Criminal law in the regulation of somatic cell nuclear transfer

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 73-75

  Viens, A M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b HERTFORD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CRIMINAL LAW; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; NOTE;

CANADA; CRIMINAL LAW; HUMANS; MORALS; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES;

EID: 33847685631     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160601111735     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Billingsley, B. and T. Caulfield. 2004. The regulation of science and the charter of rights: Would a ban on non-reproductive human cloning unjustifiably violate freedom of expression? Queen's Law Journal 29: 647-679.
2. Campbell, A. 2002. A place for criminal law in the regulation of reproductive technologies. Health Law Journal 10: 77-101.
3. Caulfield, T., and T. Bubela. 2007. Why a criminal ban?: Analyzing the arguments against somatic cell nuclear transfer in the Canadian parliamentary debate. The American Journal of Bioethics 7(2): 51-61.
4. Devlin, P. 1965. The enforcement of morals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Kass, L. 2002. Life, liberty and the defense of dignity. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.
6. Marshall, S. E., and R.A. Duff. 1998. Criminalisation and Sharing Wrongs. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 11: 7-22.
7. R. v. Labaye. 2005. SCC 80.
8. Rasmussen, C. 2004. Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act: Is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies? Saskatchewan Law Review 67: 97-135.
9. Standing Committee on Health. 2001. Assisted human reproduction: Building families. Ottawa, ONT: PublicWorks and Government Services Canada Publishing.