Taxic homology and three-taxon statement analysis

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 480-500

  Scotland, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Taxic homology; Three taxon statement analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

BASE SEQUENCE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 0034350318     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635159950127358     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ALBERT, V. A., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, AND J. S. FARRIS. 1997. Advantages of parsimony jackknifing. Bien. Int. Conf. Syst. Assoc. 1:56 (Abstr.).
2. BOCK, W. J. 1977. Foundations and methods of evolutionary transformation. Pages 851-895 in Major patterns in vertebrate evolution (M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht, eds.). Plenum, New York.
3. BROWER, A. V. Z. 2000. Homology and the inference of systematic relationships: Some historical and philosophical perspectives. Pages 10-21 in Homology and systematics: Coding characters for phylogenetic analysis (R.W. Scotland and T. Pennington, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
4. CARINE, M. A., AND R. W. SCOTLAND. 1999. Taxic and transformational homology: Different ways of seeing. Cladistics 15:121-129.
5. CARINE, M. A., AND R. W. SCOTLAND. In press. Sixtyeight taxa and 32 characters: Resolving species relationships using morphological data. In Pollen and spores: Morphology and biology (C. Morton, M. M. Harley, and S. H. Blackmore, eds.). Kew, London.
6. CHU, P. C. 1998. A phylogeny of the gulls (Aves: Larinae) inferred from osteological characters and integumentary characters. Cladistics 14:1-43.
7. COLLESS, D. H. 1984. On the status of outgroups in phylogenetics. Syst. Zool. 34:364-366.
8. CRACRAFT, J. 1981. The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics. Am. Zool. 21:21-36.
9. CRANE, P. R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:716-793.
10. DE LAET, J., AND E. SMETS. 1998. On the three-taxon approach to parsimony analysis. Cladistics 14:363-382.
11. DE PINNA, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm, Cladistics 7:317-338.
12. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1985. The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 34:280-299.
13. DOYLE, J. A., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52:321-431.
14. DOYLE, J. A., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1992. Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. Brittonia 44:89-106.
15. ELDRIDGE, N. 1979. Alternative approaches to evolutionary theory. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 14:7-19.
16. FARRIS, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 2 (N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk, eds.). New York Botanical Garden, New York.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLÄRSJÖ, V. A. ALBERT, M. ALLARD, A. ANDERBERG, B. BOWDITCH, C. BULT, J. M. CARPENTER, T. M. CROW, J. DE LAET, K. FITZHUGH, D. FROST, P. GOLOBOFF, C. J. HUMPHRIES, U. JONDELIUS, D. JUDD, P. O. KARIS, D. LIPSCOMB, M. LUCKOW, D. MINDELL, J. MUONA, K. NIXON, W. PRESCH, O. SEBERG, M. E. SIDDALL, L. STRUWE, A. TEHLER, J. WENZEL, Q. WHEELER, AND W. WHEELER. 1995. Explanation. Cladistics 11:211-218.
18. FARRIS, J. S., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1998. A/The brief history of three-taxon analysis. Cladistics 14:349-362.
19. GOODWIN, B. C. 1984. Changing from an evolutionary to a generative paradigm in biology. Pages 99-120 in Evolutionary theory: Paths into the future (J. W. Pollard, ed.). Wiley, New York.
20. HARVEY, A. W. 1992. Three-taxon statements: More precisely, an abuse of parsimony? Cladistics 8:345-354.
21. HAWKINS, J. A. 2000. A survey of primary homology assessment: Different workers perceive and define characters in different ways. Pages 22-53 in Homology and systematics: Coding characters for phylogenetic analysis (R. W. Scotland and T. Pennington, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
22. HAY, A., AND D. J. MABBERLEY. 1994. On perception of plant morphology: Some implications for phylogeny. Pages 101-117 in Shape and form in plants and fungi (D. Ingram and A. Hudson, eds.). Academic Press, London.
23. HILLIS, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383:140-141.
24. KLUGE, A. G. 1993. Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: Ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power. Cladistics 9:246-259.
25. KLUGE, A. G. 1994. Moving targets and shell games. Cladistics 10:403-414.
26. LI, W. S., AND D. GRAUR. 1991. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
27. LIPSCOMB, D. L. 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. Cladistics 8:45-65.
28. LOCONTE, H., AND D. W. STEVENSON. 1990. Cladistics of the spermatophyta. Brittonia 42:197-211.
29. MICKEVITCH, M. F., AND D. L. LIPSCOMB. 1991. Parsimony and the choice between different transformations for the same character set. Cladistics 7:111-149.
