The role of knowledge creation in adopting extreme programming model: An empirical study

ITI 3rd International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, ICICT 2005 - Enabling Technologies for the New Knowledge Society

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 75-87

  Bahli, Bouchaib ^a   Zeid, El Saved Abou ^a  

^a John Molson School of Business   (Canada)

Author keywords

Extreme programming; Knowledge creation; Systems adoption

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EXTREME PROGRAMMING; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; SYSTEMS ADOPTION; WATERFALL LIFE CYCLE MODELS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33847753137     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITICT.2005.1609616     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon, USA.
2. th International Conference on Software Engineering, Kyoto, Japan.
3. M. Aoyama (1998). Web-based agile software development, IEEE Software, 56-65.
4. Barki, Henri, Suzanne Rivard, Jean Talbot. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (4), 37-69.
5. K. Beck (1999). Embracing change with extreme programming. IEEE Computer, 32, 10, 70-77.
6. B. Boehm. (2002). Get ready for agile methods, with care. IEEE Computer, 64-69.
7. P. Chau and P. J. Hu. (2002). Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 191-229.
8. rd ed. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.
9. G. Cogola and C. Gnezzi (1998). Sofwatre processes: a retrospective and a path to the future. Software ProcessImprovement and Practice. 4, 101-123.
10. M. A. Cusumano and R. W. Selby (1997). How Microsoft builds software. Communications of the ACM, 40 (6), 53-61.
11. D. F. Davis, (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-339.
12. D. F. Davis, P. R. Bagozzi, and R. P. Warshaw. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.
13. P. Feher (2002). The missing link in the integration of knowledge management practices and technological solutions. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland, 939-950.
14. B. Fitzgerald (2002). Systems Development Methodologies: The Problem of Tenses, Information Technology & People. 13 (3), 174-183.
15. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA.
16. J. S. Gabig (1991). Managing software development: an insight into the process. National Contract Management Journal, 21 (2), 41-51.
17. G. Glaser and L. Straus (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Aldine publishing company, New York.
18. H. T. Greer, and B. M. Murtaza, (2003). Web Personalization: The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on the Intention To Use Personalization. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50-66.
19. J. Guinan, et al. (1998). Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioural versus technical approach. Information Systems Research, 9 (2), 101-125;
20. J. Highsmith (2002). Agile software development ecosystems, Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
21. J. Iivari, R. Hirschheim and K. H. Klein (2001). A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (3), 179-218.
22. A. Jeffries et al. (2001). Extreme programming installed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
23. T. Kahkonen, and P. Abrahamsson, (2003). Digging into the fundamentals of Extremem programming, in. Proceedings of the 29th EUROMICRO Conference. Antalya, Turkey, 1-8.
24. E. Karahanna, D. Straub, and N. Chervany. (1999). Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison Of Pre-Adoption and post-Adoption Beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 83-213.
25. R. E. Kraut and L.A. Streeter (1995). Coordination in software development Communications of the ACM, 38 (3), 69-82.
26. M. Laitinen, M. E. Fayad and R.P. Ward (2000). The problem with scalability. Communications of the ACM, 43 (9), 105-107.
27. M. Lindvall et al. (2002). Empirical Findings in Agile Methods. In Proceeding of Extreme Programming and Agile Method: XP/Agile Universe, Chicago, IL, 197-207.
28. Y. Malhotra, and D. Galletta, (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
29. C. Martin, (2000). Extreme programming development through dialog. IEEE Software, 17 (4), 12-13.
30. K. Mathieson, (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 173-191.
31. F. Maurer and S. Martel (2002). Extreme Programming: Rapid Development for Web-Based applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 86-90.
32. I. Nonaka and R. Toyama (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1, 2-10.
33. W. Orlikowski (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 3, 309-340.
34. W. W. Royce (1970). Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques, Proceedings of IEEE WESTCON, Los Angeles, CA.
35. T. Ravichandran and A. Rai (2000). Total Quality Management in Information Systems development: Key Constructs and Relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16 (3), 119-155.
36. J. Rasmusson (2003). Introducing XP into Greenfield projects: Lessons learned. IEEE Software, 21-28.
37. S. Sircar, S. Nerur and R. Mahapatra (2001). Revolution or evolution? A comparison of object-oriented and structured systems development methods. MIS Quarterly, 25 (4), 457-471.
38. I. Sommerville (1996). Software process models. ACM Computing Surveys, 28 (1), 269-271.
39. R. Tesch (1990). Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools, Falmer Press, New York.
40. I. Tuomi (1999). Corporate knowledge: Theory and Practice of intelligent organizations. Helsinki: Metaxis.
41. A. Van Deursen, (2001). Customer involvement in Extreme Programming: XP2001 Workshop Report, ACM Software Engineering Notes, 70-73.
42. V. Venkatesh and D. F. Davis. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204.
43. V. Venkatech, et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (4), 425-478.
44. P. Wendorff (2002). Systems thinking in extreme programming. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland. 203-207.
45. L. Williams and A. Cockburn (2003). Agile Software development: it's about feedback and change. IEEE Computer, 39-43.
46. E. Yourdon (1997), Death march, Prentice Hall, N. J.