Preexamination and postexamination assessment of parental-fetal bonding in patients undergoing 3-/4-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1411-1421

  Pretorius, Dolores H ^a,e   Gattu, Shilpa ^b   Ji, Eun Kyung ^c   Hollenbach, Kathryn ^a   Newton, Ruth ^d   Hull, Andrew ^a   Carmona, Susana ^a   D'Agostini, Deborah ^a   Nelson, Thomas R ^a  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CHA University   (South Korea)

^d St Vincent de Paul Village   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetus, 3 dimensional; Maternal fetal attachment; Maternal fetal bonding; Ultrasonography, 3 dimensional

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CONTROL; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

MATERNAL FETAL ATTACHMENT; MATERNAL FETAL BONDING; PARENTAL BONDING; SONOGRAMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

FETAL MONITORING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; EMOTION; FEMALE; FOUR DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 33846965944     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.11.1411     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Merz E, Bahlman F, Weber G. Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5:222-227.
2. Dyson R, Pretorius D, Budorick N, et al. Three dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16321-328.
3. Lumely J. Through a glass darkly: ultrasound and prenatal bonding. Birth 1990; 17:214-217.
4. Zechmeister I. Fetal images: the power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women's reproductive freedom. Health Care Anal 2001; 9:387-400.
5. Tsoi M, Hunter M. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: consumer reactions. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1987; 5:43-48.
6. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Rabinowitz R, Diamant Y. Parental attitudes toward obstetric ultrasound examination. J Obstet Gynecol Res 1997; 23:25-28.
7. Campbell S, Reading A, Cox D, et al. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: the short-term psychological effects of early real-time scans. J Pschychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 1-2:57-61.
8. Fletcher J, Evans M. Sounding boards: maternal bonding in early fetal ultrasound examinations. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:392-393.
9. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, et al. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2:585-588.
10. Klaus M, Kennell J, Klaus P. Introduction. In: Klaus M, Kennell J, Klaus P (eds). Bonding: Building the Foundations of Secure Attachment and Independence. Vol 18. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1995.
11. Carlson E, Sampson M, Sroufe L. Implications of attachment theory and research for development-behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003; 24:364-379.
12. Maier B, Steiner H, Wienerroither H, et al. The psychological impact of three-dimensional fetal imaging on the fetomaternal relationship. In: Baba K, Jurkovic D (eds). Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, NY: Parthenon; 1997:67-74.
13. Pretorius D, Uyan K, Newton R, et al. Effects of US on maternal-fetal bonding: 2D vs 3D [abstract]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18[suppl 1]:20.
14. Ji E, Pretorius D, Newton R, et al. Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:473-477.
15. Righetti P, Dell'Avanzo M, Grigio M, Nicolini U. Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth dimensional ultrasound technique: a preliminary report. Br J Psychol 2005; 96:129-137.
16. Rustico M, Mastromatteo C, Grigio M, Maggioni C, Gregori D, Nicolini U. Two-dimensional vs two-plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:468-472.
17. Sedgmen B, McMahon C, Cairns D, Benzie RJ, Woodfield RL. The impact of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional ultrasound exposure on maternal-fetal attachment and maternal health behavior in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:245-251.
18. Cranley M. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 1981; 30: 281-284.
19. Burns D. Therapist's Toolkit: Comprehensive Assessment and Treatment Tools for the Mental Health Professional. Stanford, CA: D Burns; 1997:117. Available at: david@feelinggood.com.
20. Timor-Tritsch I, Platt L. Three-dimensional ultrasound experiences in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14:569-575.
21. Xu H, Zhang Q, Lu M, Xiao X. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30:515-525.
22. Baba K, Okai T, Kozuma S, Taketani Y. Fetal abnormalities: evaluation with real-time-processible three-dimensional US - preliminary report. Radiology 1999; 211:441-446.
23. Benoit B. The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the screening of the fetal skeleton. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19:403-409.
24. Pretorius D, Nelson T. Fetal face visualization using three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:349-356.
25. Nelson T, Elvins T, Visualization of 3D ultrasound data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1993; 13:50-57.
26. Gudex C, Nielsen B, Madsen M. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:145-150.
27. Pretorius D, Lee S, Newton R, Hull AD, Nelson TR. Perceptions of sonographers and sonologists regarding use of 3D ultrasound in the fetus [abstract]. J Ultrasound Medicine 2004; 23(suppl):S:26.
28. Kowalcek I, Muhlhoff A, Bachman S, Gembruch U. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:18-23.
29. Campbell S. 4D, or not 4D: that is the question. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:1-4.
30. Campbell S. 4D prenatal bonding: still more questions than answers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:243-244.