30. NELSON, G. J. 1978. Ontogeny, phylogeny, palaeontology, and the biogenetic law. Syst. Zool. 27:324-345.
31. NELSON, G. J. 1994. Homology and systematics. Pages 101-149 in Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (B. K. Hall, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego.
32. NELSON, G. J. 1996. Nullius in verba. J. Comp. Biol. 1:141-152.
33. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1992a. Information content and fractional weight of three-item statements. Syst. Biol. 41:490-494.
34. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1992b. TAS and TAX: MSDOS programs for cladistics, version 3.0. Published by the authors, New York and Melbourne.
35. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1993. Missing data and three-item analysis. Cladistics 9:111-114.
36. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1994. Three-item consensus: Empirical test of fractional weighting. Pages 193-209 in Models in phylogeny reconstruction (R. W. Scotland, D. J. Siebert, and D. M. Williams, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
37. NELSON, G. J.,AND N. I. PLATNICK. 1991. Three-taxon statements: A more precise use of parsimony? Cladistics 7:351-366.
38. NIXON, K. C., W. L. CREPET, D. STEVENSON, AND E. M. FRIIS. 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:484-533.
39. OYAMA, S. 1988. Stasis development and heredity. Pages 255-274 in Evolutionary processes and metaphors (M.-W. Ho and S. W. Fox, eds.). Wiley, New York.
40. OYAMA, S. 1989. Ontogeny and the central dogma: Do we need the concept of genetic programming in order to have an evolutionary perspective? Pages 1-34 in Systems and development (M. R. Gunnar and E. Thelen, eds.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
41. PATTERSON, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pages 21-74 in Problems in phylogenetic reconstruction (K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday, eds.). Academic Press, London.
42. PATTERSON, C. 1988. The impact of evolutionary theories on systematics. Pages 59-91 in Prospects in systematics (D. L. Hawksworth, ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
43. PATTERSON, C., AND G. D. JOHNSON. 1997. The data, the matrix, and the message: Comment on Begle's "Relationships of the Osmeroid Fishes." Syst. Biol. 46:358-365.
44. PLATNICK, N. I., C. J. HUMPHRIES, G. J. NELSON, AND D. M. WILLIAMS 1996. Is Farris optimization perfect? Three taxon statements and multiple branching. Cladistics 12:243-252.
45. PLEIJEL, F. 1995. On character coding for phytogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 11:309-315.
46. PLEIJEL, F., AND T. DAHLGREN. 1998. Position and delineation of Chrysopetalidae and Hesionidae (Annelida, Polychaeta, Phyllodocida). Cladistics 14:129-150.
47. RIEDL, R. 1979. Order in living organisms. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
48. RIEPPEL, O. 1988. Fundamentals of comparative biology. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.
49. RIEPPEL, O. 1994. Homology, topology, and typology: The history of modern debates. Pages 63-100 in Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (B. K. Hall, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego.
50. SANDERSON, M. J., AND L. HUFFORD. 1996. Homoplasy and the evolutionary process: An afterword. Pages 327-330 in Homoplasy: The recurrence of similarity in evolution (M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego.
51. SATTLER, R. 1984. Homology - a continuing challenge. Syst. Bot. 9:382-394.
52. SATTLER, R. 1994. Homology, homeosis and process morphology in plants. Pages 423-475 in Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (B. K. Hall, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego.
53. SCOTLAND, R. W. 2000. Homology, coding and threetaxon statement analysis. Pages 145-182 in Homology and systematics: Coding characters for phylogenetic analysis. (R. W. Scotland and T. Pennington, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
54. STEVENS, P. F. 1984. Homology and phytogeny: Morphology and systematics. Syst. Bot. 9:395-409.
55. UDOVICIC, F., G. I. MCFADDEN, AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1995. Phylogeny of Eucalyptus and Angophora based on 5S rDNA spacer sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:247-256.
56. WESTON, P. 2000. Process morphology from a cladistic perspective. Pages 124-144 in Homology and systematics: Coding characters for phylogenetic analysis. (R. W. Scotland and T. Pennington, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
57. WILLIAMS, D. M. 1996. Fossil species of the diatom genus Tetracyclus (Bacillariophyta, 'ellipticus' species group): Morphology, interrelationships and the relevance of ontogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 351:1759-1782.
58. WILLIAMS, D. M., AND D. J. SIEBERT. 2000. Characters, homology and three-item analysis. Pages 183-208 in Homology and systematics: Coding characters for phylogenetic analysis (R. W. Scotland and T. Pennington, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.