Effective size, census size, and genetic monitoring of the endangered razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 417-425

  Turner, Thomas F ^a   Dowling, Thomas E ^b   Marsh, Paul C ^b   Kesner, Brian R ^b   Kelsen, Anne T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorado River fishes; Genetically effective population size; Hedgecock effect; Ne N ratio

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CYPRINID; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MONITORING; SPAWNING POPULATION;

LAKE MOHAVE; NEVADA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PISCES; XYRAUCHEN; XYRAUCHEN TEXANUS;

EID: 33847647621     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9181-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alò D, Turner TF (2005) Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective population size in the endangered Rio Grande silvery minnow. Conserv Biol 19:1138-1148
2. e) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Mol Ecol 12:35-49
3. Bagley MJ, Lindquist DG, Geller JB (1999) Microsatellite variation, effective population size, and population genetic structure of vermilion snapper, Rhomboplites aurorubens, off the southeastern USA. Mar Biol 134:609-620
4. Caballero A (1994) Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73:657-679
5. Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Dahl J, Prestegaard T, Lof AC, Jarvi T (2004) Reproductive success of hatchery produced and wild born brown trout in an experimental stream. J Appl Ecol 41:355-364
6. Dowling TE, Minckley WL, Marsh PC, Goldstein E (1996a) Mitochondrial DNA diversity in the endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus): analysis of hatchery stocks and implications for captive propagation. Conserv Biol 10:120-127
7. Dowling TE, Minckley WL, Marsh PC (1996b) Mitochondrial DNA diversity within and among populations of razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis. Copeia 1996:542-550
8. Dowling TE, Marsh PC, Kelsen AT, Tibbets CA (2005) Genetic monitoring of wild and repatriated populations of endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus, Catostomidae, Teleostei) in Lake Mohave, Arizona-Nevada. Mol Ecol 14:123-135
9. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491
10. Fiumera AC, Porter BA, Grossman GD, Avise JC (2002) Intensive genetic assessment of the mating system and reproductive success in a semi-closed population of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi. Mol Ecol 11:2367-2377
11. Franklin IR (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary- ecological perspective. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, MA, pp 135-150
12. Garrigan D, Marsh PC, Dowling TE (2002) Long-term effective population size of three endangered Colorado River fishes. Anim Conserv 5:95-102
13. Hauser L, Adcock GJ, Smith PJ et al (2002) Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99:11742-11747
14. Heath DD, Busch C, Kelly J, Atagi DY (2002) Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol 11:197-214
15. Hedgecock D (1994) Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms?. In: Beaumont AR (ed) Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 122-134
16. Hedrick PW (2005a) Genetics of populations, 3rd edn. Jones & Bartlet, Sudbury, MA
17. e/N ratio. Evolution 59:1596-1599
18. Hill WG (1979) A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics 92:317-322
19. Hoarau G, Boon E, Jongma DN, Ferber S, Palsson J, Van der Veer HW, Rijnsdorp AD, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2005) Low effective population size and evidence for inbreeding in an overexploited flatfish, plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 272:497-503
20. Hutchinson WF, van Oosterhout C, Rogers SI, Carvalho GR (2003) Temporal analysis of archived samples indicates marked genetic changes in declining North Sea cod (Gadus morhua). Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 270:2125-2132
21. Jorde PE, Ryman N (1995) Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 139:1077-1090
22. Jorde PE, Ryman N (1996) Demographic genetics of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and estimates of effective population size from temporal change of allele frequencies. Genetics 143:1369-1381
23. Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R (1995) Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat 146:489-518
24. Marsh PC, Pacey CA, Kesner BR (2003) Decline of the razorback sucker in Lake Mohave, Colorado River, Arizona and Nevada. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:1251-1256
25. Marsh PC, Kesner CA, Pacey CA (2005) Repatriation as management strategy to conserve a critically imperiled fish species. N Am J Fish Manage 25:547-556
26. McCarthy MS, Minckley WL (1987) Age estimation for razorback sucker (Pisces: Catostomidae) from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada. J Arizona-Nevada Acad Sci 21:87-97
27. Miller LM, Kapuscinski AR (1997) Historical analysis of genetic variation reveals low effective population size in a northern pike (Esox lucius) population. Genetics 147:1249-1258
28. Minckley WL (1983) Status of the razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus (Abbott), in the Lower Colorado River basin. Southwest Nat 28:165-187
29. Minckley WL, Marsh PC, Brooks JE, Johnson JE, Jensen BL (1991) Management toward recovery of the razorback sucker. In: Minckley WL, Deacon JE (eds) Battle against extinction: native fish management in the american west. Univ. Arizona Press, Tempe AZ, pp 303-357
30. Minckley WL, Marsh PC, Deacon JE, Dowling TE, Hedrick PW, Matthews WJ, Mueller G (2003) A conservation plan for lower Colorado River native fishes. BioScience 53:219-234
31. Mueller G (1995) A program for maintaining the razorback sucker in Lake Mohave. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:127-135
32. Nei M, Tajima F (1981) Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics 98:625-640
33. Nunney L (2002) The effective size of annual plant populations: the interaction of a seed bank with fluctuating population size in maintaining genetic variation. Am Nat 160:195-204
34. Nunney L, Elam DR (1994) Estimating the effective size of conserved populations. Conserv Biol 8:175-184
35. Palm S, Laikre L, Jorde PE, Ryman N (2003) Effective population size and temporal genetic change in stream resident brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) Conserv Gen 4:249-264
36. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish Res Bd Can Bull 191:1-382
37. Rieman BE, Allendorf FW (2001) Effective population size and genetic conservation criteria for bull trout. N Am J Fish Manage 21:756-764
38. Saillant E, Gold JR (2006) Population structure and variance effective size of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull 104:136-148
39. Sunnucks P, Wilson ACC, Beheregaray LB, Zenger K, French J, Taylor AC (2000) SSCP is not so difficult: the application and utility of single-stranded conformation polymorphism in evolutionary biology and molecular ecology. Mol Ecol 9:1699-1710
40. Turner TF, Richardson LR, Gold JR (1999) Temporal genetic variation of mitochondrial DNA and the female effective population size of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mol Ecol 8:1223-1229
41. Turner TF, Wares JP, Gold JR (2002) Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics 162:1329-1339
42. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1998) Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) recovery plan. USFWS Denver, Colorado, p 81
43. Waite TA, Parker PG (1996) Dimensionless life histories and effective population size. Conserv Biol 10:1456-1462
44. Waples RS (1989) A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121:379-391
45. Waples RS (2002a) Definition and estimation of effective population size in the conservation of endangered species. In: Bessinger SR, McCullough DR (eds) Population viability analysis. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 147-168
46. Waples RS (2002b) Effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics 161:783-791
47. e/N ratio. Mol Ecol 11:1029-1037
48. Waples RS (2005) Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Mol Ecol 14:3335-3352