Ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlations between high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-7

  Kanemaki, Yoshihide ^a   Kurihara, Yasuyuki ^a   Okamoto, Kyoko ^a   Nakajima, Yasuo ^a   Fukuda, Mamoru ^a   Maeda, Ichiro ^a   Akiyama, Futoshi ^b  

^a ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ductal carcinoma in situ; High resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR MRI); Periductal enhancement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CELL INFILTRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDEMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33847693142     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-006-0091-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Harris JR. In situ carcinomas. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 355-68.
2. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;172:235-41.
3. Rosner D, Bedwani R, Vana J, Baker HW, Murphy GP. Noninvasive breast carcinoma: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1980;192:139-47.
4. Harris J, Lippman M, Veronesi U, Willett W. Breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;327:319-28.
5. Stomper P, Margolin F. Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:585-91.
6. Basset LW. Mammographic analysis of calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 192;30:93-105.
7. Meyer J, Timothy J, Stomper P, et al. Biopsy of occult breast lesions: analysis of 1261 abnormalities. JAMA 1990;263:2341-3.
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30.
9. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS, Evans WP, Savino DA, Krakos PA, et al. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1996;201:427-32.
10. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon AA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;196:415-9.
11. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology 1998;207:675-81.
12. Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, Ikoh D, Kamijo K, Nakajima Y, Fukuda M, et al. MR mammary ductography using a microscopy coil for assessment of intraductal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1340-2.
13. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
14. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR, Colburn WJ, Barth A, Gierson ED, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet 1995;345:1154-7.
15. The Van Nuys ductal carcinoma in situ classification: an update. In: Silverstein MJ (ed) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 241-6.
16. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202:833-41.
17. Liberman L, Abramson A, Squires F, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:35-40.
18. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95-103.
19. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, Hashiguchi N, Sakai S, Masuda K, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996;200:639-49.
20. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast mass with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;217:841-8.