fisher, G. Baudoux, and J. Wouters, WAVPRED: A wavelet-based algorithm for the prediction of transmembrane proteins, Commun. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), pp. 44-56.
5. H. Hirakawa, S. Muta, and S. Kuhara, The hydrophobic cores of proteins predicted by wavelet analysis, Bioinformatics, 15 (1999), pp. 141-148.
6. M. Jansen, G. P. Nason, and B. W. Silverman, Scattered data smoothing by empirical Bayesian shrinkage of second generation wavelet coefficients, in Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing, Proc. SPIE 4478, A. Laine, M. Unser, and A. Aldroubi, eds., SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2001, pp. 87-97.
7. M. Jansen, G. P. Nason, and B. W. Silverman, Multivariate Nonparametric Regression using Lifting, Technical report 04:17, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2004, submitted.
8. I. M. Johnstone and B. W. Silverman, Empirical Bayes selection of wavelet thresholds, Ann. Statist., 33 (2005), pp. 1700-1752.
9. I. M. Johnstone and B. W. Silverman, EbayesThresh: R Programs for Empirical Bayes Thresholding, J. Statist. Software, 12 (2005), pp. 1-38.
10. J. Kyte and R. F. Doolittle, A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein, J. Mol. Biol., 157 (1982), pp. 105-132.
11. P. Lio and M. Vannucci, Wavelet change-point prediction of transmembrane proteins, Bioinformatics, 16 (2000), pp. 376-382.
12. M. A. Nunes, M. I. Knight, and G. P. Nason, Adaptive Lifting for Nonparametric Regression, Technical report 04:20, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, Stat. Comput., (2006), to appear.
13. B. Rost, R. Casadio, P. Fariselli, and C. Sander, Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy, Protein Science, 4 (1995), pp. 521-533.
14. B. Rost, P. Fariselli, and R. Casadio, Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy, Protein Science, 5 (1996), pp. 1704-1718.
15. B. Rost and C. Sander, Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy, J. Mol. Biol., 232 (1993), pp. 584-599.
16. W. Sweldens, The lifting scheme: A construction of second generation wavelets, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 29 (1998), pp. 511-546.
17. A. Zemla, C. Venclovas, K. Fidelis, and B. Rost, A modified definition of Sov, a segment based measure for protein secondary structure assesment, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 34 (1999), pp. 220-223.