Parental artistic drawings of the fetus before and after 3-/4-dimensional ultrasonography

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 301-308

  Pretorius, Dolores H ^a,b,g   Hearon, Heather A ^b   Hollenbach, Kathryn A ^a   Ji, Eun Kyung ^c   Gattu, Shilpa ^a   Nelson, Novella M ^d   Nelson, Tanya M ^e   Chibuk, Jason ^b   Hull, Andrew D ^a   Newton, Ruth P ^f   Nelson, Thomas R ^a  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CHA University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e TORREY PINES INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR STUDIES   (United States)

^f St Vincent de Paul Village   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

3 dimensional ultrasonography; Fetus; Maternal fetal bonding

Indexed keywords

DRAWING (GRAPHICS); IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PEDIATRICS;

ANATOMIC STRUCTURES; DRAWING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT; FETUS; MATERNAL FETAL BONDING; THREE DIMENSIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRAWING; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

EID: 33847631616     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.3.301     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Maier B, Steiner H, Wienerroither H, Staudach A. The psychological impact of three-dimensional fetal imaging on the feto-maternal relationship. New York, NY: Parthenon; 1997:67-73.
2. Timor-Tritsch I, Platt L. Three-dimensional ultrasound experiences in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14:569-575.
3. Pretorius D, Gattu S, Ji E, et al. Preexamination and Post-examination Assessment of Parental-Fetal Bonding in Patients Undergoing 3-/4-Dimensional Obstetric Ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25:1411-1421.
4. Sedgman B, McMahon C, Cairns D, Benzie R, Woodfield R. The impact of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional ultrasound exposure on maternal-fetal attachment and maternal health behavior in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:245-251.
5. Campbell S. 4D prenatal bonding: still more questions than answers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:243-244.
6. Carlson E, Sampson M, Sroufe L. Implications of attachment theory and research for development-behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003; 24:364-379.
7. Klaus M, Kennell J, Klaus P. Introduction. In: Bonding: Building the Foundations of Secure Attachment and Independence. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1995.
8. Campbell S, Reading A, Cox D, et al. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: the short-term psychological effects of early real-time scans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 157-61.
9. Fletcher J, Evans M. Sounding boards: maternal bonding in early fetal ultrasound examinations. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:392-393.
10. Tsoi M, Hunter M. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: consumer reactions. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1987; 5:43-48.
11. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, et al. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2:585-588.
12. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Rabinowitz R, Diamant N. Parental attitudes toward obstetric ultrasound examination. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23:25-28.
13. Stein M. The use of family drawings by children in pediatric practice. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2001; 22(suppl):S49-S54.
14. Stein M. The use of family drawings by children in pediatric practice. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1997; 18:334-339.
15. Gudex C, Nielsen B, Madsen M. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:145-150.
16. Campbell S. Opinion: 4D, or not 4D: that is the question. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:1-4.
17. Doubilet P. Entertainment ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:251-254.
18. Righetti P, Dell'Avanzo M, Grigio M, Nicolini U. Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth dimensional ultrasound technique: a preliminary report. Br J Psychol 2005; 96:129-137.
19. Rustico M, Mastromatteo C, Grigio M, Maggioni C, Gregori D, Nicolini U. Two-dimensional vs two-plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:468-472.
20. Ji E, Pretorius D, Newton R, et al. Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: a comparison of 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:473-477.
21. Boyle R, de Crespegny L, Savulescu J. An ethical approach to giving couples information about their fetus. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:2253-2256.