A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 525-531

  Pongchaiyakul, C ^a   Panichkul, S ^b   Songpatanasilp, T ^b   Nguyen, T V ^c  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b PHRAMONGKUTKLAO HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Epidemiology; Nomogram; Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODEL; NOMOGRAM; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THAILAND; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; CALCANEUS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 33847670094     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0279-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Raisz LG (2005) Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects. J Clin Invest 115:3318-3325
2. Nguyen ND, Pongchaiyakul C, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2005). Identification of high-risk individuals for hip fracture: a 14-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 20:1921-1928
3. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185-1194
4. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929-1936
5. National Osteoporosis Foundation (2003) Physician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis 2003. Available online at http://www.nof.org/. Accessed June 25, 2006
6. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785-795
7. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Clarke BL, Gray TK, Harris DW, et al (2003) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 9:544-564
8. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288:1889-1897
9. Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229-238
10. Richy F, Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Mawet A, Reginster JY (2004) Primary prevention of osteoporosis: mass screening scenario or prescreening with questionnaires? An economic perspective. J Bone Miner Res 19:1955-1960
11. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254-1259
12. (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1-129
13. Nelson HD, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Allan JD (2002) Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A review of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:529-541
14. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I, Ehrlich G, Kanis J, et al (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10:259-264
15. Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, et al (2001) A simple tool to identify asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:699-705
16. Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen ND, Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen TV (2004) Development and validation of a new clinical risk index for prediction of osteoporosis in Thai women. J Med Assoc Thai 87:910-916
17. Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen ND, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2005) Clinical risk indices, prediction of osteoporosis, and prevention of fractures: diagnostic consequences and costs. Osteoporos Int 16:1444-1450
18. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA (2004) Bone mineral density-independent association of quantitative ultrasound measurements and fracture risk in women. Osteoporos Int 15:942-947
19. Marin F, Gonzalez-Macias J, Diez-Perez A, Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M (2006) Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res 21:1126-1135
20. Lippuner K, Fuchs G, Ruetsche AG, Perrelet R, Casez JP, Neto I (2000) How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? A cost- analysis. J Clin Densitom 3:241-249
21. Cetin A, Erturk H, Celiker R, Sivri A, Hascelik Z (2001) The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Rheumatol Int 20:55-59
22. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination? Osteoporos Int 11:425-433
23. Panichkul S, Sripramote M, Sriussawaamorn N (2004) Diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement in case finding for osteoporosis in Thai postmenopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:418-426
24. Nayak S, Olkin I, Liu H, Grabe M, Gould MK, Allen IE, et al (2006) Meta-analysis: accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 144:832-841
25. Limpaphayom KK, Taechakraichana N, Jaisamrarn U, Bunyavejchevin S, Chaikittisilpa S, Poshyachinda M, et al (2000) Bone mineral density of lumbar spine and proximal femur in normal Thai women. J Med Assoc Thai 83:725-731
26. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology 143:29-36
27. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845
28. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361-387
29. Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
30. He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, et al (2000) Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 11:354-360
31. Greenspan SL, Cheng S, Miller PD, Orwoll ES (2001) Clinical performance of a highly portable, scanning calcaneal ultrasonometer. Osteoporos Int 12:391-398
32. Chneider J, Bundschuh B, Spath C, Landkammer C, Muller H, Sommer U, et al (2004) Discrimination of patients with and without vertebral fractures as measured by ultrasound and DXA osteodensitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 74:246-254
33. Hollevoet N, Verdonk R, Goemaere S, Van Maele G (2004) Tibial ultrasound velocity in women with wrist fracture. J Clin Densitom 7:302-306
34. Nicholson PH, Bouxsein ML (2002) Effect of temperature on ultrasonic properties of the calcaneus in situ. Osteoporos Int 13:888-892
35. Pocock NA, Babichev A, Culton N, Graney K, Rooney J, Bell D, et al (2000) Temperature dependency of quantitative ultrasound. Osteoporos Int 11:316-320
36. Evans WD, Jones EA, Owen GM (1995) Factors affecting the in vivo precision of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation. Phys Med Biol 40:137-151
37. Ikeda Y, Iki M (2004) Precision control and seasonal variations in quantitative ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus. J Bone Miner Metab 22:588-593
38. Wong SL, Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG (2005) A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Ann Surg Oncol 12:282-288
39. Kattan MW (2003) Nomograms are superior to staging and risk grouping systems for identifying high-risk patients: preoperative application in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 13:111-116
40. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (2004) Limited utility of clinical risk indices in the identification of postmenopausal women with incident fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:49-55