A study of predicting taxpayer's acceptance of e-taxation

WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 592-599

  Chen, Ching Wen ^a   Huang, Echo ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Diffusion of innovation; Perceived readiness; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; FEES AND CHARGES; FORECASTING; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; PERCEIVED READINESS; TECHNOLOGY ACEPTANCE MODEL;

TAXATION;

EID: 33847704827     PISSN: 17900832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E., Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.4, 2000, pp.665-694.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Science, Vol.30, No.2, 1999, pp.227-247.
3. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewoood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
4. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. Structural modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 3, 1988. pp. 411-423.
5. Bentler, P., Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, 1990, pp. 238-246.
6. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, USA. 1992.
7. Chau, Y.K. and Hu, J. H., Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach, Decision Sciences, Vol.32, No.4, 2001, pp.699-718.
8. Chen, L.-D, Gillenson, M. L., and Sherrell, D. L., Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective, Information & Management, Vol.39, 2002, pp.705-719.
9. Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A., On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in mis research: a note of caution, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 237-246.
10. Curran, J.M., Meuter, M.L., and Surprenant, C.F., Intentions to use self-service technologies: a confluence of multiple attitude. Journal of Service Research, Vol.5, No.3, 2003, pp.209-224.
11. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, 1989, pp.319-339.
12. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, 1981, pp. 39-50.
14. Gefen, D., and Straub, D., The relative importance of perceived ease of use in is adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2000, http://jais.aisnet.org/articles/default.asp?vol=1&art=8
15. Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., and Littleboy, D., Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol,17, No,4/5, 2004, pp.286-301.
16. Koufaris, M., Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior, Information System Research, Vol.13, No.2, 2002, pp.205-223.
17. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J, Sena, M. P., and Zhuang, Y., The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web, Decision Support Systems, Vol.29, 2000, pp.269-282.
18. Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P., Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, Vol. 40, 2003, pp. 191-204.
19. Liljander, V., Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J., and van Riel, A., Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2006, pp. 177-191.
20. Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J., and van Riel, A., Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol.13, 2006, pp. 177-191.
21. McKnight, D. H, Choudhuryb, V., and Kacmar, C. The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, 2002. pp. 297-323.
22. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R., and Bitner, M. J., Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters, Journal of Marketing, Vol.64, 2000, pp.50-64.
23. Moon, J., and Kim, W. Y.G., Extending the TAM for a world wide web context, Information & Management, Vol. 38, No.4, 2001, pp.217-230.
24. Moore,G.C., and Benbasat, I., Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information System Research Vol.2, No.3, 1991, pp. 192-222.
25. Parasuraman, A. Technology readiness index(tri):a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies, Journal of Service Research, Vol.2, No.4, 2000, pp.307-320.
26. Parasuraman, A., and Colby, C.L., Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customer Adopt Technology. Free Press, New York, 2001.
27. Reddick, C. G., Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, Vol.22, 2005, pp.38-57.
28. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed., Free Press, New York, NY, 1995.
29. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.6, 1995.pp. 144-176.
30. Tornatzky, L.G., and Klein, K.J., Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.29, No.1, 1982, pp.28-45.
31. Zmud, R.W., and Boynton, A.C., Survey measures and instruments in mis: inventory and appraisal, in K. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991. pp. 149-180.