Prediction of functional outcome after spinal cord injury: A task for the rehabilitation team and the patient

Spinal Cord

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 185-191

  Schonherr M C ^a,b,c   Groothoff, J W ^b   Mulder, G A ^a,b   Eisma, W H ^b,c  

^a Beatrixoord Rehabilitation Centre   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Functional outcome; Prediction; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PARAPLEGIA; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUADRIPLEGIA; REHABILITATION CENTER; SELF CARE; SKILL; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034069388     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100965     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1 Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplcgia. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 242-247.
2. 2 Waters RL, Yakura YS, Adkins RH, Sie I. Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1992; 73: 784-789.
3. 3 Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 67-72.
4. 4 Woolsey RM. Rehabilitation outcome following spinal cord injury. Arch Neurol 1985; 42: 116-119.
5. 5 Yarkony GM, et al. Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Neurol 1987; 44: 93-96.
6. 6 Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH. Functional outcome of patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 464-475.
7. 7 Lazar LB, et al. Prediction of functional outcome by motor capability after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 819-822.
8. 8 Mizukami M et al. Relationship between functional levels and movement in tetraplegic patients. A retrospective study. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 189-194.
9. 9 Welch RD, Lobley SJ, O'Sullivan SB, Freed MM. Functional independence in quadriplegia: critical levels. Arch Phys Mcd Rehabil 1986; 67: 235-240.
10. 10 Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell L. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcome: the impact of age. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 173-177.
11. 11 DeVivo MJ et al. The influence of age at time of spinal cord injury on rehabilitation outcome. Arch Neurol 1990; 47: 687 691.
12. 12 Nene AV, Hermens HJ, Zilvold G. Paraplegic locomotion: a review. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 507-523.
13. 13 Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH. Rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord lesions in the Netherlands: an cpidemiological study. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 679-683.
14. 14 ASIA/IMSOP. Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury - Revised 1992. American Spinal Injury Association, Chicago, 1992.
15. 15 Brown PJ, Marino RJ, Herbison GJ, Ditunno Jr JF. The 72-hour examination as a predictor of recovery in motor complete quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 546-548.
16. 16 Curt A, Dietz V. Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injury; significance for predicting outcome. Spinal Cord 1999; 37: 157-165.
17. 17 Yarkony GM et al. Functional skills after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: three-year longitudinal follow-up. Arch Phys Mcd Rehabil 1988; 69: 111-114.