Different modes of resource variation provide a critical test of ideal free distribution models

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 877-886

  Flaxman, Samuel M ^a,c   DeRoos, Christina A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical test; Game theory model; Habitat selection; Ideal free distribution; Interference

Indexed keywords

APHID; CONSUMER-RESOURCE INTERACTION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GAME THEORY; HABITAT SELECTION; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; LEGUME; PATCHINESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

ACYRTHOSIPHON PISUM; APHIDIDAE; PISUM SATIVUM; VICIA FABA;

EID: 33847729933     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0316-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alonzo SH (2002) State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioural interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evol Ecol Res 4:759-778
2. Bernstein C, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1988) Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. J Anim Ecol 57:1007-1026
3. Bernstein C, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1991) Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. 2. The influence of travel costs and structure of the environment. J Anim Ecol 60:205-225
4. Campbell A, Mackauer M (1975) Thermal constants for development of the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and some of its parasites. Can Entomol 107:419-423
5. Cosner C (2005) A dynamic model for the ideal-free distribution as a partial differential equation. Theor Popul Biol 67:101-108
6. Cressman R, Køivan V, Garay J (2004) Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. Am Nat 164:473-489
7. Cresswell W, Smith RD, Ruxton GD (2001) Absolute foraging rate and susceptibility to interference competition in blackbirds varies with patch conditions. J Anim Ecol 70:228-236
8. Dolman PM (1995) The intensity of interference varies with resource density: evidence from a field study with snow buntings, Plectrophenax nivalis. Oecologia 102:511-514
9. Dolman PM, Sutherland WJ (1997) Spatial patterns of depletion imposed by foraging vertebrates: theory, review and metaanalysis. J Anim Ecol 66:481-494
10. Douglas AE (2003) The nutritional physiology of aphids. Adv Insect Physiol 31:73-140
11. Earn DJD, Johnstone RA (1997) A systematic error in tests of ideal free theory. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 264:1671-1675
12. Flaxman SM (2006) Ideal free distribution models of habitat selection behavior: review, synthesis, and empirical tests. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
13. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16-36
14. Grand TC (2002) Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging-predationrisk trade-offs. Behav Ecol 13:280-290
15. Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) Predation risk, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution. Evol Ecol Res 1:389-409
16. Gray RD, Kennedy M (1994) Misconceptions or misreadings? Missing the real issues about the IFD. Oikos 71:167-170
17. Hale BK, Bale JS, Pritchard J, Masters GJ, Brown VK (2003) Effects of host plant drought stress on the performance of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.): a mechanistic analysis. Ecol Entomol 28:666-677
18. Hassell MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223:1133-1136
19. Holmgren N (1995) The ideal free distribution of unequal competitors: predictions from a behaviour-based functional response. J Anim Ecol 64:197-212
20. Huberty AF, Denno RF (2004) Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85:1383-1398
21. Hugie DM, Grand TC (1998) Movement between patches, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution. Evol Ecol 12:1-19
22. Hugie DM, Grand TC (2003) Movement between habitats by unequal competitors: effects of finite population size on ideal free distributions. Evol Ecol Res 5:131-153
23. Humphries S, Ruxton GD, van der Meer J (2001) Unequal competitor ideal free distributions: predictions for differential effects of interference between habitats. J Anim Ecol 70:1062- 1069
24. Jackson AL, Humphries S, Ruxton GD (2004a) Resolving the departures of observed results from the ideal free distribution with simple random movements. J Anim Ecol 4:612-622
25. Jackson AL, Ranta E, Lundberg P, Kaitala V, Ruxton GD (2004b) Consumer-resource matching in a food chain when both predators and prey are free to move. Oikos 106:445-450
26. Jansson J, Ekbom B (2002) The effect of different plant nutrient regimes on the aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae growing on petunia. Entomol Exp Appl 104:109-116
27. Kennedy M, Gray RD (1993) Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos 68:158-166
28. Lessells CM (1995) Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models. Anim Behav 49:487-494
29. Losey JE, Denno RF (1998) Positive predator-predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79:2143-2152
30. Milinski M (1994) Ideal free theory predicts more than only input matching-a critique of Kennedy and Gray's review. Oikos 71:163-166
31. Moody AL, Ruxton GD (1996) The intensity of interference varies with food density: support for behaviour-based models of interference. Oecologia 108:446-449
32. Morris DW (2003) How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management? Wildlife Res 30: 303-319
33. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. Irwin, Chicago
34. Parker GA (1978) Searching for mates. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 214-244
35. Parker GA, Sutherland, WJ (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability - phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222-1242
36. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225
37. Ruxton GD, Moody AL (1997) The ideal free distribution with kleptoparasitism. J Theor Biol 186:449-458
38. Sih A (1998) Game theory and predator-prey response races. In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK (eds) Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 221-238
39. Sutherland WJ (1983) Aggregation and the "ideal free" distribution. J Anim Ecol 52:821-828
40. Sutherland WJ (1992) Game-theory models of functional and aggregative responses. Oecologia 90:150-152
41. Sutherland WJ, Allport GA (1994) A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management. J Anim Ecol 63:51-59
42. Sutherland WJ, Dolman PM (1994) Combining behaviour and population dynamics with applications for predicting consequences of habitat loss. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 255:133-138
43. Sutherland WJ, Parker GA (1985) Distribution of unequal competitors. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour: the 25th symposium of the British ecological society, Reading 1984. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 255-273
44. Sutherland WJ, Parker GA (1992) The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors. Anim Behav 44:345-355
45. Tregenza T (1995) Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv Ecol Res 26:253-307
46. Tregenza T, Parker GA, Thompson DJ (1996a) Interference and the ideal free distribution: models and tests. Behav Ecol 7: 379-386
47. Tregenza T, Parker GA, Thompson DJ (1996b) Interference and the ideal free distribution: oviposition in a parasitoid wasp. Behav Ecol 7:387-394
48. van der Meer J (1997) The ideal free distribution when predators differ in competitive abilities. Oikos 80:301-310
49. van der Meer J, Ens BJ (1997) Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators. J Anim Ecol 66:846-858