A randomized prospective study comparing the cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway-classic during controlled ventilation for gynecological laparoscopy

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 102-105

  Galvin, Eilish M ^a   Van Doorn, Mirjam ^a   Blazquez, Juan ^a   Ubben, Johannes F ^a   Zijlstra, Freek J ^a   Klein, Jan ^a   Verbrugge, Serge J C ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIVACURIUM; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BRONCHOSPASM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGICAL PATIENT; THROAT DISEASE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; INSTRUMENTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGEAL MASKS;

EID: 33847663270     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246812.21391.d1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Akca O, Wadhwa A, Sengupts P, et al. The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures. Anesth Analg 2004;99:272-8.
2. Gaitini L, Yanovski B, Somri M, et al. A comparison between the PLA Cobra and the laryngeal mask airway unique during spontaneous ventilation: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Analg 2006;102:631-6.
3. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Fick GH. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-classic vs. tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:622-6.
4. Bapat PP, Verghese C. Laryngeal mask airway and the incidence of regurgitation during gynecological laparoscopies. Anesth Analg 1997;85:139-43.
5. Maino P, Dullenkopf A, Keller C, et al. Cuff filling volumes and pressures in pediatric laryngeal mask airways. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:25-30.
6. Cros AM, Pitti R, Conil C, et al. Severe dysphonia after use of a laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 1997;86:498-500.
7. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996;82:129-33.
8. Asai T. Editorial II. Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth 2004;93:497-500.
9. CobraPLA product information sheet. Availabe at www.engmedsys.com.
10. Classic laryngeal mask airway product information sheet. Availabe at www.lmana.com.
11. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. Proseal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:824-7.
12. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, et al. Standard laryngeal mask airway and LMA-Proseal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:428-32.
13. Turan A, Kaya G, Koyuncu O, et al. Comparison of the laryngeal mask (LMA™) and laryngeal tube (LT®) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA®) in short surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:234-8.