Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 997-1007

  Bush, Shane S ^a   Barth, Jeffrey T ^a   Pliskin, Neil H ^a   Arffa, Sharon ^a   Axelrod, Bradley N ^a   Blackburn, Lynn B ^a   Faust, David ^a   Fisher, Jerid M ^a   Harley, J Preston ^a   Heilbronner, Robert L ^a   Larrabee, Glenn J ^a   Perry, William ^a   Puente, Antonio E ^a   Silver, Cheryl H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Court ordered; Examination; Forensic; Independent; Neuropsychological

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; INDEPENDENCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;

EID: 27844584811     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Policy statement on the presence of third party observers in neuropsychological assessment The Clinical Neuropsychologist 15 2001 433 439
2. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on ethical complaints made against clinical neuropsychologists during adversarial proceedings The Clinical Neuropsychologist 17 4 2003 443 445
3. American Psychological Association Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct American Psychologist 57 12 2002 1060 1073
4. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists Law and Human Behavior 15 6 1991 655 665
5. M. Connell, and G.P. Koocher HIPAA and forensic practice American Psychology Law Society News 23 2 2003 16 19
6. J.M. Fisher, D. Johnson-Greene, and J.T. Barth Examination, diagnosis, and interventions in clinical neuropsychology in general and with special populations: An overview S.S. Bush M.L. Drexler Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology 2002 Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers Lisse, NL 3 22
7. D. Johnson-Greene NAN Policy and Planning Committee Informed consent: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 20 3 2005 335 340
8. National Academy of Neuropsychology Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 15 5 2000 379 380
9. National Academy of Neuropsychology Test security: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 15 5 2000 383 386
10. J.J. Sweet, C. Grote, and W.G. van Gorp Ethical issues in forensic neuropsychology S.S. Bush M.L. Drexler Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology 2002 Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers Lisse, NL 103 133
11. J.J. Sweet, and M.A. Moulthrop Self-examination questions as a means of identifying bias in adversarial assessments Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 1 1 1999 73 88
12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Accessed October 2, 2003 at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa.