Perceptions of interprofessional roles within the spinal cord injury rehabilitation team

International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 143-150

  Pellatt, Glynis Collis ^a  

^a STOKE MANDEVILLE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interprofessional; Perceptions; Rehabilitation; Relationships; Role; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847696640     PISSN: 17411645     EISSN: 1759779X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2005.12.4.18258     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Appleton J (1995) Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs 22(5): 993-7
2. Bailey P (1997) Finding your way around qualitative methods in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 25(1): 18-22
3. Barnitt R, Pomeroy V (1995) A holistic approach to rehabilitation. Br J Ther Rehabil 2(2): 87-92
4. Beattie A (1995) War and peace amongst the health tribes. In: Soothill K, Mackay L, Webb C eds. Interprofessional Relations in Health Care. Edward Arnold, London: 11-30
5. Bellner A (1999) Senses of responsibility: a challenge for occupational and physical therapists in the context of ongoing professionalisation. Scand J Caring Sci 13(1): 55-62
6. Bowie I (1999) Assessment in rehabilitation. In: Davis S, O’Connor S, eds. Rehabilitation Nursing. Foundations for Practice. Bailliere Tindall, Edinburgh: 83-116
7. Bromley I (1998) Tetraplegia and Paraplegia: A Guide for Physiotherapists 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
8. Canales M (2000) Othering: toward an understanding of difference. Adv Nurs Sci 22(4): 16-31
9. Clarke A, Jack B (1998) The benefits of using qualitative research. Prof Nurs 13(12): 845-7
10. Cooley E (1994) Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research 25(1): 5-15
11. Cutcliffe J, McKenna H (1999) Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. J Adv Nurs 30(2): 374-80
12. Dalley J, Sim J (2001) Nurses perceptions of physiotherapists as team members. Clin Rehabil 15(4): 380-9
13. Davies C (2002) Managing identities: workers, professions and identity. Nurs Manage 9(5): 15-20
14. Department of Health (1996) In the Patient’s Best Interest: Multiprofessional Working Across Organisational Boundaries. Department of Health, London
15. Edwards A (2002) A rehabilitation framework for patientfocussed care. Nurs Stand 16(50): 38-44
16. El Masry W (2003) National Service Frameworks for long term conditions. In: Family and Social Impact of Spinal Cord Injury: Delegate Notes. 20th Guttmann Multidisciplinary Meeting, Stoke Mandeville Hospital Trust, Aylesbury, Bucks
17. Embling S (1995) Exploring multidisciplinary teamwork. Br J Ther Rehabil 2(3): 124-9
18. Fountain M (1993) Key roles and issues of the multidisciplinary team. Semin Oncol Nurs 9(1): 25-31
19. Gibbon B (1992) The role of the nurse in rehabilitation. Nurs Stand 6(36): 32-5
20. Glass C (1999) Spinal Cord Injury: Impact and Coping. BPS Books, Leicester
21. Grbich C (1999) Qualitative Research in Health. An Introduction. Sage, London
22. Griffin S (1994) Working in health care teams: the perceptions of occupational therapists. J Rehabil Jan-Mar: 17-23
23. Guttmann L (1976) Spinal Cord Injuries: Comprehensive Management and Research. 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
24. Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd edn. Routledge, London
25. Harrison P (2000) Managing Spinal Injury: Critical Care. Spinal Injuries Association, London
26. Hitchcock R, Hutchings C, Stephenson S, Ward C (1998) Neurological rehabilitation in Indonesia and the UK: differences and similarities. J Allied Health 27(1): 45-50
27. Hudson B (2002) Interprofessionality in health and social care: the Achilles heel of partnership? J Interprof Care 16(1): 7-17
28. Hugman R (1991) Power in the Caring Professions. Macmillan Education, Basingstoke
29. Johnson M (1995) Achieving effective rehabilitation outcomes: does the nurse have a role? Br J Ther Rehabil 2(3): 113-18
30. Leathard A (1994) Interprofessional developments in Britain. In: Leathard A, ed. Going Interprofessional. Routledge, London: 3-37
31. Lenkman S, Gribbins R (1994) Multidisciplinary teams in the acute care setting. Holist Nurs Pract 8(3): 81-7
32. Lupton D (1997) Doctors on the medical profession. Sociol Health Illn 19(4): 480-97
33. Marshall C, Rossman G (1995) Designing Qualitative Research. 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
34. May T (1997) Social Research: Issues Methods and Process. 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham
35. Miller C, Ross N, Freeman M (1999) Shared Learning and Clinical Teamwork: New Directions in Education for Multiprofessional Practice. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London
36. Natterlund B, Ahlstrom G (1999) Experience of social support in rehabilitation: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 30(6): 1332-40
37. Nolan M, Booth A, Nolan J (1997) New Directions in Rehabilitation: Exploring the Nursing Contribution. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London
38. Ovretveit J (1996) Five ways to describe a multidisciplinary team. J Interprof Care 10(2): 163-73
39. Oxford Compact Dictionary and Thesaurus (1997) Oxford University Press, Oxford
40. Patton M (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park
41. Pellatt G (2003a) Perceptions of the nursing role in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Br J Nurs 12(5): 292-9
42. Pellatt G (2003b) Ethnography and reflexivity: emotions and feelings in fieldwork. Nurse Res 10(3): 28-37
43. Punch K (1998) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Sage, London
44. Rose K, Webb C (1998) Analysing data: maintaining rigour in a qualitative study. Qual Health Res 8(4): 556-62
45. Rowe H (1996) Multidisciplinary teamwork-myth or reality? J Nurs Manage 4(2): 93-101
46. Scholes J, Vaughan B (2002) Cross-boundary working: implications for the multiprofessional team. J Clin Nurs 11(3): 399-408
47. Schonherr M, Groothoff J, Mulder G, Eisma W (2000) Prediction of functional outcome after spinal cord injury: a task for the rehabilitation team and the patient. Spinal Cord 38(8): 185-91
48. Scott E, Cowen B (1997) Multidisciplinary collaborative care planning. Nurs Stand 21(1): 39-42
49. Smith K, Biley F (1997) Understanding grounded theory: principles and evaluation. Nurse Res 4(3): 17-29
50. Strasser D, Smits S, Falconer J, Herrin J, Bowen S (1994) The influence of hospital culture on rehabilitation team functioning in VA hospitals. J Rehabil Res Dev 39(1): 115-25
51. Thorne S (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. EBN Noteb 3(1): 68-70
52. Trieschmann R (1988) Spinal Cord Injuries: Psychosocial, Social and Vocational Rehabilitation. 2nd edn. Demos, New York
53. Waters K, Luker K (1996) Staff perspectives on the role of the nurse in a rehabilitation ward for elderly people. J Clin Nurs 5(2): 105-14
54. White M, Olsen M (1998) Attitudes toward people with disabilities: a comparison of rehabilitation nurses, occupational therapists and physical therapists. Rehabil Nurs 23(3): 126-31
55. Williams T, England M (1997) Sociology, physical activity and spinal cord rehabilitation. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 3(1): 56-66
56. Wilmot S (1995) Professional values and interprofessional dialogue. J Interprof Care 10(2):163-71
57. Yarkony G (1994) Overview of spinal cord injury in the acute phase, the rehabilitation team and classification of spinal cord lesions. In: Yarkony G, ed. Spinal Cord Injury: Medical Management and Rehabilitation. Aspen, Maryland: 3-8