Heterology: The shadows of a shade

Cladistics

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 84-89

  Williams, David M ^a   Ebach, Malte C ^b,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; HOMOLOGY; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 33847713406     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00135.x     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Agassiz, L., 1859. An Essay on Classification. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans & Roberts, London.
2. Amorin, D.S., 1992. An empirical system of ranking of biological classifications using biogeographic components. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 36, 281-292.
3. Butler, A.B., Saidel, W.M., 2000. Defining sameness: historical, biological, and generative homology. Bioessays, 22, 846-853.
4. Cain, A.J., 1984. Islands and evolution: theory and opinion in Darwin's earlier years. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 21, 5-27.
5. Collingwood, C., 1860a. On homomorphism; or, organic representative form. Proc. Literary Philos. Soc. Liverpool, 14, 181-216.
6. Collingwood, C., 1860b. On recurrent form, and its significance in systematic zoology. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Series 3 Part 6, 81-91.
7. Collingwood, C., 1861a. On Recurrent Form, and its Significance in Systematic Zoology. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Transactions of Sections, 114-115.
8. Collingwood, C., 1861b. On Agassiz' view of Darwin's theory of species. Proc. Literary Philos. Soc. Liverpool, 15, 81-99.
9. Cope, E.D., 1868. On the origin of genera. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 20, 242-300.
10. Croizat, L., 1971. Polytopisme ou monotopisme? Le cas de Viola parvula Tin. et de plusieurs autres plantes et animaux. Bol. Brot. Broteriana, 45, 379-431.
11. Dayrat, B., 2003. The roots of "Phylogeny": How did Haeckel really build his trees? Syst. Biol. 52, 515-527.
12. De Pinna, M.C.C., 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics, 7, 367-394.
13. Desmond, A., 1985. The making of institutional zoology in London, 1822-1836. Hist. Sci. 23, 223-250.
14. Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Legendre, F., Grandcolas, P., Robillard, T., Desutter-Grandcolas, J.-M., 2005. Convergence and parallelism: Is a new life ahead of old concepts? Cladistics, 21, 51-61.
15. Garcia-Moreno, J., Mindell, D.P., 2000. Rooting a phylogeny with homologous genes on opposite sex chromosomes (gametologs): a case study using Avian CHD. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1826-1832.
16. Gardiner, B.G., 1985. Editorial. Linnean, 1, 1-2.
17. Gardiner, B., 2001a. Editorial. The Linnean, 17, 1-3.
18. Gardiner, B., 2001b. William Swainson. The Linnean, 17, 5-14.
19. Haas, O., 1953. Homomorphy. Syst. Zool. 2, 143.
20. Haas, O., Simpson, G.G., 1946. Analysis of some phylogenetic terms, with attempts at redefinition. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 90, 319-349.
21. Haeckel, E.H.P.A., 1872. Die Kalkschwämme. Eine Monographie in Zwei Bänden Text und einem Atlas mit 60 Taflen Abbildungen. Georg Reimer, Berlin.
22. Haeckel, E.H.P.A., 1877. Studien Zur Gastraea-Theorie. Hermann Dufft, Jena.
23. Heads, M.J., 2005. The history and philosophy of panbiogeography. In: Llorente, J., Morrone, J.J. (Eds.). Regionalización Biogeográfica En Iberoamérica Y Tópicos Afines. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, pp. 67-123.
24. Heberer, G., Ed., 1968. Der gerechtfertigte Haeckel: Einblicke in seine Schriften aus Anlass des Erscheinens seines Hauptwerkes 'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen' vor 100 Jahren. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
25. Hermann, T., Kleisner, K., 2005. The five 'homes' of zoologist Mikhail M. Novikov (1876-1965). Analogy and adaptation in one's life and as a principle of biological investigation. Jahrb. Eur. Wissenschaftkultur, 1, 87-130.
26. Jenyns, L., 1835. Report on the recent progress and present state of zoology. Report of the 4th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 143-251.
27. Kluge, A.G., 2003. The repugnant and mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics, 19, 356-368.
28. Lankester, E.R., 1870. On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Series 4, 34-43.
29. MacLeay, W.S., 1819-21. Horæ Entomologicæ: or Essays on the Annulose Animals and C, 1. Part 1 & 2. Bagster, London.
30. McMillan, N., 2001. Cuthbert Collingwood (1826-1908). Linnean, 17, 9-20.
