Theoretical and practical problems for imagery in stroke rehabilitation: An observation solution

Rehabilitation Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-10

  Holmes, Paul S ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Imagery; Observation; Stroke rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGERY; KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; STROKE; VISION;

EID: 33847660949     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.52.1.1     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Babiloni, C., Babiloni, F., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Del Percio, C., Vito Moretti, D., & Rossini, P. M. (2002). Quantitative EEG: Modeling time, space, and phase of brain oscillatory activity. In R. C. Reisin, M. R. Nuwer, M. Hallett, & C. Medina (Eds.), Advances in clinical neurophysiology (pp. 284-288). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
2. Beaumont, J. G. (2004). Clinical neuropsychology in rehabilitation. In M. Stokes (Ed.), Physical management in neurological rehabilitation (pp. 461-468). London: Elsevier-Mosby.
3. Berthoz, A. (1996). The role of inhibition in the hierarchical gating of executed and imagined movements. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 101-113.
4. Billard, A., & Arbib, M. (2002). Mirror neurons and the neural basis for learning by imitation: Computational modelling. In M. I. Stamenov & V. Gallese (Eds.), Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language (pp 343-353). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
5. Bodini, B., Iacoboni, M., & Lenzi, G. L. (2004). Acute stroke effects on emotions: An interpretation through the mirror system. Current Opinion in Neurology, 17, 55-60.
6. Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K. M., & Menon, R. (2005). On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 226-239.
7. Calmels, C., Holmes, P., Jarry, G., Hars, M., Lopez, E., Paillard, A., & Stam, C. J. (2006). Variability of EEG synchronization prior to, and during, observation and execution of a sequential finger movement. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 251-266.
8. Carmichael, S. T., Wei, L., Rovainen, C. M., & Woolsey, T. A. (2001). New patterns of intracortical projections after focal cortical stroke. Neurobiology of Disease, 8, 910-922.
9. Cochin, S., Barthelemy, C., Lejeune, B., Roux, S., & Martineau, J. (1998). Perception of motion and qEEG activity in human adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 107, 287-295.
10. Cochin, S., Barthelemy, C., Roux, S., & Martineau, J. (1999). Observation and execution of movement: Similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1839-1842.
11. Collins, D. J., Smith, D., & Hale, B. D. (1998). Imagery perspectives and karate performance. Journal of Sport Sciences, 16, 103-104.
12. Danckert, J., Ferber, S., Doherty, T., Streinmetz, H., Nicolle, D., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Selective non-lateralized impairment of motor imagery following right parietal damage. Neurocase, 8, 194-204.
13. Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 577-596.
14. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4-14.
15. Decety, J., Grèzes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., et al. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain, 120, 1763-1777.
16. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioral Brain Research, 72, 127-134.
17. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
18. Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 527-533.
19. DeWit, L., Putman, K., Dejaeger, E., Baert, I., Berman, P., Bogaerts, K., et al. (2005). Use of time by stroke patients: A comparison of four European rehabilitation centres. Stroke, 36, 1977-1983.
20. Diamond, P. T. (2001). Rehabilitative management of post-stroke visuospatial inattention. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 407-412.
21. Dijkererman, H. C., Ietswaart, M., Johnston, M., & MacWalters, R. S. (2004). Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 538-549.
22. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608-2611.
23. Farah, M. J. (2000). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 965-974). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Farrer, C., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15, 596-603.
25. Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424, 769-771.
26. Gaggioli, A., Morganti, F., Walker, R., Meneghini, A., Alcaniz, M., Lozano, J. A., et al. (2004). Training with computer-supported motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 327-332.
27. Gillespie, D. C., Brown, A., & Foster, J. K. (2006). Memory impairment following right hemispheric stroke: A comparative meta-analytic and narrative review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 59-75.
28. Goldenberg, G. (1989). The ability of patients with brain damage to generate mental visual images. Brain, 112, 305-325.
29. Gonzalez, B., Rodriguez, M., Ramirez, C., & Sabate, M. (2005). Disturbance of motor imagery after cerebellar stroke. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 622-626.
30. Grèzes, J., Costes, N., & Decety, J. (1998). Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 553-582.
31. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377-442.
32. Hale, B. D. (1982). The effects of internal and external imagery on muscular and ocular concomitants. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 379-387.
33. Hall, C. R., & Martin, K. A. (1997). Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 143-154.
34. Hardy, L., & Callow, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 21, 95-112.
35. Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., Kirveskari, E., Salenius, S., & Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: A neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 15061-15065.
36. Holmes, P. S., Calmels, C., & Story, E. J. (2003, March). Self-modelling effects in young gymnasts: Skill dependent use of the external visual perspective. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, UK, 26.
37. Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60-83.
38. Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2002). The problem of motor imagery: A functional equivalence solution. In I. Cockerill (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology (pp. 120-140). London: Thomson Learning.
39. Holmes, P. S., Collins, D. J., & Calmels, C. (2006). Electroencephalographic functional equivalence during observation of action. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 605-616.
40. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolati, G. (1999, December 24). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
41. Isaac, A., Marks, D., & Russell, E. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 10, 23-30.
42. Jackson, P. L., Doyon, J., Richards, C. L., & Malouin, F. (2004). The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot-sequence task after stroke: A case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18, 106-111.
43. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
44. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
45. Johnson, S. H., Sprehn, G., & Saykin, A. J. (2002). Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: Evidence for activity-independent action representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 841-852.
46. Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain and Cognition, 55, 328-331.
47. Kleinschmidt, A., Thilo, K. V., Büchel, C., Gresty, M. A., Bronstein, A. M., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2002). Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion. NeuroImage, 16, 873-882.
48. Lang, P. J. (1985). Cognition in emotion: Concept and action. In C. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotion, cognitions and behavior (pp. 192-225). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Liu, K. P., Chan, C. C., Lee, T. M., & Hui-Chan, C. W. (2004). Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1403-1408.
50. Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Desrosiers, J., & Doyon, J. (2004). Bilateral slowing of mentally simulated actions after stroke. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 15, 1349-1353.
51. Marks, D. F., & Isaac, A. R. (1995). Topographical distribution of EEG activity accompanying visual and motor imagery in vivid and non-vivid imagers. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 271-282.
52. McCullagh, P., & Weiss, M. R. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 205-238). New York: Wiley.
53. Moore, E. (2004). Electromyographic functional equivalence during internal and external observation of movement. Unpublished master's thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cheshire, England.
54. Moran, A. P. (2004). Sport and exercise psychology: A critical introduction. Hove, England: Routledge.
55. Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Johnson, B. W. (2004). Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiology, 41, 52-156.
56. Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Johnson, B. W., & McNair, N. A. (2004). Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 195-201.
57. Naito, E., Kochiyama, T., Kitada, R., Nakamura, M., Yonekura, Y., & Sadato, N. (2002). Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. Journal of Neurosciences, 22, 3683-3691.
58. Nishitani, N., & Hari, R. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Neurobiology, 97, 913-918.
59. Page, S. J. (2000). Imagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 200-215.
60. Page, S. J. (2001). Mental practice: A promising restorative technique in stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8, 54-63.
61. Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S-A., Johnston, M. V. (2001). A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, 233-240.
62. Pomeroy, V. M., Clark, C. A., Miller, J. S. G., Baron, J-C., Markus, H. S., & Tallis, R. C. (2005). The potential for utilizing the "mirror neurone system" to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: A review and hypothesis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 19, 4-13.
63. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
64. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
65. Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546-550.
66. Vicenzini, E., Altieri, M., Di Legge, M. S., Bonaffini, N., Rocco, A., Calabresi, M., et al. (2002). The consequences of stroke on mechanisms for emotions and empathy. Neurology India, 50, S109-S111.
67. Vogeley, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Neural correlates of the first-person perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 38-42.
68. Weiss, T., Hansen, E., Beyer, L., Conradi, M-L., Merten, F., Nichelmann, C., et al. (1994). Activation processes during mental practice in stroke patients. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 17, 91-100.
69. Weiss, T., Hansen, E., Rost, R., & Beyer, L. (1994). Mental practice of motor skills used in poststroke rehabilitation has own effects on central nervous activation. International Journal of Neuroscience, 78, 157-166.
70. White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 169-180.
71. Williams, J. D., Rippon, G., Stone, B. M., & Annett, J. (1995). Psychophysiological correlates of dynamic imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 283-300.