A framework for developing marked-based policies to further biodiversity on non-industrial private forests (NIPF)

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 779-788

  Matta, Jagannadha ^a   Alavalapati, Janaki ^a   Tanner, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Contingent valuation; Dynamic optimization; Private forest management; Sustainability; Willingness to accept

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CONTINGENT VALUATION; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; PRIVATE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT;

BIODIVERSITY; PUBLIC POLICY;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33847650864     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alavalapati J.R.R., Stainback G.A., and Carter D.R. Restoration of longleaf pine ecosystem on private lands in the U.S. South: an ecological economic analysis. Ecological Economics 40 (2002) 411-419
2. Ananda J., and Herath G. The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 5 (2003) 13-26
3. Ash A.N., and Bruce R.C. Impacts of timber harvesting on salamanders. Conservation Biology 8 (1994) 300-301
4. Ash A.N., Bruce R.C., Castanet J., and Francillon-Viellot H. Population parameters of Plethodon metcalfi on a 10-year-old clearcut and in nearby forest in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains. Journal of Herpetology 37 (2003) 445-452
5. Butry D.T., Mercer D.E., Prestemon J.R., Pye J.M., and Holmes T.P. What is the price of catastrophic wildfire?. Journal of Forestry 99 (2001) 9-17
6. Cox J., Kautz R., MacLaughlin M., and Gilbert T. Closing the Gaps in Florida's Wildlife Habitat Conservation System (1994), Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL
7. Dillman D.A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Total Design Method (1978), John Wiley & Sons, New York
8. Doswald, N., Zimmermann, F., Breitenmoser, U., in press. Testing expert groups for a habitat suitability model for the Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Swiss Alps. Wildlife Biology 12(4).
9. Emmingham W.H. Development of ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Biosystems 136 (2002) 167-175
10. FGDL. The Florida Geographic Data Library (2004). http://www.fgdl.org/ http://www.fgdl.org/
11. Hartley M.J. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management 155 (2002) 81-95
12. Hartman R. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry 14 (1976) 52-58
13. Hiselius L.W. Using choice experiments to assess people's preferences for railway transports of hazardous materials. Risk Analysis 25 (2005) 1199-1214
14. Holmes T.P., and Adamowicz W.L. Attribute-based methods. In: Champ P., Boyle K., and Brown T. (Eds). A Primer on Non-Market Valuation (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 171-219
15. Jose S., Cox J., Miller D.L., Shilling D.G., and Merritt S. Alien plant invasions in southeastern forests: the story of cogongrass. Journal of Forestry 100 (2002) 41-44
16. Kautz R.S., and Cox J.A. Strategic habitats for biodiversity conservation in Florida. Conservation Biology 15 (2001) 55-77
17. Kline J.D., Butler B.J., and Alig R.J. Tree planting in the south: what does the future hold?. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 26 (2002) 99-107
18. Langpap C. Conservation incentives programs for endangered species: an analysis of landowner participation. Land Economics 80 (2004) 375-388
19. LIMDEP. LIMDEP Version 7.0 (1998), Economic Software Inc., New York
20. Loomis J.B., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., and Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 103-117
21. Marion R.W., Matthew W., and Tanner G.W. Management of Pine Forests for Selected Wildlife in Florida. CIR vol. 706 (2002), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW098 http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW098
22. McConnell W.V. Initiating uneven-aged management in longleaf pine stands: impacts on red-cockaded woodpecker habitat. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30 (2002) 1276-1280
23. Means D.B., Palis J.G., and Baggett M. Effects of slash pine silviculture on a Florida population of flatwoods salamander. Conservation Biology 10 (1996) 426-437
24. Means D.B., Dodd Jr. C.K., Johnson S.A., and Palis J.G. Amphibians and fire in longleaf pine ecosystems: response to Schurbon and Fauth. Conservation Biology 18 (2004) 1149-1153
25. NCSSF. Report of the Annual Symposium on Biodiversity in Forest Planning and Management, June 20, 2002, Portland, Oregon (2002), National Commission on Science for Sustainable Forestry. http://www.cnie.org/NCSE/NCSSF/page.cfm?FID=2147 http://www.cnie.org/NCSE/NCSSF/page.cfm?FID=2147
26. Pearce J.K., Cherry K., Drielsma M., Ferrier S., and Whish G. Incorporating expert opinion and fine-scale vegetation mapping into statistical models of faunal distribution. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 (2001) 412-424
27. Petranka J.W. Response to impact of timber harvesting on salamanders. Conservation Biology 8 (1994) 302-304
28. Petranka J.W. Recovery of salamanders after clearcutting in the southern Appalachians: a critique of Ash's estimates. Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 203-205
29. Provencher L., Litt A.R., and Gordon D.R. Predictors of species richness in northwest Florida longleaf pine sandhills. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 1660-1671
30. Repenning R.W., and Labisky R.F. Effects of even-aged timber management on bird communities of the longleaf pine forest in northern Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 49 (1985) 1088-1098
31. Robertson K.M., and Ostertag T.E. Problems with Schurbon and Fauth's test of effects of prescribed burning on amphibian diversity. Conservation Biology 18 (2004) 1154-1155
32. Schmoldt D.L., Kanagas J., Mendoza G.A., and Pesonen M. The Analytical Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making (2001), Kluwer, The Netherlands
33. Schurbon J.M., and Fauth J.E. Effects of prescribed burning on amphibian diversity in a southeastern U.S. national forest. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 1338-1349
34. Shrestha R.K., and Alavalapati J.R.R. Valuing environmental benefits of silvopasture practice: a case study of the lake Okeechobee watershed in Florida. Ecological Economics 49 (2004) 349-359
35. Shrestha R.K., Alavalapati J.R.R., and Kalmbacher R.S. Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems 81 (2004) 185-199
36. Smith V.K., and Osborne L.L. Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ?scope? test? a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (1996) 287-301
37. Stainback G.A., and Alavalapati J.R.R. Modeling catastrophic risk in economic analysis of forest carbon sequestration. Natural Resource Modeling 17 (2004) 299-317
38. Stewart D. Prescribed burning in Southern pine forests: Fire ecology, techniques, and uses for wildlife management. Mississippi State University Extension Service publication 2283 (2005). http://msucares.com/pubs/publications/p2283.pdf http://msucares.com/pubs/publications/p2283.pdf
39. U.S. Census Bureau. State and County Quick Facts (2003), The United States Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.
40. Yin R., Pienaar L.V., and Aronow M.E. The productivity and profitability of fiber farming. Journal of Forestry 96 (1998) 13-18