31. Mindell, D.P., Meyer, A., 2001. Homology evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 434-440.
32. Nelson, G.J., 1989. Cladistics and evolutionary models. Cladistics 5, 275-289.
33. Novikoff, M., 1935. Homomorphie, homologie und analogie. Anat. Anzeiger 80, 388-392.
34. Novikoff, M., 1936. L'homomorphie comme base méthodologique d'une morphologie comparée. Bull. Assoc. Russe Rech. Sci. Prague, 4, 1-31.
35. Novikoff, M., 1937. L'homologie et l'homomorphie considerée comme deux bases de l'anatomie comparée. CR Assoc. Anat. 25, 1-6.
36. Novikoff, M., 1938. General and special homomorphism. Acta Biotheor. 4, 85-96.
37. Novikoff, M., 1949a. Zur frage ueber das Prinzip der Homomorphie. Anat. Anzeiger, 95, 118-130.
38. Novikoff, M., 1949b. Grundzüge der Geschichte der biologischen Theorien: Werdegang der abendländischen Lebensbegriffe. Munchen.
39. Novikoff, M., 1953. Regularity of form in organisms. Syst. Zool. 2, 57-62.
40. O'Hara, R.J., 1991. Representation of the natural system in the nineteenth century. Biol. Philos. 6, 255-275.
41. Olmstead, R.G., Scotland, R.W., 2005. Molecular and morphological datasets. Taxon 54, 7-8.
42. Országh, I., 1999. Profesor Michal Novikov - prvý vedúci zoologického pracoviska Univerzity Komenského. Biol. Ekol. Chém. 4, 19-22.
43. Országh, I., 2002. Michal Novikov - Professor of Zoology at the Department of Zoology Comenius University, Bratislava. Acta Zool. Universitatis Comenianae, 44, 5-11.
44. Osborn, H.F., 1902. Homoplasy as a law of latent or potential homology. Am. Nat. 36, 259-271.
45. Ospovat, D., 1981. The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology and Natural Selection, 1838-1859. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Owen, R., 1843. Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843, from notes taken by W. W. Cooper...and revised by Prof. Owen and C. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman, London.
47. Owen, R., 1846. Observation on Mr. Strickland's article on the structural relations of organized beings. Philos. Mag. 28, 525-527.
48. Owen, R., 1847. Report on the archetype and homologies of the vertebrate skeleton. Report of the 16th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Murray, London, pp. 169-340.
49. Owen, R., 1848. On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. London.
50. Owen, R., 1866. On the Anatomy of Vertebrates, Vol. 1 Fishes and Reptiles. Longmans, Green, London.
51. Patterson, C., 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In: Joysey, K.A., Friday, A.E. (Eds), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London, pp. 21-74.
52. Patterson, C., 1987. Introduction. In: Patterson, C. (Eds), Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-22.
53. Patterson, C., 1988. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 603-625.
54. Rieppel, O., 1988. Fundamentals of Comparative Biology. Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
55. Rieppel, O., Kearney, M., 2001. The origin of snakes: Limits of a scientific debate. Biologist, 48, 110-114.
56. Scotland, R.W., 2000. Taxic homology and three-taxon statement analysis. Syst. Biol. 49, 480-500.
57. Seward, A.C., 1931. Plant Life through the Ages: a Geological and Botanical Retrospect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Stevens, P.F., 1984. Haüy and A.-P. Candolle: crystallography, botanical systematics, and comparative morphology, 1780-1840. J. Hist. Biol. 17, 49-82.
59. Swainson, W., 1835. A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals. London.
60. Swainston, A.Y., 1985. William Sharp MacLeay, 1792-1865. Linnean, 1, 11-18.
61. Westwood, J.O., 1840a. Observations upon the relationships existing amongst natural objects, resulting from more or less perfect resemblance, usually termed affinity and analogy. Mag. Nat. Hist. 4, 141-144.
62. Westwood, J.O., 1840b. A few further observations on affinity and analogy. Mag. Nat. Hist. 4, 305-306.
63. Williams, D.M., 2004. Homology and homologues, cladistics and phenetics: 150 years of progress. In: Williams, D.M., Forey, P.L. (Eds.), Milestones in Systematics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 191-224.
64. Williams, D.M., Humphries, C.J., 2004. Homology and character evolution. In: Stuessy, T., Hörandl, E., Mayer, V. (Eds.), Deep Morphology: Toward a Renaissance of Morphology in Plant Systematics. Koeltz, Königstein, pp. 119-130.
65. Winsor, M.P., 1976. Starfish, Jellyfish and the Order of Life: Issues in Nineteenth Century Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.