Efficacy of manipulation for non-specific neck pain of recent onset: Design of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Leaver, Andrew M ^a   Refshauge, Kathryn M ^a   Maher, Christopher G ^a   Latimer, Jane ^a   Herbert, Rob D ^a   Jull, Gwendolen ^b   McAuley, James H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHIROPRACTIC; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; NECK PAIN; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; BRAIN STEM INFARCTIONS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MANIPULATION, SPINAL; MASSAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK MUSCLES; NECK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33847701329     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-18     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. G Bronfort M Haas RL Evans LM Bouter, Spine J 2004 4 3 335 356 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002 15125860
2. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. AR Gross JL Hoving TA Haines CH Goldsmith T Kay P Aker G Bronfort G Cervical Overview, Spine 2004 29 14 1541 1548 10.1097/01.BRS.0000131218.35875.ED 15247576
3. Manipulation and Mobilization of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review of the Literature. ELDCPD Hurwitz PDDC Aker AHDC Adams WCDCMPH Meeker PGMDPD Shekelle, Spine 1996 21 15 1746 1759 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00007 8855459
4. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BW Koes WJ Assendelft GJ van der Heijden LM Bouter PG Knipschild, Bmj 1991 303 6813 1298 1303 1836153
5. Effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain: a review. P Sarigiovannis B Hollins, Physical Therapy Reviews 2005 10 1 35 50 10.1179/108331905X43436
6. Spinal manipulative therapy is an independent risk factor for vertebral artery dissection. WS Smith SC Johnston EJ Skalabrin M Weaver P Azari GW Albers DR Gress, Neurology 2003 60 9 1424 1428 12743225
7. Vascular accidents from cervical spine manipulation: Report on 107 cases. AGJ Terrett, Journal of the Australian chiropractors association 1987 17 1 15 24
8. Clinical guidelines for assessing vertebrobasilar insufficiency in the management of cervical spine disorders. D Rivett D Shirley M Magarey K Refshauge, Australian Physiotherapy Association Melbourne 2006
9. A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. G Bronfort R Evans B Nelson PD Aker CH Goldsmith H Vernon, Spine 2001 26 7 788 97; discussion 798-9 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00020 11295901
10. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. JD Cassidy AA Lopes K Yong-Hing, Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 1992 15 9 570 575
11. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on pain reduction and range of motion in patients with acute unilateral neck pain: a pilot study. JR Pikula, Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association 1999 43 111 119
12. Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: A population-based case-control study. DM Rothwell SJ Bondy JI Williams, Stroke 2001 32 1054 1060 11340209
13. Causes of complications from cervical spine manipulation. T Mann K Refshauge, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2001 47 255 266 11722294
14. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. RP DiFabio, Physical Therapy 1999 79 50 65 9920191
15. Risk factors and precipitating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. SMDPDF Haldeman FJDC Kohlbeck MDC McGregor MSc, Spine April 15, 24(8):785-794 1999
16. Safety in chiropractic practice. Part 1: the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents after manipulation to the neck in Denmark from 1978-1988. N Klougart Y Leboeuf-Yde LR Rasmusssen, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1996 19 371 377
17. Cervical spine manipulation: summary report of a systematic review of the literature and a multidisciplinary expert panel. PG Shekelle I Coulter, Journal of Spinal Disorders 1997 10 223 228 10.1097/00002517-199706000-00007 9213278
18. Neurological complications after spinal manipulation: a regional survey. JN Dunne N Heye D Minns., 7th Scientific Conference of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists 2000 Perth
19. Chiropractic spinal manipulation for neck pain: a systematic review. E Ernst, Journal of Pain 2003 4 8 417 421 10.1067/S1526-5900(03)00735-1 14622659
20. Neck manipulation as a cause of stroke. JT Robertson, Stroke 1981 12 1 7222150
21. Pre-manipulative testing of the cervical spine review, revision and new clinical guidelines. M Magarey T Rebbeck B Coughlan K Grimmer D Rivett K Refshauge, Manual Ther 2004 9 95 108 10.1016/j.math.2003.12.002
22. Reported occurrence and nature of complications following manipualtive physiotherapy in South Africa. A Michaeli, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1993 39 4 309 315
23. Professional responsibility in relation to cervical spine manipulation. KM Refshauge S Parry D Shirley D Larsen D Rivett R Boland, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002 48, 171 179
24. Classification of chronic pain. Description of pain terms and definitions of pain terms. H Merskey N Bogduk, Seattle, IASP Press 2nd 1994 210
25. How Australian takes a Census. D Trewin, Australian Bureau of Statistics 2000
26. Exercise-based rehabilitation for injured workers: programme efficacy and identification of factors predicting programme completion and outcome. DT Kenny, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2000 23 7 17 10826121
27. Australian Standard Classification of Education (ASCED). D Trewin, Australian Bureau of Statistics 2000
28. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures. SV Scrimshaw C Maher, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2001 24 8 501 504 10.1067/mmt.2001.118208
29. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. HT Vernon S Mior, Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics 1991 14 7 409 415
30. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. MD Westaway PW Stratford JM Binkley, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1998 27 5 331 338
31. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. JE Ware M Kosinski SD Keller, Medical Care 1996 34 3 220 233 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 8628042
32. Clinical Trials: a Practical Approach. SJ Pocock, John Wiley 1983 Chichester
33. Acute Neck Pain. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain A guide for clinicians Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Guidelines Group Brisbane, Australia Academic Press 2004
34. Clinical practice guideline on the use of manipulation or mobilization in the treatment of adults with mechanical neck disorders. AR Gross TM Kay C Kennedy D Gasner L Hurley K Yardley L Hendry L McLaughlin, Manual Ther 2002 7 4 193 205 10.1054/math.2002.0477
35. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. JE Ware CD Sherbourne, Medical Care 1992 30 473 483 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 1593914
36. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. RWJG Ostelo HCW de Vet, Best Practice & Research in Clinical Rheumatology 2005 19 4 593 607 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003
37. Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. HCW de Vet MW Heymans KM Dunn DP Pope AJ van der Beek GJ Macfarlane LM Bouter PR Croft, Spine 2002 27 21 2409 2416 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00016 12438991
38. Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects. D Kalauokalani D Cherkin K Sherman T Koepsell R Deyo, Spine 2001 26 13 1418 1424 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00005 11458142
39. Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. EL Hurwitz H Morgenstern M Vassilaki LM Chiang, Spine 2005 30 13 1477 1484 10.1097/01.brs.0000167821.39373.c1 15990659