Comparison of the laryngeal mask (LMA™) and laryngeal tube (LT®) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA®) in short surgical procedures

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 234-238

  Turan, A ^a   Kaya, G ^a   Koyuncu, O ^a   Karamanlioglu, B ^a   Pamukcu Z ^a  

^a TRAKYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adverse effects; Anaesthesia general; Haemodynamic phenomena, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygenation; Laryngeal masks

Indexed keywords

MIVACURIUM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEDICAL RECORD; OXYGEN SATURATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CARBON DIOXIDE; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; PHARYNGITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 33344460878     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021505002243     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11 910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129-133.
2. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 801-805.
3. Dorges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schumucker P. The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1220-1222.
4. Agrò I, Barzoi G, Carassiti M, Gallì B. Getting the tube in the oesophagus and oxygen in the trachea: preliminary results with the new supraglottic device (Cobra™) in 28 anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 920-921.
5. Akca O, Wadhwa A, Sengupta P et al. The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 272-278.
6. Agrò I, Barzoi G, Gallì B. The CobraPLA in 110 anaesthetized and paralysed patients: what size to choose? Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 777-778.
7. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-109.
8. Wakeling HG, Butler PJ, Baxter PJC. The laryngeal mask airway: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 687-690.
9. Dingley J, Whitehead MJ, Wareham K. A comparative study of the incidence of sore throat with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 251-254.
10. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 26-31.
11. Mizutamari E, Yano T, Ushijima K et al. A comparison of postoperative sore throat after use of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube. J Anesth 2004; 18: 151-157.
12. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G et al. The pressor response after laryngeal mask or cuffed oropharyngeal airway insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 1053-1056.
13. Braude N, Clements EA, Hodges UM, Andrews BP. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion: a comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 551-554.
14. Casati A, Vinciguerra F, Spreafico E et al. Cardiovascular changes after extraglottic airway insertion: a prospective, randomized comparison between the laryngeal mask or the new PAX press. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 354-358.
15. Kanaya N, Hirata N, Kurosawa S, Nakayama M, Namiki A. Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on heart rate variability. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 34-40.