Imposing order: A process to manage day-to-day activities in two-earner families with preschool children

Journal of Family Nursing

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 56-82

  Hall, Wendy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dual earner; Grounded theory; Management strategies; Preschool children

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CHILD REARING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CHILD REARING; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; EMPLOYMENT; ENGLAND; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HOUSEKEEPING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PARENTS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33847723422     PISSN: 10748407     EISSN: 1552549X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1074840706297588     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Avard, D. (1999). All in a day's work. Families and Health, 6, 1-2.
2. Becker, P. E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995-1007.
3. Blismas, N. G., & Dainty, A.R.J. (2003). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Panacea or paradox? Building Research and Information, 31(6), 455-463.
4. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Burg, M. M., & Seeman, T. E. (1994). Families and health: The negative side of social ties. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 109-115.
6. Chesla, C. A. (1999). Becoming resilient: Skill development in couples living with non-insulin dependent diabetes. In H. I. McCubbin, E. A. Thompson, A. I. Thompson, & J. A. Futrell (Eds.), The dynamics of resilient families (pp. 99-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Clark, F. A. (2000). The concepts of habit and routine: A preliminary theoretical synthesis. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 123S-137S.
8. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family balance border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770.
9. Connell, R. W. (2005). A really good husband. Work/life balance, gender equity, and social change. American Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 369-383.
10. Daly, K. J. (1996). Families & time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Daly, K. J. (1999). Crisis of genealogy: Facing the challenges of infertility. In H. I. McCubbin, E. A. Thompson, A. I. Thompson, & J. A. Futrell (Eds.), The dynamics of resilient families (pp. 1-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Daly, K. (2003). Family theory versus the theories families live by. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 771-784.
13. Denham, S. A. (2003). Relationships between family rituals, family routines, and health. Journal of Family Nursing, 9(3), 305-330.
14. Doane, G. H., & Varcoe, C. (2005). Family nursing as relational inquiry: Developing health-promoting practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
15. Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381-390.
16. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: University of California.
17. Glaser, B. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
18. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
19. Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257-272.
20. Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2003). Balancing personal and family trajectories: An international study of dual-earner couples with pre-school children. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40, 401-412.
21. Hanson, S. M., & Boyd, S. (1996). Family nursing: An overview. In S. M. Hanson & S. T. Boyd (Eds.), Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 5-34). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
22. Hartrick, G. (1995). Part I: Transforming family nursing theory: From mechanicism to contextualism. Journal of Family Nursing, 1(2), 134-147.
23. Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43(2), 144-150.
24. Hochschild, A. R. (1996). The emotional geography of work and family life. In L. Morris & E. S. Lyon (Eds.), Gender relations in private and public: New research perspectives (pp. 13-32). London: Macmillan Press.
25. Howe, G. W. (2002). Integrating family routines and rituals with other family research paradigms: Comment on the special section. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 437-440.
26. Komter, A., & Vollebergh, W. (1997). Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 747-757.
27. Marks, S. R., & MacDermid, S. M. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 417-432.
28. Mayall, B. (1994). Negotiating health, children at home and primary school. London: Cassell.
29. McCubbin, H. L., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). Family transitions: Adaptation to stress. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family volume I: Coping with normative transitions (pp. 5-25). New York: Bruner/Mazel.
30. Mederer, H. J. (1999). Surviving the demise of a way of life: Stress and resilience in Northeastern commercial fishing families. In H. I. McCubbin, E. A. Thompson, A. I. Thompson, & J. A. Futrell (Eds.), The dynamics of resilient families (pp. 203-236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Olson, D. H. (1989). Circumplex Model of Family Systems VIII: Family assessment and intervention. In D. H. Olson & I. Sprenkle (Eds.), Circumplex Model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families (pp. 7-47). New York: Haworth Press.
32. Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Payne, C. C. (2004). Wives' domain-specific "marriage work" with friends and spouses: Links to marital quality. Family Relations, 53(4), 393-340.
33. Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304-310.
34. Sidebotham, P., & ALSPAC Study Team. (2001). Culture, stress, and the parent-child relationship: A qualitative study of parents' perceptions of parenting. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(6), 469-485.
35. Stanfield, J. B. (1998). Couples coping with dual careers: A description of flexible and rigid coping styles. Social Science Journal, 35(1), 53-64.
36. Vanier Institute of the Family. (2004). Profiling Canada's families III. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.
37. Voydanoff, P. (2002). Linkages between the work-family interface and work, family, and individual outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 138-164.
38. Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1993). Neglected methodological issues in employment stress. In B. C. Long & S. E. Kahn (Eds.), Women, work and coping (pp. 269-295). Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen's University Press.
39. Wright, L. M., & Leahey, M. (2000). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
40. Wright, L. M., & Leahey, M. (2005). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (4th ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.